Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

How many SCOTUS appointments will Trump get?

Posted on 11/13/16 at 7:29 am
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 7:29 am
Is that old Jewish chick gonna die soon or what?
Posted by BamaScoop
Panama City Beach, Florida
Member since May 2007
56702 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 7:31 am to
3
Posted by Kino74
Denham springs
Member since Nov 2013
5360 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 7:32 am to
He has Scalia replacement. Ginsburg is neither going to retire or die in off leaving a spot vacant so it's possible to get her spot or if reelected, he has her replacement for sure. Kennedy and Breyer are looking to retire in near future.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
56127 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 7:33 am to
Said she would leave the country. Again, all talk by a liberal.

Trump in a four term might get to replace two of them. A four year term, at least three.
Posted by Kino74
Denham springs
Member since Nov 2013
5360 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 7:34 am to
quote:

Trump in a four term might get to replace two of them. A four year term, at least three.


If Kennedy retires this term then SCOTUS is gtg. The additional ginsburg and Breyer would be gravy on top.
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
39425 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 7:36 am to
3 possibly 4...Thomas may have had enough.
Posted by SquirrelyBama
Member since Nov 2011
6389 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 7:37 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/5/20 at 9:50 am
Posted by papasmurf1269
Hells Pass
Member since Apr 2005
21383 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 7:38 am to
And on the other end of the spectrum if I were a Supreme Court justice and was close to retirement I think with the Republican president I may be more apt to retire now.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19266 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 7:51 am to
Hopefully Trump can halt the talk of placing (((Garland))) on the court to replace Scalia. We certainly do not need anymore parentheticals on the court. There's 3 already.

But I am sure it is mere coincidence that the parentheticals are always the most extreme leftists. Yeah, pure coincidence.
Posted by Layabout
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2011
11082 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 8:17 am to
None. The democrats will block all appointments for the next four years.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 8:21 am to
quote:

Breyer


Needs to go soonest.
Posted by Dead End
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
21237 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 8:27 am to
quote:


Is that old Jewish chick gonna die soon or what


Hopefully
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 8:30 am to
yea that wouldn't work out well. I hope they try it though, people will get pissed the frick off. You end up with higher Republican and indy turnout and another land slide for Trump.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
38759 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 8:32 am to
They'll prop her up like 'Weekend at Bernies'; but hopefully, enough to nail down the Constitution for the next 25 years.

The Marxist Left will likely go rogue; it's their MO.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112700 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 8:46 am to
At least 3 in 4

5 in 8 years
Posted by MintBerry Crunch
Member since Nov 2010
5844 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 8:47 am to
How? Majority is Repubs. What's it take? 2/3?
Posted by Zelig
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
137 posts
Posted on 11/13/16 at 9:00 am to
I can easily see three and maybe four--Scalia replacement, Ginsberg, and then Breyer or Kennedy--but it could be more than that if Thomas decides that he would rather have a Republican president make the appointment then some future Democratic president. Even two appointments could shift SCOTUS, but more than that could start to undo a lot of the damage left by the current court and previous courts.

All of this depends on the dependability of President Trump to name conservative justices. With Republican control of the Senate, now is the time to move, but I am not completely sure that President Trump will dependably nominate the kind of justices that are needed to shift the court. I hope so.

By the way, I think that there is a reasonable chance that the Republican Senate majority will change the filibuster rules to permit a majority vote on SCOTUS nominees. Without it all of the Senate Democrats who have criticized the Republicans for stonewalling President Obama's nominees will now find that this is a fair and reasonable strategy. Senate Democrats will make every effort to prevent President Trump from making his SCOTUS appointments,so it may take changes in the filibuster to get that done. Recall that Harry Reid pushed through a similar rule change in 2013 to permitted majority votes on federal nominations below the level of the Supreme Court.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram