- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: House AND Senate overrides JBE's veto of bill preventing trans procedures for children
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:15 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:15 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
I'll chalk you up as Big Government
I’ll chalk you up as a pedophile
1
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:17 pm to Jax Teller
I'm simply asking some questions here, and you ladies are just freaking the frick out. Y'all are just DYING to believe I want to chop up little babies and eat them for lunch.
The only reason it seems you want to believe this is some big problem in Louisiana is just because you're being told so. Is there really a problem here? What are potential unintended consequences of the law? No one cares. Just pass it and we'll all feel better, right?
You're no better than the liberals who fall for the fear mongering on the left.
The only reason it seems you want to believe this is some big problem in Louisiana is just because you're being told so. Is there really a problem here? What are potential unintended consequences of the law? No one cares. Just pass it and we'll all feel better, right?
You're no better than the liberals who fall for the fear mongering on the left.
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:17 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
If we're talking about mutilation of infants' genitalia, does that include circumcision?
Lol. Really? Well, go write your bill and get it sponsored then. We'll see if the state agrees or not.
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:18 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
quote:
I'll chalk you up as Big Government
I’ll chalk you up as a pedophile
definitely a child abuser etc
This post was edited on 7/18/23 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:18 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
It’s clear you haven’t read the bill.
Of course I haven't.
That's why I'm asking the questions.
But what about the hermies?
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:19 pm to Herooftheday
quote:
You gotta pass it to know what's in it
Where've I seen that before?
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:20 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
You're no better than the liberals who fall for the fear mongering on the left.
And you're peddling their arguments. What's the problem?
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:21 pm to Roy Curado
quote:
The Louisiana Legislature has overridden Gov. John Bel Edwards' veto of a ban on youth access to gender-affirming health care, aligning the state with a growing list of others that have curtailed medical treatment for transgender people.
Has anyone been following James Finn's writing on this topic in the Advocate? Above is the language that he uses to describe the override of Edwards' veto. Finn drops all pretense of journalistic neutrality and integrity when writing on this topic, cheerleading and adopting the language of progressive activists on this issue. Based on survey data from a variety of reputable polling firms, a majority of Americans do not see this as "gender affirming health care," as Finn asserts. I don't expect Finn to adopt the "child mutilation" language of those who support the override of Edwards' veto, but journalistic integrity demands that he adopt neutral language instead of siding with one side in what are touted as "news" stories. By all appearances, Finn is a pseudo-journalist who is more of an activist in his writing on this and other topics.
This post was edited on 7/18/23 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:22 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:The bill does not apply to children with "ambiguous" genitalia. It is a clean-looking bill.
Does this include surgeries done to the genitals of babies born hermaphrodites?
Here is the bill.
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:23 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
You gotta pass it to know what's in it
I read the bill hence why I agree with it. You have not.
My point was if you don't like the option of circumcision, then bring it before the people. The only reason that I have seen for gender surgeries is for suicide prevention. That's it. And it could be argued that they suicide anyway or are more likely to later when they regret their decision.
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:24 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:so juvenile
I'll chalk you up as Big Governmentquote:
I’ll chalk you up as a pedophilequote:
definitely a child abuser etc
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:25 pm to Herooftheday
quote:It does not. Read the bill.
If we're talking about mutilation of infants' genitalia, does that include circumcision?quote:
Lol. Really?
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:28 pm to FnTigers
quote:
Fred Mills
He's a pharmacist, he doesn't care about the actual kids. He just doesn't want his payday to be gone
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:29 pm to Herooftheday
quote:
you're peddling their arguments.
Questions are not "arguments".
quote:
What's the problem?
That's one of my questions.
We're supposed to be all worked up over a law banning shite that never happens, and we can't ask questions about potential unintended consequences?
I mean, that's the definition of Liberalism, isn't it?
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:31 pm to tzimme4
quote:
He's a pharmacist, he doesn't care about the actual kids. He just doesn't want his payday to be gone
correct
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:32 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
I'm simply asking some questions here, and you ladies are just freaking the frick out.
If you would just read the bill it would answer all of your questions. It’s only 8 pages.
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:34 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
The bill does not apply to children with "ambiguous" genitalia. It is a clean-looking bill.
Thank you Hank. We are the only two that read it, it appears.
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:34 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
It does not. Read the bill.
Was that aimed at me? He asked the question. I didn't answer his question. To me, it was an absurd question.
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:46 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
We are the only two that read it, it appears
The only one that hasn't is the "what if" fellow, Wild.
But I think the wind is finally out of his sails as his questions actually have answers within the bill if he'd bother to read
This post was edited on 7/18/23 at 5:48 pm
Posted on 7/18/23 at 5:46 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Reading a bill is amazingly-useful when discussing a bill, don't you think?quote:Thank you Hank. We are the only two that read it, it appears.
The bill does not apply to children with "ambiguous" genitalia. It is a clean-looking bill.
I always find it entertaining to watch the downvotes and cheap shots, when someone asks for a link to the legislation that is being discussed.
This post was edited on 7/18/23 at 5:47 pm
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News