- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fulton County admits they did not follow the rules.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:47 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Fulton County admits they did not follow the rules.
by SlowFlowPro
Yes, this has been discussed about 10x on here.
Due to the clerical error, Trump could have won GA. It would not have swung the election, though.
However, this error doesn't indicate the type of fraud oft-referenced in "The Steal"
You have shite for brains.
0
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:54 am to SlowFlowPro
Its not a pivot because you were arguing that the hand counts alleviated the concerns.
Where are the ballots that were “hand counted” which “alleviated the concerns”? Why is Fulton not in compliance with state law?
My guess is that it would expose more discrepancies like the below, and there are a shite ton of these out there (across multiple levels of the ballot organizing process—not just duplicate ballots) which were NOT caught by safeguards in the system, but rather by independents.
This is not conspiracy theory nonsense, this is official data from the election which was released to the public.
quote:
And the missing signatures only are an issue if the machines weren't at 0 votes. The hand counts alleviated the concerns.
Where are the ballots that were “hand counted” which “alleviated the concerns”? Why is Fulton not in compliance with state law?
My guess is that it would expose more discrepancies like the below, and there are a shite ton of these out there (across multiple levels of the ballot organizing process—not just duplicate ballots) which were NOT caught by safeguards in the system, but rather by independents.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This is not conspiracy theory nonsense, this is official data from the election which was released to the public.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 11:56 am
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:00 pm to G2160
quote:
Its not a pivot because you were arguing that the hand counts alleviated the concerns.
The hand counts exist and are a factual piece of data.
They disprove your argument, so you're trying to pivot to a conspiracy theory attacking them. I'm just calling you out for this.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And the missing signatures only are an issue if the machines weren't at 0 votes.
No. It's an issue regardless. There is no way to verify the machines were at zero without the signatures.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:08 pm to loogaroo
Maybe that's what they call "accidents" 
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The hand counts exist and are a factual piece of data.
Correction: what we are told was the hand count exists.
The images of these ballots (and probably the ballots themselves) exist.
Georgia law says the public is supposed to have access to these images.
Fulton is NOT allowing public access to these images which could confirm the hand count.
Fulton could not (or did not want to) perform basic accountability across 315k ballots, and you are happy to accept what they tell you about what the hand count was.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:08 pm to G2160
There is a simple way to fix this. The Democrats will fight it, because they are stealing elections pure and simple.
We have a single election day. NO MORE MAIL IN BALLOTS. Declare a National Holiday so everyone has an opportunity. Only the military can vote absentee. You want to vote? Show up. People out of the country can vote at the nearest US Consulate but you have to show up have ID and proof you are a registered voter.
Paper Ballots. Voter ID. You must be registered. If you can't manage to get that done in 2 freaking years then stay home.
If anyone can give a valid argument against voter registration and voter ID step right up. There isn't one.
We have a single election day. NO MORE MAIL IN BALLOTS. Declare a National Holiday so everyone has an opportunity. Only the military can vote absentee. You want to vote? Show up. People out of the country can vote at the nearest US Consulate but you have to show up have ID and proof you are a registered voter.
Paper Ballots. Voter ID. You must be registered. If you can't manage to get that done in 2 freaking years then stay home.
If anyone can give a valid argument against voter registration and voter ID step right up. There isn't one.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:10 pm to loogaroo
quote:
There is no way to verify the machines were at zero without the signatures.
This is patently false. The recounts verified just this
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The recounts verified just this
How?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:14 pm to loogaroo
quote:
How?
By counting the other evidence of the votes.
Then they compared to the machine numbers.
There are more ways to verify the number of people who voted than just the machine results, you do realize this, right?
Like in Louisiana, we sign a book before we vote. If there was ever an issue about voting totals at machines, you compare the signatures at the precinct to the machine results.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
Fox guarding the henhouse counselor. Who did the recounts? The same people that screwed the thing up to start with? If so we can't trust that.
They confessed counselor. They did not follow election law, Not election suggestion. LAW. You're allegedly an officer of the court you should be outraged.
They confessed counselor. They did not follow election law, Not election suggestion. LAW. You're allegedly an officer of the court you should be outraged.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
By counting the other evidence of the votes.
Why do you think Fulton isn’t releasing ballot images?
Is the public not owed this level of transparency?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:17 pm to antibarner
quote:
Fox guarding the henhouse counselor. Who did the recounts? The same people that screwed the thing up to start with? If so we can't trust that.
Non-relevant conspiracy pivot.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:18 pm to G2160
quote:
Why do you think Fulton isn’t releasing ballot images?
Is the public not owed this level of transparency?
Do you want to discuss the 315k vote situation or something else? It seems like you want to discuss something else.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Democrats put Biden's victory in jeopardy all over the country?
They knew no one had the balls to go through with voiding the illegal mail in votes.
Joe Biden got nowhere close to 81 million votes from real willing voters. It’s laughable, really.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There are more ways to verify the number of people who voted than just the machine results, you do realize this, right?
Yes, but in this instance those votes could be fraudulent. There's no way to know.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
I am discussing how the hand count—which you say holds the machine process accountable—can be verified.
Just answer the question:
Why won’t Fulton allow access to these images?
Just answer the question:
Why won’t Fulton allow access to these images?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:27 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Yes, but in this instance those votes could be fraudulent.
But those fraudulent votes still wouldn't match the machine counts, if the machines weren't a 0.
Otherwise you'd have to have a massive operation where people are somehow going in after the fact to create the receipts and data to match the numbers, which is effectively impossible.
A theory based on actual fraudulent votes could work. The above conspiracy could not.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:29 pm to G2160
They are also refusing to comply with federal laws that require them to release registration lists to the DOJ.
The civil rights division was forced to sue Fulton county for these records. A predawn no knock raid of Ratfricks house seems appropriate. SloFag doesn’t have any problems with those.
Probably just moar clerical errors, I’m sure.
The civil rights division was forced to sue Fulton county for these records. A predawn no knock raid of Ratfricks house seems appropriate. SloFag doesn’t have any problems with those.
Probably just moar clerical errors, I’m sure.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Otherwise you'd have to have a massive operation where people are somehow going in after the fact to create the receipts and data to match the numbers, which is effectively impossible.
It is most certainly not impossible and we have proof that there were duplicate ballots and incorrect vote batch totals in GA in the 2020 election.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 12:32 pm
Page 16 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News