- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: GOP Senators seek bipartisan effort to codify same-sex marriage into law
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:24 am to The Boat
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:24 am to The Boat
quote:
Good thing the Republicans won the house despite them being wet dicks. Gridlock and no stupid new laws is good.
Whatever majority they end with is not going to be enough to block stupid laws. There are enough Mitch type dick suckers to side with the Dims
0
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:24 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Not if it is a Constitutional issue, as determined in Obergefell.
The Supreme Court decides a lot of stuff incorrectly.
Marriage should not be a government issue at all, but so long as it is, states should have the right to regulate it how they choose. Just as with abortion.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:24 am to TxRan2020
quote:
Yeah, cuz that’s the issue we’re all most concerned with at the moment,as we try to make ends meet at the grocery store-geez!
Mean tweets
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:26 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
On one hand, I believe homosexuals deserve every right that I have as an American citizen.
They had the same rights as anyone before gay marriage. They chose not to exercise them.
A man had the ‘right’ to marry a woman.
A woman had the ‘right’ to marry a man
Nowhere did it say people had a right to marry for ‘love’.
I’m not picking on you, but the inability or unwillingness for people to think deeper and logically is the real death knell for the Right side of the political spectrum,
This post was edited on 11/15/22 at 11:45 am
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:27 am to BengalOnTheBay
quote:\
states should have the right to regulate it how they choose. Just as with abortion.
Marriage is good for society and stability.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:28 am to BengalOnTheBay
quote:If it were purely a religious matter and had no tax, inheritance or property consequences (to name just a few), I would tend to agree with you.
Marriage should not be a government issue at all,
It ain't, so I don't.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:30 am to The Boat
quote:Please explain how getting your dick wet is a bad thing. Thx.
Good thing the Republicans won the house despite them being wet dicks
This post was edited on 11/15/22 at 11:31 am
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:31 am to Bossier Ag
Going the wrong direction, great. The government has no business being involved with marriage at all.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:35 am to weagle99
quote:
Nowhere did it say people had a right to marry for ‘love’.
There should be no laws governing marriage. Its one of those nanny issues.
All marriage should be encouraged.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:45 am to AggieHank86
quote:
If it were purely a religious matter and had no tax, inheritance or property consequences (to name just a few), I would tend to agree with you.
Those are all contractual issues. You have to start with the big piece (marriage) and work down from there. It's a long road and it will require baby steps.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:47 am to Knartfocker
quote:
I'm betting it can
I’m sure democrats/rinos are thinking of a way to as I type this.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:50 am to weagle99
quote:
They had the same rights as anyone before gay marriage. They chose not to exercise them.
A man had the ‘right’ to marry a woman.
A woman had the ‘right’ to marry a man
Nowhere did it say people had a right to marry for ‘love’.
I’m not picking on you, but the inability or unwillingness for people to think deeper and logically is the real death knell for the Right side of the political spectrum,
And white men had the 'right' to marry a white woman, but not a black woman in 31 states in the 1960s until the Supreme Court ruled in Loving v Virginia that laws like that were unconstitutional.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:53 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Please explain how getting your dick wet is a bad thing. Thx.
Childish....do better or stop complaining about the lack of decorum on the board.
No wonder there are so few women on the board.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:56 am to junkfunky
quote:
Going the wrong direction, great.
Make conservative gays republican. Take their vote.
You think its the flamers who are wanting marriage?
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:58 am to Bossier Ag
The Government should not be in the "marriage" business. As a Christian, I firmly believe that Biblical "marriage" is inteded to be between a man and a women; however, "Christians" have virtually ruined it with their love of divorce.
I love my current preacher and believe he and his family live what he preaches, but he overemphasizes the sin of homosexuality (something Jesus did not directly address) and never mentions divorce (something Jesus DID directly address). [I won't mention where I disagree with him on alcohol.]
But, as long as the government is in the marriage business, what does it matter if two adults create a binding contract in order for them to share assets and make decisions for each other? I would prefer gays have a "domestic union" with the same rights as marriage, but, we all know that would not be sufficient for the radicals.
As long as it would hold up in the Constitution, I think it would be a good idea to "codify" same-sex marriage as a sign of supporting individual rights (especially considering President Trump was the first president elected who supported gay marriage).
I love my current preacher and believe he and his family live what he preaches, but he overemphasizes the sin of homosexuality (something Jesus did not directly address) and never mentions divorce (something Jesus DID directly address). [I won't mention where I disagree with him on alcohol.]
But, as long as the government is in the marriage business, what does it matter if two adults create a binding contract in order for them to share assets and make decisions for each other? I would prefer gays have a "domestic union" with the same rights as marriage, but, we all know that would not be sufficient for the radicals.
As long as it would hold up in the Constitution, I think it would be a good idea to "codify" same-sex marriage as a sign of supporting individual rights (especially considering President Trump was the first president elected who supported gay marriage).
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:59 am to Bossier Ag
they need to, for the sake of the repulican party they need to. If this goes back to the states GOP states will pass laws that dont allow for gay marraige. Then the GOP will loose every national election for the next 10yrs. You thought aboartion turned out the vote..
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:59 am to AUauditor
quote:
As long as it would hold up in the Constitution, I think it would be a good idea to "codify" same-sex marriage as a sign of supporting individual rights
Republicans should go for all conservatives. Gay, black, hispanic...don't matter.
Support them and give them a reason to vote.
Any gay men who loathe the current tranny fad are ok with me. They are probably tired of those people hijacking their group.
This post was edited on 11/15/22 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 11/15/22 at 12:08 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Marriage is good for society and stability.
“Gay marriage” isn’t marriage.
Marriage is good for society because it provides a building block for society. No-fault divorce is shite for society because it’s largely destructive. Over 40% of gay relationships are “open” relationships. Homosexuals cannot naturally procreate.
We can keep pretending there’s no natural law. But it’s still there.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 12:11 pm to the808bass
quote:
Marriage is good for society because it provides a building block for society.
Long term legal commitments are fantastic for society as they provide stability.
I really can't understand people wanting unbridled hedonism over stability.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 12:12 pm to the808bass
quote:
We can keep pretending there’s no natural law. But it’s still there.
This will go over a lot of people's heads, but it is true.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News