quote:

---

So getting fired from your job and kicked off of only fans is proof to you that they're winning? Doesn't sound like winning to me

---

You’re missing the point of my statement

She is not winning herself, the Groomer Agenda is winning because more and more weirdos are empowered to share their mental illness in public

Ewww! Lock that crazy ho up for animal abuse.

I’m seeing more and more pet owners that I wonder if they have headed down this path.

The affection I see people show some animals crosses a line for me.

Letting dogs tongue their mouths?
Stimulating the dog’s nipples (aka “rubbing the belly”) and below?

With humans, when we stimulate the pink parts we call that getting on base (1st through 3rd for you autists).

Why does it seem like so many pet owners seem to make a display of getting on base with their dogs? You sick fricks aren’t too far from this nasty bitch.

Look where it got Rex (may he rest in peace).

The heart wants what the heart wants. Sigh.


Given that this woman had been with 6 dogs prior to coming out is it likely that number will increase now that she has? How does that work? Is it likely to increase the % of people bent that way or do they exist and we are just unaware? No doubt some folks may be swayed to experiment if the practice were socially acceptable but would more become devotees of the disgusting behavior in numbers which would be a problem? What problem would it represent other than people doing disgusting things, a characteristic of humans that is not limited to beastiality. Folks are weird. They do all manner of sick stuff and most of the impact on society is negligible. The impact of doing them openly on the individual is the only legitimate reaction that society has at its disposal and will continue to play an important role in maintaining acceptable norms. Always has, always will....

quote:

---

Admitting to bestiality. Has she been arrested yet?

---

She is a dog bruh, this is an animal control issue.

quote:

---

Isn't this animal abuse ?

---

No doubt from a legal standpoint but if the dog is her property she should be free to do anything she chooses with her property as long as no other people are impacted beyond disgust. She is treating those dogs better than most cows and chickens are treated by their owners. If animals could litigate these things themselves its a safe bet that Rover's mistreatment would be handled somewhere down the road when cows and chickens ain't knocked in the head and consumed....waaaaaaayyyyyy down the road. It is disgusting but if it is her property what function does the state have in legislating her use of said property? Outside of it impacting other people I don't see one. Michael Vick was famously taken to task for mistreating animals but was it a proper function of the state? I don't like dog fighting but it ought not be illegal because I don't like it...I don't like collard greens but they are legal.