- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:55 pm to Buddy Red
quote:
Any link to gaetz full 5 minutes of questions?
It was good; but not as good as last week.
There is a YouTube live link but you would have to rewind about 20 mins.
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:55 pm to sms151t
quote:
Wouldn’t be smart if one of the Republicans questioned Goldman instead of Castor?
They have been. The entire day Republicans have been asking Goldman questions. I can't remember the last time the Democrats asked Castor a question.
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:01 pm to MFn GIMP
Goldman stonewalling Steube on whether or not he had comms with Whistleblower.
Says it's not relevant... in an impeachment inquiry allegedly launched on actions brought to light by... the whistleblower.
Unreal.
Says it's not relevant... in an impeachment inquiry allegedly launched on actions brought to light by... the whistleblower.
Unreal.
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:03 pm to VoxDawg
Back to muh intimidating witnesses.
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:20 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Says it's not relevant... in an impeachment inquiry allegedly launched on actions brought to light by... the whistleblower.
You do realize that it is quite literally irrelevant, on top of being a terrible precedent to set (with regard to future whistleblowers)?
Why the hang up on who the whistleblower is? If someone calls the police to report a robbery, and the police show up and find a robbery in process, do the defense attorneys spend their entire time grandstanding about who the caller was?
If the whistleblower was hypothetically a major democratic donor who had pictures of Hillary and Obama all over his walls, how would that have any merit with regard to the testimonies of all the other witnesses? Why would it matter? Does it change their testimony?
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:26 pm to Strophie
This bitch just said that Trump could ask Venezuela to investigate someone. Are these people for real?
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:30 pm to MFn GIMP
The cheerleader chick doesn't look tired yet.
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:39 pm to Strophie
quote:
If the whistleblower was hypothetically a major democratic donor who had pictures of Hillary and Obama all over his walls, how would that have any merit with regard to the testimonies of all the other witnesses? Why would it matter? Does it change their testimony?
WHAT TESTIMONIES? That they “felt” like the verbage “suggested” quid pro quo?
How a bout the only face to face meeting with the President where he said “He doesn’t want anything, but that Ukraine do the right thing???”
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:42 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
Back to muh intimidating witnesses.
The Republicans have the combination of being right and being smarter.
WTF are they supposed to do? take a knee?
typical leftist crap, they are as vile as they want to be but cower at the first chance to play the victim
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:43 pm to Strophie
quote:
Why the hang up on who the whistleblower is? If someone calls the police to report a robbery, and the police show up and find a robbery in process, do the defense attorneys spend their entire time grandstanding about who the caller was?
Except in this case someone calls the police to report a robbery, and the police show up and find no robbery had taken place, however the person who made the call has a history of having issues with the person they accused.
And now the defense of the falsely accused is not allowed to know who made the call, any details about them, or question them in any way.
Popular
Back to top

1









