- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How do so many Americans have a fundamental misunderstanding of the 2nd amendment?
Posted on 2/21/18 at 12:05 am to Clames
Posted on 2/21/18 at 12:05 am to Clames
Again, you believe that several states are in open defiance of our constitution and the courts just hadn't had the chance to get around to them and their constitutionally unlawful bans on certain firearms?
2
Posted on 2/21/18 at 12:09 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
So you believe that several states are in open defiance of the United States Constitution and have been for decades?
Oh they are but just because they pass a law means the SCOTUS can just sweep in and invalidate it. It's a years long process in most cases. Took 6 years to get through v. Heller 1. Cases v. Heller II and v. Heller III took another 7 years collectively. That's 13 years to remove idiotic D.C. handgun laws but it did eventually happen. Dragged their sorry asses kicking and screaming the whole way...
Keep your focus short there kid. Forget that it took almost 20 years to get CCW pushed to all 50 states in one form or another. Doesn't matter how long it takes but it will happen, the religion of gun-control is dying and you better get used to it.
This post was edited on 2/21/18 at 12:14 am
Posted on 2/21/18 at 12:10 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Again, you believe that several states are in open defiance of our constitution and the courts just hadn't had the chance to get around to them and their constitutionally unlawful bans on certain firearms?
Not my fault you're an imbecile that doesn't understand how these things work. Maybe you should spend more time reading and less time being a lousy troll.
Posted on 2/21/18 at 12:10 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Again, you believe that several states are in open defiance of our constitution and the courts just hadn't had the chance to get around to them and their constitutionally unlawful bans on certain firearms?
Do you understand how cases make it to SCOTUS?
I think you should have payed closer attention to your law class your freshman year. You obviously didn't learn anything.
Posted on 2/21/18 at 12:14 am to Centinel
Okay bud. Keep holding your breath on these decades old unlawful bans. They'll be overturned any day now.
Posted on 2/21/18 at 12:19 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
They'll be overturned any day now.
They will be kid, they will be. D.C.'s handgun ban lasted from 1976 to 2008. Chicago's lasted from 1965 until 2010. All that matters is the results and they ain't looking too good for you...
Posted on 2/21/18 at 5:45 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
bans
Name the firearms that you think I can't buy today.
Posted on 2/21/18 at 5:51 am to LSUgrad08112
See we have lots of bunker people that post here after reading the first page. You guys really need to stop thinking the 2% crazies are our populace.
When do you guys think we may have to fight that war against our government?
I like these threads. They show how stupid both sides are. Please keep it going.
When do you guys think we may have to fight that war against our government?
I like these threads. They show how stupid both sides are. Please keep it going.
This post was edited on 2/21/18 at 6:00 am
Posted on 2/21/18 at 6:40 am to i am dan
quote:
When do you guys think we may have to fight that war against our government?
I'd like to know why you think that's relevant...
Platitudes can be fun, but they're not useful.
Posted on 2/21/18 at 7:23 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
I'd like to know why you think that's relevant... Platitudes can be fun, but they're not useful.
Gun crazies created the platitude. I'm just wanting further information.
I think it would be nice to know when the US Military plans to take over the country.
Posted on 2/21/18 at 7:25 am to i am dan
quote:
I think it would be nice to know when the US Military plans to take over the country.
I think it would be nice to know why you think me owning firearms harms you?
Posted on 2/21/18 at 7:28 am to i am dan
quote:
Gun crazies created the platitude. I'm just wanting further information.
No they didn't. You people did. Or do you just not know what a platitude is?
quote:
I think it would be nice to know when the US Military plans to take over the country.
Do you know the difference between deterrence and reaction?
Posted on 2/21/18 at 7:28 am to BACONisMEATcandy
That I'm wasting my time talking to koolaide drinking robots. frick you all
This post was edited on 2/21/18 at 7:29 am
Posted on 2/21/18 at 7:29 am to Napoleon
quote:
frick you all
There it is.
Come back when you know what the frick you're talking about, pumpkin.
Posted on 2/21/18 at 7:46 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
No they didn't. You people did. Or do you just not know what a platitude is?
It means cliche. Somethings used so many times it loses it's becomes useless. I know what it means. You sure you do? And both sides do it. Your side is all about staying armed to fight the govt when they attack (said many times in this thread), and the other side is about nobody having guns or every child's death is your (ie gun owners) fault.
Very funny stuff watching you fringe people argue.
Yes, I know the difference between a deterrence and reaction. You think gun owners having guns is an actual deterrence to the govt taking over if they so desire?
This post was edited on 2/21/18 at 7:49 am
Posted on 2/21/18 at 7:47 am to Centinel
quote:
I think it would be nice to know why you think me owning firearms harms you?
It doesn't I guess. However, other people owning firearms sure harms a few people.
Posted on 2/21/18 at 7:52 am to i am dan
quote:
Your side is all about staying armed to fight the govt when they attack (said many times in this thread)
Considering that's literally written into the document, I'd say it's a strong argument you dumb cuck.
Posted on 2/21/18 at 7:54 am to LSUgrad08112
quote:
I see the “the founders NEVER would’ve expected fully automatic 5.56 assault clips that can shoot 20 rounds per clip second” argument so much from liberals, and it’s so irrelevant.
This logic can be said about a whole bunch of things in the Constitution, but the libs always single out the 2A.
Posted on 2/21/18 at 7:55 am to i am dan
quote:
It means cliche. Somethings used so many times it loses it's becomes useless. I know what it means.
Excellent. I love seeing progress.
Link to this being used as a talking point:
quote:
I think it would be nice to know when the US Military plans to take over the country.
I'd be willing to bet that I can find more instances of you people using it.
quote:
Your side is all about staying armed to fight the govt when they attack (said many times in this thread), and the other side is about nobody having guns or every child's death is your (ie gun owners) fault.
What is my "side?"
quote:
you fringe people
Ask around about me. You're already fricked, even if you don't know it yet.
quote:
Yes, I know the difference between a deterrence and reaction.
Are you sure? Define those as well.
quote:
You think gun owners having guns is an actual deterrence to the govt taking over if they so desire?
You don't?
Posted on 2/21/18 at 7:56 am to i am dan
quote:
Yes, I know the difference between a deterrence and reaction. You think gun owners having guns is an actual deterrence to the govt taking over if they so desire?
As a man who has helped "take over" two separate nations, I can answer that question with a resounding "Yes".
Any other brain busters?
Page 20 of 28
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News