Started By
Message

re: House Judiciary Comm meeting- 5 minute rounds going on now

Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:54 pm to
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
155029 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:54 pm to
They already blew up Goldman.
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
140711 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:54 pm to
Dang I missed it
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
44005 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

Any link to gaetz full 5 minutes of questions?


It was good; but not as good as last week.

There is a YouTube live link but you would have to rewind about 20 mins.

Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
22865 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

Wouldn’t be smart if one of the Republicans questioned Goldman instead of Castor?


They have been. The entire day Republicans have been asking Goldman questions. I can't remember the last time the Democrats asked Castor a question.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75517 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:01 pm to
Goldman stonewalling Steube on whether or not he had comms with Whistleblower.

Says it's not relevant... in an impeachment inquiry allegedly launched on actions brought to light by... the whistleblower.

Unreal.
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
22865 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:03 pm to
Back to muh intimidating witnesses.
Posted by Strophie
Member since Apr 2014
438 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

Says it's not relevant... in an impeachment inquiry allegedly launched on actions brought to light by... the whistleblower.


You do realize that it is quite literally irrelevant, on top of being a terrible precedent to set (with regard to future whistleblowers)?

Why the hang up on who the whistleblower is? If someone calls the police to report a robbery, and the police show up and find a robbery in process, do the defense attorneys spend their entire time grandstanding about who the caller was?

If the whistleblower was hypothetically a major democratic donor who had pictures of Hillary and Obama all over his walls, how would that have any merit with regard to the testimonies of all the other witnesses? Why would it matter? Does it change their testimony?
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
22865 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:26 pm to
This bitch just said that Trump could ask Venezuela to investigate someone. Are these people for real?
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
39917 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:30 pm to
The cheerleader chick doesn't look tired yet.
Posted by Cincinnati Bowtie
Sparta
Member since May 2008
11951 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

If the whistleblower was hypothetically a major democratic donor who had pictures of Hillary and Obama all over his walls, how would that have any merit with regard to the testimonies of all the other witnesses? Why would it matter? Does it change their testimony?

WHAT TESTIMONIES? That they “felt” like the verbage “suggested” quid pro quo?
How a bout the only face to face meeting with the President where he said “He doesn’t want anything, but that Ukraine do the right thing???”
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

Back to muh intimidating witnesses.



The Republicans have the combination of being right and being smarter.

WTF are they supposed to do? take a knee?

typical leftist crap, they are as vile as they want to be but cower at the first chance to play the victim
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44464 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

Why the hang up on who the whistleblower is? If someone calls the police to report a robbery, and the police show up and find a robbery in process, do the defense attorneys spend their entire time grandstanding about who the caller was?



Except in this case someone calls the police to report a robbery, and the police show up and find no robbery had taken place, however the person who made the call has a history of having issues with the person they accused.

And now the defense of the falsely accused is not allowed to know who made the call, any details about them, or question them in any way.

first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram