- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Happy Mother’s Day from Planned Parenthood.
Posted on 5/14/18 at 10:21 am to Wee Bey Brice
Posted on 5/14/18 at 10:21 am to Wee Bey Brice
I'm confused
Have women not had the ability to decide when to become a mother prior to abortion coming about?
Have women not had the ability to decide when to become a mother prior to abortion coming about?
Posted on 5/14/18 at 10:21 am to dawgfan24348
quote:
Kind of ironic but they do way more then just abortions.
But that is where they make the bulk of their money, and what they do most.
Posted on 5/14/18 at 10:23 am to Fat Bastard
quote:
signed, slave owners prior to the civil war.
quote:You mean, like abortion?
correct. still wrong and doesnt make it right.
Posted on 5/14/18 at 10:24 am to VOR
Well to be fair.
"You see this bar? I built this bar with my own bare hands. I cut down every tree and made the lumber myself. I toiled away through the wind and cold, but do they call me McGreggor the bar builder? No."
He continued "Do you see that stone wall out there? I built that wall with my own bare hands. I found every stone and placed them just right through the rain and the mud, but do they call me McGreggor the wall builder? No."
"Do ya see that pier out there on the lake? I built that pier with my own bare hands, driving each piling deep into ground so that it would last a lifetime. Do they call me McGreggor the pier builder? No."
"But ya frick one goat.."
"You see this bar? I built this bar with my own bare hands. I cut down every tree and made the lumber myself. I toiled away through the wind and cold, but do they call me McGreggor the bar builder? No."
He continued "Do you see that stone wall out there? I built that wall with my own bare hands. I found every stone and placed them just right through the rain and the mud, but do they call me McGreggor the wall builder? No."
"Do ya see that pier out there on the lake? I built that pier with my own bare hands, driving each piling deep into ground so that it would last a lifetime. Do they call me McGreggor the pier builder? No."
"But ya frick one goat.."
Posted on 5/14/18 at 10:27 am to AU_251
quote:
My problem with most people on here that are pro-life (i'm middle of the road), is that you all acknowledge how many idiots are in this world, yet you want them all to have children.
If you mean we don't want them to kill their babies, you are correct. It is not the child's fault he has idiots for parents.
quote:Why?
I am all for a way that keeps less children being born.
quote:We could try educating the idiots and their children, instead of killing their children? Just a thought.
There are too many mouthbreathing idiots in this world as it is.
Posted on 5/14/18 at 10:29 am to AU_251
quote:
I can't disagree with most of your post. But there are idiots and bad gene pools that are reproducing more than smarter people.
The true idiots are not the ones getting abortions.....or we would have far fewer idiots, would we not? I mean....abortion has been legal for a while now, hasn't it? Do you see it solving many problems?
Posted on 5/14/18 at 10:35 am to AU_251
quote:I don't believe we have an issue with stupid people reproducing, but for the sake of argument, why isn't the solution to encourage smarter people to have more children as a service to the country and the world? Why is the solution to this problem always forced sterilization or abortion of the "stupid"?
I can't disagree with most of your post. But there are idiots and bad gene pools that are reproducing more than smarter people.
Posted on 5/14/18 at 10:37 am to FooManChoo
Because you can't force the smart people to have children. Tons of smart people go their whole lives without marrying or having children.
Posted on 5/14/18 at 10:40 am to AU_251
quote:I'm not sure I understand you as this seems to be very inconsistent.
Because you can't force the smart people to have children. Tons of smart people go their whole lives without marrying or having children.
If you can force someone to not have children via abortion or sterilization, you can force someone to have children through insemination and punish abortion or purposeful miscarriages for those people.
I mean, if you're going to talk about totalitarian tactics of removing personal freedoms, you have to be consistent.
Posted on 5/14/18 at 1:05 pm to FooManChoo
Well for one, I am mostly kidding.
But I do believe lots of people should procreate less.
But I do believe lots of people should procreate less.
Posted on 5/14/18 at 1:20 pm to Wee Bey Brice
Oxymoronic Mother's Day GOAT (greeting of all time).....

Posted on 5/14/18 at 1:23 pm to AU_251
quote:That's cool
Well for one, I am mostly kidding.
Others aren't when they say they are for forcibly preventing people from procreating and I think that's immoral.
quote:Maybe, but again, to me the issue isn't procreation but the lack of responsibility people have in raising children properly.
But I do believe lots of people should procreate less.
Posted on 5/14/18 at 1:37 pm to Damone
quote:
MUH MAMMOGRAMS
that’s like 2% of what they do
They reportedly possess zero mammogram machines.
This post was edited on 5/14/18 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 5/14/18 at 2:20 pm to Crimson Wraith
LINK
4 things Planned Parenthood's president admitted under oath
BY MATT MACKOWIAK - 10/01/15 07:30 AM EDT
Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards faced direct questioning from Republicans and soft kisses from Democrats.
The real value of the hearing was that, unlike when Richards appears on TV, this time she was under oath. That yielded several admissions.
First, Planned Parenthood often says that abortions are only 3 percent of the services they offer. The Washington Post's "Fact Checker" has given this dubious claim "three Pinocchios." When Richards was asked to divide the number of patients Planned Parenthood saw last year by the number of abortions, the answer was 12 percent. Even more amazingly, when federal funds are exempted, 86 percent of Planned Parenthood's revenue comes from abortions.
Second, Richards and Planned Parenthood advocates regularly claim that women receive mammograms at Planned Parenthood facilities — as she did on CNN in 2011, to give one example. Asked by freshman Rep. Mia Love (R-Utah) if Planned Parenthood facilities offer mammograms, Richards admitted they don't. None of the 650 to 700 facilities offer mammograms, nor do they even have the equipment.
Third, Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn.), the author of the bill to end taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood by shifting the funding to community health centers, asked Richards to explain her claim that her bill would block access for women's health. Community health centers outnumber Planned Parenthood facilities by at least tenfold, and they offer additional services like mammograms that Planned Parenthood does not offer. Richards had no real answer.
Fourth, Rep. Steve Russell (R-Okla.) asked the single most interesting question of the day: If federal funds do not go to abortion services, would ending federal funding reduce abortion services? He cleverly caught Richards in a trap. Admit that federal funding goes to abortion, and Planned Parenthood is violating federal law. Admit that ending federal funding doesn't reduce abortion services, and you undercut the defense of Planned Parenthood's funding. She had no real answer and was clearly stumped.
There were other interesting moments:
After repeatedly claiming that Planned Parenthood was a nonprofit, Richards admitted that, in 2014, her organization had $127 million in excess revenue after expenses (what normal people call a "profit.") Richards also admitted that Planned Parenthood spent $40 million on travel and parties, which breaks down to $13,000 a day.
Planned Parenthood regularly claims that the hidden camera videos that were released were "selectively edited," but two forensic examinations found that to be false. As The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway reported, both forensic reports, including one commissioned by Planned Parenthood, "assert that there is no dubbing or alteration to the audio and no evidence of misrepresentative editing."
4 things Planned Parenthood's president admitted under oath
BY MATT MACKOWIAK - 10/01/15 07:30 AM EDT
Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards faced direct questioning from Republicans and soft kisses from Democrats.
The real value of the hearing was that, unlike when Richards appears on TV, this time she was under oath. That yielded several admissions.
First, Planned Parenthood often says that abortions are only 3 percent of the services they offer. The Washington Post's "Fact Checker" has given this dubious claim "three Pinocchios." When Richards was asked to divide the number of patients Planned Parenthood saw last year by the number of abortions, the answer was 12 percent. Even more amazingly, when federal funds are exempted, 86 percent of Planned Parenthood's revenue comes from abortions.
Second, Richards and Planned Parenthood advocates regularly claim that women receive mammograms at Planned Parenthood facilities — as she did on CNN in 2011, to give one example. Asked by freshman Rep. Mia Love (R-Utah) if Planned Parenthood facilities offer mammograms, Richards admitted they don't. None of the 650 to 700 facilities offer mammograms, nor do they even have the equipment.
Third, Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn.), the author of the bill to end taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood by shifting the funding to community health centers, asked Richards to explain her claim that her bill would block access for women's health. Community health centers outnumber Planned Parenthood facilities by at least tenfold, and they offer additional services like mammograms that Planned Parenthood does not offer. Richards had no real answer.
Fourth, Rep. Steve Russell (R-Okla.) asked the single most interesting question of the day: If federal funds do not go to abortion services, would ending federal funding reduce abortion services? He cleverly caught Richards in a trap. Admit that federal funding goes to abortion, and Planned Parenthood is violating federal law. Admit that ending federal funding doesn't reduce abortion services, and you undercut the defense of Planned Parenthood's funding. She had no real answer and was clearly stumped.
There were other interesting moments:
After repeatedly claiming that Planned Parenthood was a nonprofit, Richards admitted that, in 2014, her organization had $127 million in excess revenue after expenses (what normal people call a "profit.") Richards also admitted that Planned Parenthood spent $40 million on travel and parties, which breaks down to $13,000 a day.
Planned Parenthood regularly claims that the hidden camera videos that were released were "selectively edited," but two forensic examinations found that to be false. As The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway reported, both forensic reports, including one commissioned by Planned Parenthood, "assert that there is no dubbing or alteration to the audio and no evidence of misrepresentative editing."
Posted on 5/14/18 at 2:59 pm to DawgsLife
Team abortion here. One dead cell is a lot cheaper than supporting a living cell for some 70 years. Kill Baby Kill!!!
Posted on 5/14/18 at 3:01 pm to Wee Bey Brice
May they all burn in hell...
Popular
Back to top

0








