Started By
Message

re: Hey libs... didn’t you laugh at people who believed “Q” conspiracies?

Posted on 3/4/21 at 12:05 pm to
Posted by freeasareeze
Member since Feb 2021
78 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 12:05 pm to
quote:


Merrick Garland already said he wants to address domestic terrorism



Good. It's past time to investigate Antifa
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
36981 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Do they wall off the school for months afterward and place thousands of armed guards around it (while feeding them contaminated and undercooked food) after they find out the bomb threat was baseless??
If the school was literally attacked by thousands of people chanting to hang the principal, they likely would put up barriers and increase security.
quote:

The entire FBI cannot find these possible assailants? After months?? And a computer trail??
They have made a ton of arrests.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
16141 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

If they have credible intel regarding threats, they still have to prepare. They apparently had that intel before Jan. 6th and it was ignored.


So “Q” was credible?? Tell me it’s not time NOW to take them seriously.

And Jan 6 was supposed to just be “an insurrection led by Trump”. Right? Remember? What prior credible info are you speaking of? The Dems impeached over Trump supposedly making a statement that incited an “insurrection”.

So are you now saying that was more Dem theater? There was a plan beforehand?
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
16141 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

If the school was literally attacked by thousands of people chanting to hang the principal, they likely would put up barriers and increase security.


They just can’t find anyone who is rounding up thousands of folks to storm the Capitol?? In months?? With a computer trail?

And again.... that was “an insurrection caused by Trump”. Remember impeachment 2? Are you now saying it wasn't that? And that it was again a sham?

This is a threat per their “Q” fears. Trump is not in Washington holding a rally.

quote:

They have made a ton of arrests.


Of people planning and organizing a takeover of the Capitol today?? Who?
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30543 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

I wouldn't doubt a huge event to ban guns happens and Q is blamed.



Quite honestly, the push is globalization... so how do you get 1/2 the population to accept blue hats in the street and giving up the 2A?

Stolen election - from either point of view...
Racial tensions stirred as high as possible...
Riots in the streets...
Trampling of civil rights through Covid...

They set it up where one side or the other was going to go off... They almost had it at 1/6 but it fizzled... Now they are pushing for and stirrig for the next event they can use...
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26354 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

So “Q” was credible?? Tell me it’s not time NOW to take them seriously.



Not what I said. I said credible threats to attack the Capitol. That doesn't mean anything Q said was credible.

quote:

And Jan 6 was supposed to just be “an insurrection led by Trump”. Right? Remember? What prior credible info are you speaking of? The Dems impeached over Trump supposedly making a statement that incited an “insurrection”.



The Capitol Police Intel Division produced a memo 3 days before Jan. 6th warning of potential violence directed at Congress. The FBI produced a report on Jan. 5th warning of online chatter regarding violence at the Capitol.

quote:

So are you now saying that was more Dem theater? There was a plan beforehand?



I've said repeatedly on here that the impeachment was a dumb move. They took Trump's speech that morning and his calls for people to come to the Capitol on Jan. 6th to blame him for the whole thing.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112254 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

quote:
Even still, what’s their motive though? I don’t get it at all


They are huddling together... out of the public sight. Scheming.. planning.. ready to enact their plan to......
















Keep Guam from tipping over.


I can assure you their scheming and planning is not a joke.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 12:36 pm to
quote:


The Capitol Police Intel Division produced a memo 3 days before Jan. 6th warning of potential violence directed at Congress. The FBI produced a report on Jan. 5th warning of online chatter regarding violence at the Capitol.



Posted by Captain Rumbeard
Member since Jan 2014
6274 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

This has been my theory the entire time... I think everything we saw was a massive destabilization operation carried out by the Deep State in order to maintain/retain power... "Q" was one part of that... 1/6/2021 was one part of that... The riots over the summer was one part of that...

I've gone back and forth on this. If that were the case, why wouldn't the Trump team come out right away and distance themselves far from the Q movement?


They were novices at this kind of shite. Q was just some dude on a computer talking to 8Kun. Till it wasn't. I don't think they realized what it actually was. And that's a straight up Psy-op to make MAGA look nuts. It gave them the stick they could use to beat up anyone who pointed out some of the shady shite they were actually doing. I think it was likely just to make sure that anybody saying the election was stolen got labeled a Qtard. It would have been difficult to take that as a serious threat until it was too late because by the time they realized it, if they'd called it what it was, all the Qanon people out there that believed it would have felt betrayed and tied it into the whole conspiracy. They'd have decided Barron Trump was under threat or something and that's why Trump denounced Q.

You've got to admit, that whole thing was a brilliant move on their part.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30543 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

The Capitol Police Intel Division produced a memo 3 days before Jan. 6th warning of potential violence directed at Congress. The FBI produced a report on Jan. 5th warning of online chatter regarding violence at the Capitol.


Well, then why did they move the barricades and let folks in?

Also, I thought the Capitol Police Chief said there was no intelligence or they didn't get it... Not saying you are wrong just 2+2 ain't adding up...
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26354 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Well, then why did they move the barricades and let folks in?



I've not seen that. I've seen fighting between the barricades until they were overrun.

quote:

Also, I thought the Capitol Police Chief said there was no intelligence or they didn't get it... Not saying you are wrong just 2+2 ain't adding up...



The FBI report is what you're referring to that they didn't read the day before.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162154 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Well, then why did they move the barricades and let folks in?

Also, I thought the Capitol Police Chief said there was no intelligence or they didn't get it... Not saying you are wrong just 2+2 ain't adding up...
There is video of the DC police moving barricades and letting them in. The FBI arrested antifa and Wray (POS Swamp creature) denied antifa was there.
quote:

Today, during his congressional testimony FBI Director Chris Wray was asked whether Antifa members participated in the January 6th Capitol Hill riot. Director Wray says the FBI “has seen no evidence” of Antifa participating. However, on January 14th the FBI literally arrested Antifa leader John Sullivan for his role in the planning, coordination and participation in the January 6th Capitol Hill riot. WATCH:
quote:

Pentagon took 3 hours 19 minutes response time in 'frantic' request of Nat Guard Jan 6th LINK
quote:

Pelosi just said nat guard will stay as long as they are needed LINK
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74944 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

I've seen fighting between the barricades until they were overrun.


Because CNN/MSNBC aren't going to show you anything that runs counter to their narrative.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74944 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 1:03 pm to
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26354 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

But the viral, 14-second video clip that some are using to claim that officers willingly let rioters past barricades and into the Capitol is being misrepresented online, said journalist Marcus Diapola, who shot the video.

"They definitely didn't just open the barriers," Diapola told PolitiFact. "The pro-Trump rioters made a fist like they were going to punch the cops, which is why I started recording. Then (police) backed off the barricades.

"They were completely outnumbered," Diapola said. "There wouldn't have been any point in fighting."

Diapola said the video was taken around 2 p.m. near the northeast entrance of the Capitol and estimated that the officers were outnumbered "100 to 1," with only around 30 officers spread out between three entrances on that side of the Capitol, compared with thousands of protesters.


https://www.politifact.com/article/2021/jan/07/ask-politifact-did-capitol-police-let-mob-trump-su/?emci=16130fc1-4b54-eb11-a607-00155d43c992&emdi=10b066eb-7454-eb11-a607-00155d43c992&ceid=8717883
Posted by Corso
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2020
11789 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 1:10 pm to
Nancy Pelosi was claiming Trump might nuke somebody in January. It doesn't get more Q than that
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30543 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

"They definitely didn't just open the barriers," Diapola told PolitiFact. "The pro-Trump rioters made a fist like they were going to punch the cops, which is why I started recording. Then (police) backed off the barricades.


Really, and you buy this Mickey? The police were threatened and then moved the barricades to let folks by?

LOL
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26354 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Really, and you buy this Mickey? The police were threatened and then moved the barricades to let folks by?

LOL





When you look at photos like that, showing how outnumbered they were, yes I believe it.
Posted by CaTiger85
Member since Feb 2020
1394 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 2:16 pm to
Why weren’t the national guard backup that trump requested there? Who turned down Trumps request?
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26354 posts
Posted on 3/4/21 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Why weren’t the national guard backup that trump requested there? Who turned down Trumps request?



Trump mentioning in a conversation that they are gonna need 10k national guard troops is not the same as Trump formally requesting the national guard.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram