- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Gun Owners of America Funds Challenge to National Firearms Act in SCOTUS
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:08 pm
13
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:09 pm to F73ME
quote:
This could get interesting.
It could, if you throw us a bone or two.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:10 pm to F73ME
quote:
Believing he was following the law, Jeremy posted a video about his new suppressor on Facebook, and ATF swooped in. Rather than simply requiring Jeremy to register his suppressor, the feds instead chose felony prosecution — to make an example of Jeremy, and to intimidate all who resist federal power over guns. Jeremy was indicted, and convicted of possessing an unregistered silencer, and now this veteran is a federal felon.
Yeah. We should totally trust the government.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:11 pm to F73ME
Support, but I'll believe it when I see it. People watch too many movies to think suppressors are useful for anything more than assassinating people.
47 of you love the NFA. Why?
47 of you love the NFA. Why?
This post was edited on 1/16/19 at 11:57 am
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:11 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
It could, if you throw us a bone or two.
We've been throwing you bones for over 200 years.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:13 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Us? What do you progressives want now?
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:15 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Iwantmydamncakeback.jpg
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:17 pm to F73ME
I'd like to see the NFA overturned.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:22 pm to Nguyener
quote:
Yeah. We should totally trust the government.
To be fair, it was a Kansas law saying if a suppressor is built and owned by an individual in Kansas, then it is legal.
The NFA is enforced from the "interstate commerce" clause. Kansas was basically saying if the suppressor never leaves the state then the NFA doesn't apply.
This post was edited on 1/15/19 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:25 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
I'd like to see the NFA overturned.
Absolutely, it is just like Obamacare, policy masquerading as a tax. Except the NFA is worse, it's a tax to access a constitutional right.
If they wanted to ban submachine guns back in the 30's, as well as the amendment in 1986, they should have done it the right way and called it what it is, a ban.
I love how the 1986 ban was called the "Firearm Owners' Protection Act"... just comical.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:27 pm to F73ME
quote:
To be fair, it was an Arkansas law saying if a suppressor is built and owned by an individual in Arkansas, then it is legal.
It was in Kansas, I believe, and they have a similarly worded law. He bough a Kansas made supressor in Kansas. It never left Kansas, the feds found out and boom, off to jail he went, even though there is a law in Kansas that says that the NFA does not apply.
This post was edited on 1/15/19 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:28 pm to RolltidePA
Yeah I edited. My brain farted and added "Ar"
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:29 pm to F73ME
quote:
Finally, Jeremy’s petition argues that, if the Supreme Court continues to uphold the NFA as a “tax,” then it is allowing Congress to impose a tax on a constitutionally-protected right — something which the Supreme Court has long said to be unconstitutional.
GAME
SET
MATCH
screw you, liberals.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:44 pm to roadGator
quote:
Us? What do you progressives want now?
An excerpt or two.
Anything but a vague title and a blind link.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:44 pm to F73ME
hell yea some "common sense" gun reform I can get behind!
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:46 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
An excerpt or two.
Anything but a vague title and a blind link.
They're discussing common sense gun control.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:47 pm to RolltidePA
quote:
He bough a Kansas made supressor in Kansas. It never left Kansas, the feds found out and boom, off to jail he went
frick that.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 4:03 pm to F73ME
quote:
To be fair, it was a Kansas law saying if a suppressor is built and owned by an individual in Kansas, then it is legal.
The NFA is enforced from the "interstate commerce" clause. Kansas was basically saying if the suppressor never leaves the state then the NFA doesn't apply.
I assume the "suppressor" to which they refer is actually a sound suppressor, aka silencer, and not a flash suppressor.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 4:10 pm to finchmeister08
quote:
then it is allowing Congress to impose a tax on a constitutionally-protected right — something which the Supreme Court has long said to be unconstitutional
Does this apply to Trump wanting to "tax" protesters?
This post was edited on 1/15/19 at 4:11 pm
Posted on 1/15/19 at 4:12 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Correct.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News