re: Groomer/Tranny Party in for a rude awakening

quote:

---

No one is afraid of you freaks. We are disgusted.

Idiot.

---

What are you disgusted by? A man in a dress? Thats on you my friend....you choose to be put out by that. Its curious why you would. Maybe you find them attractive? Is OK, the heart wants what the heart wants.

What freak would you say I am? I know y'all believe you possess an uncanny ability to diagnose mental illness by reading an internet message board so you probably also have some knack for evaluating the level of freakishness someone possesses. I will give you a clue...I am not disgusted, scared or in any way put out by a man in a dress. I don't understand it but that's on me, not on the man in a dress. There is all sorts of things in life folks do that I do not understand...eating collard greens, for example. Not for me but to each his own as long as you ain't doing any harm to anyone and a man in a dress is doing no more harm than adults claiming to believe in magic men in the sky and boogeymen in the ground.

quote:

---

You guys think men can have periods and get pregnant and you say we've lost our minds?!

Uh, sure

---

SO who are "you guys"? I for one know full well that a biological male person can neither get pregnant or have a menstrual cycle. I would posit that very few adults do not know this. There is a slightly larger number of people, me included, who know it is entirely possible for a biological female to identify as a male and that person can indeed get pregnant, if they are young enough and healthy and exposed, and can and most likely do have menstrual cycles unless they are on some drug that prevents it. The mistake some of you are making, many doing it intentionally, is mixing up phrases like "man" and "identifies as a man". It is confusing no doubt and, given that the only people bringing it up are conservative republicans pretending that it is the end of civilization because they fear or find a man in a dress disgusting, as if it is in any manner any of their business. not worthy of trying to come to grips with because the number of people involved is miniscule. What is important to try to understand is why so many people on the right are so interested in men in dresses. It is as strange as the infatuation the right has with public restrooms and staring at other people's plumbing....

quote:

---

Something tells me that after the recent events involving child grooming, drag story time, tranny violating women’s spaces that the pendulum will swing back heavy against allowing these mentally ill and morally bankrupt people any control throughout all levels of government both state and federal.

---

This feels different. This seems like a broken pendulum that's never going to swing back. The left has established firm control of every pillar of American society. Academia, entertainment, media, big tech, sports, corporate America, etc. The left and the Marxists have firm control of all of it and they're using their control of education to get the 18-29 age group voting in unprecedented numbers, and they all vote democrat.

This isn't the beginning of a Marxist revolution. It feels like they have already won.

I hope and pray that you are right. Of course progressives will never stop pushing the limits of decency but this appears to be a bridge too far to any normal person, especially as it’s focused on children.

quote:

---

I have zero doubt that you are a pedophile

---

At the very least he's a dress wearer. This subject is obviously personal for him. He can say whatever he wants but I'll never embrace freaks

AwgustaDawg asks:

quote:

---

SO who are "you guys"?

---

Thankfully her/its/his own question is promptly answered and noble crusade position clarified:

quote:

---

...The only people bringing it up [trannies / "pregnant" men] are conservative republicans pretending that it is the end of civilization because they fear or find a man in a dress disgusting...[or in] public restrooms and staring at other people's plumbing.

---

Those damned conservative republicans again? Why are they so anti-Freedom?

Time and time again these bigots (R) are alarmed -- over nothing!

Paranoid conservative fathers watch and fret over a man sashaying into the Ladies Room in a dress just after their 10 year old daughter has entered -- they should just RELAX! This is a perfectly normal scene and process.

Conservative parents also started making a ruckus in Public Libraries over silly dress codes for stylish Drag Queens-in-mini-skirts? Another big problem of our cause. Can't these transphobic prudes ever just live and let live? Can't their filthy minds just focus solely on the Book being read? If little children wind up sitting on Trans-Angels' laps, it's just "love!" And "all love is love!"

We know that any coincidental "Wardrobe Malfunction" where genitalia is inadvertently "aired-out" and exposed to everyone in the Library audience -- is just that -- COINCIDENCE. Deal with it, Conservative Righties!

AwgustaDawg, you are right -- everyone ought to reject the fraud of exclusive Male and Female gender paradigm. Instead let's keep on advancing the REAL truth -- multiple genders do exist. Several hundred.

Drag or flaunting bits of REAL "Mother Nature" in public is true liberty. And true reality. It's why men and womyn -- almost all with at least one foot in the closet -- sacrificed, fought, and died wars. As it concerns our state-guided minor children, their "right-to-choose" and express their true gender is constitutionally protected; NOT the one silly gender assigned to them by the lying, transphobic Nazi Christian Patriarchy.

We can and must "Save Civilization" -- starting at oppressive forums like this. One lobotomy. One lopped off genital-sack assembly at a time.

quote:

---

What are you disgusted by? A man in a dress? Thats on you my friend....you choose to be put out by that. Its curious why you would. Maybe you find them attractive? Is OK, the heart wants what the heart wants.

---

Leave it to a democrat to use homosexuality as a put down. You aren’t special. You are a bigot.

quote:

---

A man exposing his genitalia to women in a locker room is doing no harm?

---

Walking around, taking a shower, changing clothes? No, he isn't doing any measurable "harm." Anyone who thinks those things are "harmful" is living in an outdated Victorian fantasyland.

Whether you are "comfortable" with it is a completely different question versus whether it is "harmful."

The VALID concern is that a predator might pretend to be that person and take the opportunity to do REAL "harm." And the QUESTION is whether complete/absolute exclusion is the only (or best) way to deter that second person.

quote:

---

Walking around, taking a shower, changing clothes? No, he isn't doing any measurable "harm."

---

Interesting. I assume you are a nudist or against laws preventing nudity in public. Do you have a teenage daughter?