Started By
Message

re: Fox Sports Marcellus Wiley says it’s not guns, it’s about people

Posted on 6/2/22 at 7:28 am to
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
35201 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 7:28 am to
Even though we all see that you are more than likely a paid troll (99% probability), your deflection (without substance) must be addressed. Define the following as it relates to the USA (in compared to France) from the 1950’s and prior.

quote:

They were common before that as well.
This post was edited on 6/2/22 at 7:29 am
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73556 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 7:29 am to
Alterboy hard at it already this morning.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
35201 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 7:31 am to
quote:

Alterboy hard at it already this morning.


The irony is that they are probably a hard core, goose-stepping, leftist communazi...but they sure seem to love to some capitalism and “share blue.” I guarantee you that this shite bag is knee deep into DU.
Posted by HughsWorkPhone
Member since Sep 2017
1162 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 7:33 am to
quote:

Remind me, how many mass shootings happen in France again?


Remind me of that truck a few years ago that killed around 70…

quote:

On the evening of 14 July 2016, a 19-tonne cargo truck was deliberately driven into crowds of people celebrating Bastille Day on the Promenade des Anglais in Nice, France, resulting in the deaths of 86 people and the injury of 458 others. The driver was Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel, a Tunisian living in France. Wikipedia


Seems like it’s still just as easy to kill a bunch of people
This post was edited on 6/2/22 at 7:37 am
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
69378 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 7:35 am to
quote:

Remind me of that truck a few years ago that killed around 70…


It was 86 and another 400+ injured.

130 were killed in the Paris attacks. What did the Muslims use? Guns and explosives.

This post was edited on 6/2/22 at 7:37 am
Posted by DiscountedCashFlow
Member since May 2022
243 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 7:39 am to
quote:

The irony is that they are probably a hard core, goose-stepping, leftist communazi...but they sure seem to love to some capitalism and “share blue.” I guarantee you that this shite bag is knee deep into DU.



I'm very capitalist - I'm not sure where I've said the opposite.

I'm culturally liberal and economically right-wing to an extent.

Lower taxes, more immigration, more free trade, more globalization, less regulation.

quote:

this shite bag is knee deep into DU.


What's DU?
This post was edited on 6/2/22 at 7:40 am
Posted by DiscountedCashFlow
Member since May 2022
243 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 7:41 am to
quote:

It was 86 and another 400+ injured.
130 were killed in the Paris attacks. What did the Muslims use? Guns and explosives.


And even including that, total homicides per 100,000 are much lower in France than the US. This is excluding gang crime homicides.

It takes much more planning and intervention to get weapons/a bomb -> the barrier to entry is higher as much as people claim otherwise.

If you're an 18-year-old with no terrorist links in France, it's much harder to get your hands on a weapon if you want to carry out an attack.

Furthermore, bombs are more difficult to build and to build successfully enough that they kill large numbers of people. You'd need terrorist networks or significant know-how to do so.
This post was edited on 6/2/22 at 7:42 am
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
69378 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 7:52 am to
I’m just pointing out recent mass killings that the body count was higher than the mass shooter. But again these were done by Islamic extremists. So I guess they don’t count.

Posted by kmdawg17
'Murica
Member since Sep 2015
1525 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Marcellus Wiley


Uh oh...hoppin Bob gonna get him for stepping over the gun line
Posted by DiscountedCashFlow
Member since May 2022
243 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Define the following as it relates to the USA (in compared to France) from the 1950’s and prior.


LINK .

The homicide rate in the US was even higher in the 1970s than they are today at around 8.8 compared with 5.9 today. In the 1950s, it was around what it is today. In France, it was around 0.9 in the 1970s and is around 1.31 today.

LINK

Mass shootings were still common in the US as well if you want to look at mass shootings in particular.

Taken from Krouse and Richardson (2013)

• one (1.1) incident per year during the 1970s (5.5 victims murdered, 2.0 wounded
per incident),

• nearly three (2.7) incidents per year during the 1980s (6.1 victims murdered, 5.3 wounded per incident),

• four (4.0) incidents per year during the 1990s (5.6 victims murdered, 5.5
wounded per incident),

• four (4.1) incidents per year during the 2000s (6.4 victims murdered, 4.0
wounded per incident),

• four (4.5) incidents per year from 2010 through 2013 (7.4 victims murdered, 6.3
wounded per incident).

If you go to Figure 9, it will show you that when we look at *victims* as a rate, the mass public shooting rate has not increased that much since the 1970s. When we look at victims per firearm, it's actually declined so the 1970s-2020s weren't really that safe either.

Alas, I am not paid -> this is a labor of love.

So while it is more common now, it wasn't uncommon back then either.



This post was edited on 6/2/22 at 8:03 am
Posted by HughsWorkPhone
Member since Sep 2017
1162 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 7:55 am to
quote:

It takes much more planning and intervention to get weapons/a bomb -> the barrier to entry is higher as much as people claim otherwise.


Did this guy use a bomb or just a truck?
Posted by DiscountedCashFlow
Member since May 2022
243 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 7:56 am to
quote:

I’m just pointing out recent mass killings that the body count was higher than the mass shooter. But again these were done by Islamic extremists. So I guess they don’t count.


The body count isn't higher though when you look at homicides as a rate.

And they absolutely count, which is why they were included in the homicide figures I've provided.



Posted by sugarbuzz
Badstreet USA
Member since May 2022
377 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 7:58 am to
quote:

And they absolutely count, which is why they were included in the homicide figures I've provided.


You used Mother Jones as a source.

Anything and everything you post on this board from that moment should be considered either a lie or inaccurate.
Posted by sugarbuzz
Badstreet USA
Member since May 2022
377 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 7:59 am to
BTW, what is the location of the bridge you live under and exactly how many goats do you consume per day?

Also, what was your previous user name before assuming this alter?

Sugar
Posted by DiscountedCashFlow
Member since May 2022
243 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 8:00 am to
quote:

Did this guy use a bomb or just a truck?


Which guy? I mean there have been people who do use trucks but vehicles as a homicide device are much more inefficient.

You can't use them indoors nor are they really useful in non-crowded situations (because if people are spread out, it's more difficult to manoeuvre).

And where there are crowds, they can be blocked by using blocks or other methods.



Posted by DiscountedCashFlow
Member since May 2022
243 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 8:02 am to
quote:

You used Mother Jones as a source.


I used it as a starting definition.

I took no data from there as a source.

quote:

Anything and everything you post on this board from that moment should be considered either a lie or inaccurate.


I mean it's literally just the FBI definition of a mass shooting here but okay.
Posted by DiscountedCashFlow
Member since May 2022
243 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 8:05 am to
quote:


The problem here is a lot of this is Islamic terrorist stuff. So I guess we got to leave those out. They don’t count. Just looking the majority of the mass killings in France since 2012 were done by Islamic extremists.


These sorts of attacks in the homicide figures are accounted for.

France is a relatively violent Western country. But compared to the US, it almost pales in significance (and that's just the white population at that).

American Blacks have a homicide offending rate of over 25-30 per 100,000.

American whites have as homicide offending rate of around 5 per 100,000.

The French homicide rate (including those terror attacks) is around 1.3 today per 100,000.

Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
35201 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 8:10 am to
quote:

What's DU?


Posted by sugarbuzz
Badstreet USA
Member since May 2022
377 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 8:11 am to
quote:

I used it as a starting definition.....I mean it's literally just the FBI definition of a mass shooting here but okay.


If you weren't a troll and or an idiot Communist, you would have just used the FBI source.

You cited Mother Jones because you wanted a reaction.

You suck at this.

What was your previous user name?
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73556 posts
Posted on 6/2/22 at 8:12 am to
quote:

What was your previous user name?
FightingFiduciary is another of this frick's alters.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram