- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Global warming question for both sides....
Posted on 2/17/14 at 8:47 pm to Urban OhiO
Posted on 2/17/14 at 8:47 pm to Urban OhiO
quote:
Ozone layer isn't what it once was padna.
You are such a troll.

Posted on 2/17/14 at 8:51 pm to Urban OhiO
quote:
Ozone layer isn't what it once was panda
Trollololololol


Posted on 2/17/14 at 8:53 pm to MagicCityBlazer
And quite a successful one, you should see my work on the SECr. 

Posted on 2/18/14 at 6:58 am to Upperaltiger06
quote:
Not I or the vast majority of scientists who study this field. Sounds like you've got everything figured out.
quote:
Upperaltiger06
From your link:
quote:Causation or correlation?
Similarly, at the end of the last Ice Age, 10,000 years ago, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere rose dramatically as temperatures warmed.
Posted on 2/18/14 at 7:35 am to NC_Tigah
so, to get a little back on point...
why is it when a storm like Sandy hits New York, and it's the worst since xxxx year, do the liberal media and other ididots believe it was caused by climate change but the older was a natural occurrence?
why is it when a storm like Sandy hits New York, and it's the worst since xxxx year, do the liberal media and other ididots believe it was caused by climate change but the older was a natural occurrence?
Posted on 2/18/14 at 8:39 am to Upperaltiger06
quote:I don't think your numbers are right.
1 ton of coal burned produces 5,720 lbs. of CO2.
Posted on 2/18/14 at 8:55 am to Mindenfan
1 pound of carbon combines with 2.667 pounds of oxygen to produce 3.667 pounds of carbon dioxide.....granted this is under ideal conditions.
Posted on 2/18/14 at 10:25 am to GeeOH
quote:
SO my question is, what was the cause of the event in the past? Or Dems arguing that the climate change is actually a "returning to past" climate change? All of these events have a history of happening in the past. So why is today considered "change".
Whoa.
That's deeply vague.
Posted on 2/18/14 at 11:39 am to GeeOH
quote:
SO my question is, what was the cause of the event in the past?
Impossible to come up with 'causality' for a very, very complex system such as the Earth's atmosphere. All who try are wasting their time.
quote:
Or Dems arguing that the climate change is actually a "returning to past" climate change?
Yes, their arguments around this issue are asinine.
The Democrats should take the position that businesses producing effluents, discharged to atmosphere, shall always have the 'burden-of-proof' on them. The bigger the point-source of pollution, the more harm it could possibly cause. IOW, 100 LB/HR pollution from one heater stack is much more of a concern than 1 LB/HR pollution from 100 individual point-sources.
Posted on 2/18/14 at 12:28 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
It's like anything, 20% make the most noise.
Pareto was a dick.
Popular
Back to top
