- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Governor Abbott releases statement on sgt perry
Posted on 4/10/23 at 5:43 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 4/10/23 at 5:43 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
A generalized fear of the crowd (even if "reasonable") does not justify the Defendant to shoot anyone in the vicinity who happens to be carrying a gun.
The QUESTION is whether the DECEDENT acted in a manner which caused Perry to have a reasonable fear for his (simplified) safety. The evidence on that point is ambiguous, at best.
To quote your avatar…
0
Posted on 4/10/23 at 5:46 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
The evidence on that point is ambiguous, at best.
It’s so ambiguous that the Governor has immediately requested a review in order to grant a pardon.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 9:38 pm to Open Your Eyes
quote:
Why don't you post an example, asswipe?
quote:
13000+ examples, progressive dumbass
I see you are too chickenshite to actually post a substantive response and expose your ignorance.
Another big mouth, hot air poster.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 9:56 pm to 2020_reVISION
quote:
Engaging protestors" is not a crime. In order to claim self-defense there would have to be an act that would require defending himself, which there was. He had an "assault rifle" pointed directly at him, which is a direct threat, & a crime.
Not according to what Perry told the cops in his interview after the incident.
quote:
I believe he was going to aim at me. I didn’t want to give him a chance to aim at me," Perry told Detective Fugitt in the interview.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 9:59 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You haven’t ever practiced any kind of law
How would you know, dolt?
Posted on 4/10/23 at 10:11 pm to the808bass
quote:
She’s pretty fricking dumb.
You're the one who is pretty fricking dumb, Gladis.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 10:16 pm to texridder
How can you not even spell Gladys?
What is your first language and where did your parents immigrate from?
What is your first language and where did your parents immigrate from?
Posted on 4/10/23 at 10:20 pm to tigerbaitlawyer
quote:
The judicial process is not a political one.
Posted on 4/11/23 at 8:41 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
quote:
dumbasse
This is where I stopped reading.
Posted on 4/11/23 at 9:30 pm to Lou Pai
In the United States, the judicial system is supposed to be separate and independent from politics. This means that judges and courts make decisions based on the law and the evidence presented in court, rather than being influenced by political pressure or partisan interests.
The reason for this separation is to ensure that the judiciary can provide fair and impartial decisions that are not influenced by political considerations. This helps to uphold the rule of law and maintain the balance of power between the three branches of government - the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
The separation of powers is a fundamental principle of the U.S. government, enshrined in the Constitution. The legislative branch makes the laws, the executive branch enforces the laws, and the judicial branch interprets the laws. By keeping the judiciary independent from politics, the Constitution ensures that the interpretation of the law is based solely on the facts and the law itself, rather than on political considerations.
In this way, the U.S. judicial system is designed to provide a check and balance on the power of the other branches of government, to prevent abuses of power and to protect the rights of citizens.
The reason for this separation is to ensure that the judiciary can provide fair and impartial decisions that are not influenced by political considerations. This helps to uphold the rule of law and maintain the balance of power between the three branches of government - the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
The separation of powers is a fundamental principle of the U.S. government, enshrined in the Constitution. The legislative branch makes the laws, the executive branch enforces the laws, and the judicial branch interprets the laws. By keeping the judiciary independent from politics, the Constitution ensures that the interpretation of the law is based solely on the facts and the law itself, rather than on political considerations.
In this way, the U.S. judicial system is designed to provide a check and balance on the power of the other branches of government, to prevent abuses of power and to protect the rights of citizens.
Posted on 4/11/23 at 9:31 pm to tigerbaitlawyer
quote:
In the United States, the judicial system is supposed to be separate and independent from politics.
quote:
supposed to be
Nice cut & paste from your 8th grade civics book, but you could have stopped after the first sentence.
Posted on 4/11/23 at 11:37 pm to tigerbaitlawyer
quote:
the judicial system is supposed to be separate and independent from politics
It’s anything but
Posted on 4/12/23 at 12:27 am to tigerbaitlawyer
quote:
In the United States, the judicial system is supposed to be separate and independent from politics. This means that judges and courts make decisions based on the law and the evidence presented in court, rather than being influenced by political pressure or partisan interests.
why did you put lawyer in your name? It’s clear you’ve never actually been in court. Posted on 4/12/23 at 12:28 am to texridder
quote:
How would you know, dolt?
From your post history. You are an uneducated bigoted moron.
Posted on 4/12/23 at 12:29 am to texridder
quote:
I believe he was going to aim at me. I didn’t want to give him a chance to aim at me,"
Supports his defense, dummy.
Posted on 4/12/23 at 9:00 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Then one of them ran toward his car brandishing the kind of scary assault rifle your brethren are so terrified of. He pointed it.
Perry admitted in his police interview that Foster didn't point his gun at Perry:
quote:
I believe he was going to aim at me. I didn’t want to give him a chance to aim at me," Perry told Detective Fugitt in the interview.
Question: What is happening in the red circle on the picture you posted?[
This post was edited on 4/12/23 at 9:48 pm
Page 16 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News