- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Former US DOJ Double arse’t AG Jeff Clark explains how the 84 million is illegal.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 1:37 pm to Riverside
Posted on 1/27/24 at 1:37 pm to Riverside
quote:
I was thinking about this when I read the reports of the verdict. Punitive damages cannot exceed a certain ratio to underlying damages, so the verdict likely won’t hold up on appeal. The res judicata issue is interesting. The judge should not have bifurcated the trials like he did.
There is nothing about this case that would hold up in a rational court from start to finish. This is a case of a leftist financed kook put into a extremist partisan kangaroo court to get Trump. They should all be jailed for denying Trump his constitutional rights under the color of law.
quote:
18 U.S.C. § 241
Conspiracy Against Rights
Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States or because of his or her having exercised such a right.
Unlike most conspiracy statutes, §241 does not require, as an element, the commission of an overt act.
The offense is always a felony, even if the underlying conduct would not, on its own, establish a felony violation of another criminal civil rights statute. It is punishable by up to ten years imprisonment unless the government proves an aggravating factor (such as that the offense involved kidnapping aggravated sexual abuse, or resulted in death) in which case it may be punished by up to life imprisonment and, if death results, may be eligible for the death penalty.
Section 241 is used in Law Enforcement Misconduct and Hate Crime Prosecutions. It was historically used, before conspiracy-specific trafficking statutes were adopted, in Human Trafficking prosecutions.
MISCONDUCT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT & OTHER GOVERNMENT ACTORS
18 U.S.C. § 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It is not necessary that the offense be motivated by racial bias or by any other animus.
Defendants act under color of law when they wield power vested by a government entity. Those prosecuted under the statute typically include police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards. However other government actors, such as judges, district attorneys, other public officials, and public school employees can also act under color of law and can be prosecuted under this statute.
Section 242 does not criminalize any particular type of abusive conduct. Instead, it incorporates by reference rights defined by the Constitution, federal statutes, and interpretive case law. Cases charged by federal prosecutors most often involve physical or sexual assaults. The Department has also prosecuted public officials for thefts, false arrests, evidence-planting, and failing to protect someone in custody from constitutional violations committed by others.
A violation of the statute is a misdemeanor, unless prosecutors prove one of the statutory aggravating factors such as a bodily injury, use of a dangerous weapon, kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse, death resulting, or attempt to kill, in which case there are graduated penalties up to and including life in prison or death. If charged in conjunction with 18 U.S.C. § 250, as noted below, all sexual assaults under color of law are felonies.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 1:38 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
They should all be jailed for denying Trump his constitutional rights under the color of law.

Posted on 1/27/24 at 1:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
Why would the trial court agree to this case when the first case is on appeal?
It is on appeal?
It is on appeal?
Posted on 1/27/24 at 1:44 pm to Macduff
quote:
Registered on: 12/2/2023
Go back to DU and exercise your hamstrings with your friends in the Democratic Party:
Posted on 1/27/24 at 1:44 pm to KiwiHead
I think there are 2 separate cases with 2 separate torts.
*ETA: I think she's filed at least 1 more that's not in trial posture yet
*ETA: I think she's filed at least 1 more that's not in trial posture yet
This post was edited on 1/27/24 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 1/27/24 at 1:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
Stop wasting bandwidth and post less.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 1:58 pm to Auburn1968
Says the crazy person LARPing 
Posted on 1/27/24 at 2:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
I see the 2 torts angle, but isn't the 5 million one on appeal? Why would Kaplan agree to hear the second case on a matter stemming from that case? Why would that be allowed?
Posted on 1/27/24 at 2:02 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
Why would Kaplan agree to hear the second case on a matter stemming from that case? Why would that be allowed?
Posted on 1/27/24 at 3:27 pm to TDTOM
It makes no sense to rely on the law to solve problems that are a result of a a corrupt judicial system.
There’s no validity to the system when truth and fairness are no longer a requirement.
Solutions must be found elsewhere.
There’s no validity to the system when truth and fairness are no longer a requirement.
Solutions must be found elsewhere.
Popular
Back to top

1





