- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/27/25 at 11:47 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
But, he had to go thermonuclear and here we are.
Yeah, it’s not like the Dems and Deep State are undermining his
Presidency 24 hours per day 7 days a week.
He should be quiet and let them accomplish their agenda.
I mean he is just the President.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 11:51 am to RFK
quote:
We already know Hegseth doesn’t like the rule of law.
He demoted the top JAGs within his first few days in office as secretary of defense.
When he was a national guard lieutenant in Iraq, his brigade commander ordered troops to kill “all military aged males” and then refused to testify on his soldiers’ behalf when 4 of them were court-martialed for murder.
So that’s his experience
Your an insufferable fricktard! Smh
Your a troll. There's no way a person could be such a douche..... or maybe so.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 11:54 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
That's how I feel about Trump. Just say "I agree that illegal orders can be refused. What orders were illegal?" Maybe add something about how they were encouraging insubordination. It would have defused everything immediately. But, he had to go thermonuclear and here we are.
I agree with you on this in essence, but the reality of it is that the Left is so hellbent on anti-Trump-ism that anything less than an over-the-top response just emboldens them to keep going.
Had he ignored it or tried to be reasonable, the responding rhetoric would have been to make MORE videos with even stronger insinuations, likely along the lines of "he didn't take a strong stance against the previous videos because he knows his orders may be unlawful so your should really re-think following them."
In other words, no matter how he responded they were going to try to turn the response into implying affirmation that he's giving unlawful orders.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 11:56 am to Placekicker
quote:
What the Seditious Six have done is to plant the seed. With every order, they are now going to think- “is this lawful?” “Am I going to get prosecuted for executing this order when the Dems get back into power?”
This will grind the military machine to a halt- effectively neutering the greatest military force on Earth.
Yes, this is the political intent for this carefully orchestrated and thought out "chess move" by the Dems. They seek to destroy and undermine this Administration by any and all means possible.
The Dems are at all-out war against Trump and against the American tax-paying and working middle class.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 11:58 am to Champagne
quote:Bingo
Yes, this is the political intent for this carefully orchestrated and thought out "chess move" by the Dems. They seek to destroy and undermine this Administration by any and all means possible.
The Dems are at all-out war against Trump and against the American tax-paying and working middle class.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 12:04 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Do you people ever stop to consider the extent to which SFP lives in your heads?
This. There are people whose post only states what SFP would say. How pathetic of a life must you have to do that?
Posted on 11/27/25 at 12:39 pm to Enadious
quote:And they usually get it wrong.quote:This. There are people whose post only states what SFP would say.
Do you people ever stop to consider the extent to which SFP lives in your heads?
They just attribute to this imaginary-SFP the most-Leftist thought that they can imagine.
Anyone who pays attention to his posts can ACCURATELY guess his position on any given issue, and it is seldom "Leftist" at all. Though it might seem that way to a poster teetering on the edge of falling completely off the far-right edge of the political spectrum.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 12:42 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Relentless alter.
Been here a month.
Has Slowfanipro history in of a half a million posts wired.
Been here a month.
Has Slowfanipro history in of a half a million posts wired.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 12:47 pm to Jbird
quote:
So obvious it begs the question, why make it in the first place?
Because Democrats know that the Trump Administration can't not take the bait. They cannot help themselves.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 12:49 pm to GoblinGuide
Aw so they are simply trolls
No wonder six Dems jumped at the chance.
No wonder six Dems jumped at the chance.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 12:55 pm to Jbird
quote:
Aw so they are simply trolls
No wonder six Dems jumped at the chance.
And the worst part is it's so obvious to you and me but somehow not to Hegseth, Trump, and Co.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 12:56 pm to Placekicker
quote:
It never named a specific “illegal order.”
That will come back to bite him.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 12:57 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
He is 100% correct.
Then the claim of sedition is dumb.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 12:57 pm to GoblinGuide
Or these people are setting a trap to sow discord and are cheering.
Hell Psaki already said we will have Nuremberg style trials.
They are sick twisted fricks
Hell Psaki already said we will have Nuremberg style trials.
They are sick twisted fricks
Posted on 11/27/25 at 1:04 pm to GoblinGuide
quote:
Is "Don't follow illegal orders" a problem statement or just a very obvious one?
Is “sedition is punishable by death” a problem statement or just a very obvious one?
Posted on 11/27/25 at 1:08 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Is “sedition is punishable by death” a problem statement or just a very obvious one?
Is telling soldier's to disobey illegal orders seditious in some way?
Posted on 11/27/25 at 1:09 pm to GoblinGuide
quote:
Is telling soldier's to disobey illegal orders seditious in some way?
You didn’t answer my question. Is “sedition is punishable by death” a problem statement of just an obvious one?
Or are you saying we are allowed to infer intent?
This post was edited on 11/27/25 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 11/27/25 at 1:10 pm to GoblinGuide
If the intent is pure no.
That is not the case with these cocksuckers.
That is not the case with these cocksuckers.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 1:13 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You didn’t answer my question. Is “sedition is punishable by death” a problem statement of just an obvious one?
Or are you saying we are allowed to infer intent?
You can infer just fine. It won't hold up in a court martial or a court of law however.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News