- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fox’s Judge Napolitano: CNN Has a ‘Very Good Case’ Against the White House
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:41 pm to tigerinDC09
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:41 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
I think it is significant
I don't think it is as significant as you think it is...
0
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:41 pm to tigerinDC09
In his declaration in support of CNN's suit against White House officials, @acosta claims that @realDonaldTrump rhetoric has had a direct impact on his life.
98
9:09 AM - Nov 13, 2018
98
9:09 AM - Nov 13, 2018
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:41 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Looks like it isn't a frivolous lawsuit after all.
Is one attorney giving their opinion what it takes to convince you? Can we apply this across the board, or just to those opinions that confirm your bias? Moron.
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:42 pm to Jbird
quote:
In his declaration in support of CNN's suit against White House officials, @acosta claims that @realDonaldTrump rhetoric has had a direct impact on his life.
Sweet fancy tap-dancing Moses.
What a fricking pussy.
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:42 pm to Godfather1
quote:
Sleep late this morning? This is quite a bit later in the day than usual for one of your sky screams. You’re usually the entertainment over my first cup of joe.
I was too happy with the Amazon deal to let the ignorance of some in here bring me down.
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:42 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
quote:
Yeah I didn't get the "danger" part. I like Nap, but I don't understand his reasoning here.
Precedent is precedent. You can't just warp history to allows the actions of Trump.
Huh? I was just asking if anyone in the administration used "danger to the president" as their rationale for giving Jim the boot. I didn't understand where he was going with that point.
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:43 pm to Y.A. Tittle
"A republican said x, so you guy are dumb for not believing it too!"
Refreshing stuff
Refreshing stuff
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:43 pm to tigerinDC09
Well hell,
I'm going to start a blog, call myself a journalist, and demand my seat in the Whitehouse.
I'm going to start a blog, call myself a journalist, and demand my seat in the Whitehouse.
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:43 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
think it is significant when your top legal correspondent on Fox News is blasting the talking points of it's opinion people.
That’s because you are ignorant and believe the trite “faux news” talking points. Fox News is fair and balanced. Now you see that.
This post was edited on 11/13/18 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:44 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Is one attorney giving their opinion what it takes to convince you? Can we apply this across the board, or just to those opinions that confirm your bias? Moron.
Every legal analyst I've seen on Fox News and MSNBC has affirmed the precedent that Judge Nap brought up.
You may not like it, but that's how the law works.
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:44 pm to tigerinDC09
You're really going all-in on defending Acosta's behavior.
That makes you very weird.
That makes you very weird.
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:44 pm to tigerinDC09
Would be interesting to see a court claim that anyone has a right to a press pass.
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:45 pm to jawnybnsc
quote:
Why does ANYONE have a RIGHT to be in the WH Press Briefing Room? I don't get it.
In fact, the president is under no obligation to do briefings at all.
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:45 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Every legal analyst I've seen on Fox News and MSNBC has affirmed the precedent that Judge Nap brought up. You may not like it, but that's how the law works.
ignoring your appeal to authority. Please describe to us your legal background and your expertise which allows you to claim “that’s how the law works”. Moron. Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:46 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Huh? I was just asking if anyone in the administration used "danger to the president" as their rationale for giving Jim the boot. I didn't understand where he was going with that point.
Oh, When Sarah put out that doctored video and claimed Acosta inappropriately touched her.
You seem to forget that Twitter is an official medium and can be used in a court of law.
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:46 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Looks like it isn't a frivolous lawsuit after all.
Um, no, it is a frivolous lawsuit after all.
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:46 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
that doctored video
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:47 pm to DarthRebel
quote:
And he never gets called on again.
This is what I want to see. Let him back and then hold daily briefings, gaggles, whatever and never call on him.
When President has a presser, he takes a question from every other outlet except CNN.
See how long ol CNN keeps Acosta there.
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:47 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
how the law works.
Which law says that a press pass is a right?
Which law applies to the attendees of a presidential briefing?
Does this same law say where someone is to be seated? How many questions they get per day, week, or month?
Posted on 11/13/18 at 1:47 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Looks like it isn't a frivolous lawsuit after al
And why are you defending a man who assaults women?
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News