- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How exactly do the legal challenges play out once Emergency is declared?
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:12 am
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:12 am
From anyone who actually knows what the hell they are talking about only please.
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:18 am to Cow Drogo
First some goes in front of some radical judge in Hawaii
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:21 am to Cow Drogo
There's not going to be a emergency declaration.
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:25 am to Cow Drogo
Chief justice Roberts disappoints the poli board, bigly.
Old lady is wheeled in to cast deciding vote.
Yes, the president can be indicted.
Old lady is wheeled in to cast deciding vote.
Yes, the president can be indicted.
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:26 am to CelticDog
quote:
Old lady is wheeled in to cast deciding vote.
I am going to want to see up to the minute proof of life and identity every time she casts a vote from now on.
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:28 am to CelticDog
So Supreme Court gets to decide whether it’s emetgency or not?
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:34 am to Cow Drogo
quote:
So Supreme Court gets to decide whether it’s emetgency or not?
Ultimately, that's where it would probably end up.
Sky screamers would file for an injunction in the 9th circuit federal court in California
The activist judge would most likely grant it
There would be months of legal battles
The 9th circuit would rule against Trump based on very shaky legal ground
The Supreme Court would eventually take up the case months if not a year later
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:35 am to Cow Drogo
First I make a roux me. Comme ca.
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:37 am to Cow Drogo
The House would probably file for injunctive relief
This post was edited on 1/19/19 at 9:52 am
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:47 am to Cow Drogo
Look at Youngstown case and its procedural history.
Would likely start with a preliminary injunction, which would be granted by a favorable judge.
Look for significant forum shopping
Would likely start with a preliminary injunction, which would be granted by a favorable judge.
Look for significant forum shopping
This post was edited on 1/19/19 at 12:03 pm
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:48 am to KosmoCramer
quote:
So Supreme Court gets to decide whether it’s emetgency or not?
Ultimately, that's where it would probably end up.
Sky screamers would file for an injunction in the 9th circuit federal court in California
The activist judge would most likely grant it
There would be months of legal battles
The 9th circuit would rule against Trump based on very shaky legal ground
The Supreme Court would eventually take up the case months if not a year later
While a liberal judge issues a "stay" until it can be decided, the new AG says "What part of EMERGENCY did you not understand" and they continue to build.
It gets to the supreme court, and the AG says we have to have NINE justices rule, not eight and a law clerk on behalf of ginsburg. So they wheel her into court for the vote and the AG says not so fast.
We have a drug policy, you cannot be taking drugs which impair your ability to perform your job....and vote. Now if she does stop taking the drugs...well the supreme court has ruled that you cant refuse medical treatment that can endanger a persons life. So either way she is not fit to vote or remain on the supreme court....unless you want to delay the case until she is healthy, or passes away. If the latter we can just drag out the next nominee til the wall is built.
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:49 am to bmy
quote:
Probably impeachment
Are you serious? It was Congress that ceded this authority to the President to begin with. This isn't a high crime or a misdemeanor.
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:53 am to trinidadtiger
what are the chances you think it plays out the way you described?
Posted on 1/19/19 at 10:00 am to trinidadtiger
If anything
They can get some of it built while the legal tantrum unfolds
They can get some of it built while the legal tantrum unfolds
Posted on 1/19/19 at 10:05 am to Cow Drogo
I don’t have a link, but I did hear this being talked about by Dershowitz a few days ago. He said a shopped for liberal judge (prob from 9th circus) would try to block, but that in this case there would be a mechanism for it to be expedited upward to the SCOTUS and the process would be ruled on in only about two months.
Posted on 1/19/19 at 10:08 am to udtiger
You guys do realize that the Constitution grants Congress the “power of the purse”, right?
Posted on 1/19/19 at 10:11 am to VOR
Of course. What is the implication?
Posted on 1/19/19 at 10:18 am to geaux88
But could building start instantly and go on during 2 months?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News