- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fox, CNN, CBS, ABC, and NBC refuse to sign new Pentagon press rules.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:28 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:28 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Sorry but who trusts the media with national security? The media has aggregation news from the DNC, not independence.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
1
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:29 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
The entire Pentagon should be a restricted area. They do not have the right to just roam around free with out credentials showing. Military on military bases have to have credentials showing to go into restricted areas.
This post was edited on 10/14/25 at 7:44 pm
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:30 pm to LSURulzSEC
Seems reasonable to have these restrictions. There was an old saying in WW II “Loose lips sink ships”. I am appalled there were no restrictions before. I had to go through security checks etc to work on the grounds at Redstone Arsenal. Why do these arrogant pricks think they get to roam free?
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:31 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
When is the last time ABC, NBC, CBS or CNN had a diverging editorial opinion?
They are redundant/unnecessary.
They are redundant/unnecessary.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:31 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Military kicking cia out of the pentagon? I'll allow it.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:43 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:In my opinion, too many people floating around like that made it impossible to track leaks. Now, they can 'internally' leak false information to someone suspected of leaking and if the info ends up in the press then they know that the suspect is the leaker and can deal with it and make an example of him/her.
So in other words, they don't want the press reporting leaks.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:46 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
frick em. You lose. Back of the bus, losers.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:48 pm to HubbaBubba
IMHO the media shouldn't even be allowed to obtain restricted area badges at all. They should have to be escorted by someone that has a restricted area escort badge.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:49 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I call them FAKE FOX for a reason.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:50 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
That'll stop some leaks...
Posted on 10/14/25 at 8:02 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
It is about time those complicit in promoting an anti-American agenda are more than willing to prove who they are.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 8:19 pm to Bamanjo
I work at a top 50 corporation in DFW. Anyone who is not an employee must be registered with security on every visit to the campus. Each person gets a temporary “badge” with their picture on it and it’s attached to a bright red lanyard that says escort required. Security checks this all the time throughout the campus. This happens daily and we are not the Pentagon.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 9:08 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Good. Bring on the legitimate Podcasters who actually, accurately report the news.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 10:47 pm to cajunangelle
Yeah this doesn't really change anything. They've run with a bunch of dejected deep staters, quoting "sources close to the situation" and continue to lie profusely. Nothing stops them from continuing to do this, but the lies will just be easier to expose.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 10:58 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
he entire Pentagon should be a restricted area
Everyone, badged or not, had to go through a metal detector the last time I was inside (admittedly, before 9/11, or does that make it worse?)
It's ludicrous they had that level of access to begin with. Countries that don't like us can just ride the metro, and glean plenty from people that are trying to prove how important they are, which is all DC really is. One OPSEC violation after another, on nearly every ride.
And yet, when people are in their workplace, with other people who swore an oath, and have been background checked and have a clearance, speak as if there is some level of trust they can place in someone eating lunch at the next park bench. They shouldn't, especially for SCI info, but they will.
Posted on 10/15/25 at 12:33 am to Bamanjo
Posted on 10/15/25 at 2:42 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Trump not only does things I voted for, he gets those I hate to act like I want them to, like dogs performing tricks.
Posted on 10/15/25 at 5:22 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Newsmax and Fox News also refused to sign.
In fact, only one news outlet has signed.
One America news.
In fact, only one news outlet has signed.
One America news.
Posted on 10/15/25 at 5:27 am to Brosef Stalin
quote:
What exactly are these new rules and why are they so bad?
They can’t roam the freely. They must wear badges. BTW, they’ve never roamed freely and they’ve always worn badges.
The ones that news organizations have the most problems with are: Prohibition of unauthorized solicitation: Journalists cannot ask for or encourage the disclosure of any information not explicitly authorized for release by the Pentagon.
Vague "security risk" clause: The policy states that soliciting unapproved information "may weigh in the consideration of whether you pose a security or safety risk".
It sounds like more of an employee problem with the latter two rules
This post was edited on 10/15/25 at 5:41 am
Posted on 10/15/25 at 5:44 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
What are the new rules?
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News