- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hakeem Jeffries — We would stop any attempt to remove Mike Johnson.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:44 am to loogaroo
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:44 am to loogaroo
Smart move by Hakeem.
Why remove Johnson from the speakership when Hakeem is passing the Dim agenda through the House courtesy Speaker Johnson, and Hakeem doesn't have to take the heat.
Why remove Johnson from the speakership when Hakeem is passing the Dim agenda through the House courtesy Speaker Johnson, and Hakeem doesn't have to take the heat.
1
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:45 am to loogaroo
Uniparty…Assemble!
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:45 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
Hakeem
Will never be speaker even if his party had the power. He will get tossed when that opportunity comes around.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:46 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
Replacing the loser Mccarthy was never going to be loss, because we were never winning with him.
You had a stronger SOH than you have today. Now the DEMs are running the show entirely.
quote:
I never subscribed to the flawed logic that we have to keep a terrible speaker because the next one might be worse. Keeping a loser around because you're uncertain of the future is always a losing proposition. I'll take the people willing to make a move over those too scared to make a change any day of the week.
muh fight in a nutshell
"we may have lost the battle AND the war, but we got to virtue signal toughness, which was the REAL victory"
quote:
Your way of thinking will always have a loser in the speaker's chair.
Being smarter > irrational aggression for virtue signaling purposes.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They're going to lose so much, you'll get tired of losing.
Do we actually think they'll ever tire of losing, though?
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:47 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
Idk why he’s simping for McCarthy
Nobody is simping for McCarthy, but the GOP was in a much better and stronger position with McCarthy.
KM sucked. The alternative that Gaetz created sucks more and empowers DEMs.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:48 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Do we actually think they'll ever tire of losing, though?
When your worldview permits another layer of the conspiracy to be added at any time, explaining away your failures, no.
Failure is just a reinforcement of being right (in the martyrdom of facing the overwhelming power of the malleable conspiracy against you).
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:50 am to lake chuck fan
Seems like he was bought. Saw a tweet he’s received about 500k from AIPAC
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
When your worldview permits another layer of the conspiracy to be added at any time, explaining away your failures, no.
Failure is just a reinforcement of being right (in the martyrdom of facing the overwhelming power of the malleable conspiracy against you).
The persecution complex is strong with them. They enjoy being perpetual victims.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:52 am to themunch
quote:
Our government don't care about US.
Were you complaining when they helped remove McCarthy?
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:55 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
For all the winning they were promised,
Trust the process?
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:55 am to DisplacedBuckeye
On that note, have you ever seen this?
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:58 am to roadGator
quote:
Trust the process?
"We wanted Biden to win. That's how we expose them."
Posted on 4/30/24 at 11:00 am to SlowFlowPro
I have. It's crazy how they've spent almost 9 years proving some of us correct.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 11:01 am to DisplacedBuckeye
I stumbled upon that doing research on cults (a personal hobby and I mean real cults). I was like...oh. There you go.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 11:07 am to SlowFlowPro
I believe it was early 2016 the first time I called one of them (might have been CptBengal) a cultist. At the time, it was mostly just the impression I had from how fervent they were in defense of Trump. Of course now we know how fricking spot on that has been over the years.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 11:08 am to loogaroo
Hakeem's corporate overlords are telling him to support Johnson.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 11:09 am to DisplacedBuckeye
We can’t expect Trump to go scorched earth this time if we don’t let Biden win.
It will be different this time.
It will be different this time.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 11:10 am to SlowFlowPro
Reading any list of signs of a cult is eye opening based on the reality here.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 11:10 am to DisplacedBuckeye
It's about partisanship, which is just group identity at its heart.
Every thought, concept, talking point, conceptualization, etc. has to flow from that group identity.
That's why people who based their personal philosophies and preferred policies on internal things like values and ideas find it so strange.
Every thought, concept, talking point, conceptualization, etc. has to flow from that group identity.
That's why people who based their personal philosophies and preferred policies on internal things like values and ideas find it so strange.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News