- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
For those waiting for the next chapter of wokeness, HEEEERRREE'S...‘CONSENSUAL INCEST!
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:14 pm
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:14 pm
For all the lefty slippery slope scoffers who think it's okay to allow your kids to chop their cocks & tiddies off as minors, what say you about the parent that then wants to marry the mutant? I mean, they're in love after all?
From the linked article.
Welp, at least now we know why the Antifags look like a bunch of mutants.
Seriously. We now have consensual incest advocates?
NY Post
NY Post
quote:
Consensual incest advocates are rooting for an anonymous New York parent who wants to marry their own adult child.
Australian Richard Morris, who is pushing to change incest laws in about 60 countries, said he supports the legal push in Manhattan Federal Court and that such behavior between consenting adults “should not be criminalized.”
*****
Fighting for true “marriage equality” is “the right thing to do, isn’t it?” Morris said.
“It seems to be as unjust as the law that used to imprison gay people, and the law that used to stop people of different races marrying,” he added.
From the linked article.
quote:
A New Yorker who wants to marry their own adult offspring is suing to overturn laws barring the incestuous practice, calling it a matter of “individual autonomy.”
The pining parent seeks to remain anonymous because their request is “an action that a large segment of society views as morally, socially and biologically repugnant,” according to court papers.
“Through the enduring bond of marriage, two persons, whatever relationship they might otherwise have with one another, can find a greater level of expression, intimacy and spirituality,” the parent argues in the Manhattan federal court claim filed April 1.
Welp, at least now we know why the Antifags look like a bunch of mutants.
Seriously. We now have consensual incest advocates?
NY Post
NY Post
35
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:15 pm to PhDoogan
The fall of Rome.
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:15 pm to PhDoogan
"It's just about letting gays and lesbians get married, nothing more. There is no slippery slope." - Gay activists in the mid-1990s
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:16 pm to PhDoogan
Roll Tide!!
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:16 pm to PhDoogan
DOES NOT COMPUTE.....
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:18 pm to PhDoogan
I mean, it’s fricked up as all hell and I condemn it, but yeah if they are two consenting adults over 18, I don’t think they should be thrown in jail for it. It’s fricking sick, but if a party isn’t directly harmed, then I don’t see why I have any business telling others what to do.
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:19 pm to bird35
quote:
Roll Tide!!
It crossed my mind, but this kind of humor is best left to intrastate rivalries.
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:19 pm to PhDoogan
A culture is measured by what they will permit/tolerate.
We're really scraping the bottom.
We're really scraping the bottom.
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:22 pm to PhDoogan
Jesus has to be packing his things and just around the corner!
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:23 pm to PhDoogan
I’m old enough to remember when they said there wasn’t a slippery slope.
ETA:
I think the offspring has a case of being directly harmed.
ETA:
quote:
mean, it’s fricked up as all hell and I condemn it, but yeah if they are two consenting adults over 18, I don’t think they should be thrown in jail for it. It’s fricking sick, but if a party isn’t directly harmed, then I don’t see why I have any business telling others what to do.
I think the offspring has a case of being directly harmed.
This post was edited on 4/17/21 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:23 pm to PhDoogan
Absolutely disgusting. Of course it’s in New York. Nasty bastards
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:27 pm to hottub
quote:
I think the offspring has a case of being directly harmed.
That’s where I’m a bit iffy on it. Sex, it’s disgusting, but I think it should be legal. I’m on the fence about consensual adult incest when it comes to rearing children. I’m just a freedom absolutist to where you should be able to do really anything so long as there isn’t a harmed third party... and you can argue that kid of incest is a harmed third party.
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:30 pm to PhDoogan
quote:
Fighting for true “marriage equality” is “the right thing to do, isn’t it?” Morris said.
Marriage to rocks and cars and love dolls should be first.
This post was edited on 4/17/21 at 6:48 pm
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:30 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
I mean, it’s fricked up as all hell and I condemn it, but yeah if they are two consenting adults over 18, I don’t think they should be thrown in jail for it. It’s fricking sick, but if a party isn’t directly harmed, then I don’t see why I have any business telling others what to do.
ETA- to be fair, I guess, from second article, FWIW:
quote:
The parent wants to walk down the aisle in New York City, and is asking a judge to declare the laws unconstitutional and unenforceable in their case, which the lawsuit dubs “PAACNP” for “Parent and Adult Child Non-Procreationable” couples.
This post was edited on 4/17/21 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:32 pm to bird35
quote:
Roll Tide!!
Auburn is not exempt from the joke. Neither is any other state below the Mason Dixon line.
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:32 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
I mean, it’s fricked up as all hell and I condemn it, but yeah if they are two consenting adults over 18, I don’t think they should be thrown in jail for it. It’s fricking sick, but if a party isn’t directly harmed, then I don’t see why I have any business telling others what to do.
You know damn well it won’t stop there
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:33 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
but if a party isn’t directly harmed
There is. Their offspring.
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:33 pm to hottub
quote:exactly, because the offspring had to have been molested from early childhood to think it was okay that daddy marries her.
I think the offspring has a case of being directly harmed.
and yes, having sex with your child at any age is revoltingly horrid and the pedo should damn well go to prison.
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:33 pm to loogaroo
quote:
The fall of Rome.
shite, Rome was doing this long before their fall. Just ask Clodius and Clodia, two famous siblings who were banging each other and caused quite a scandal in the Roman equivalent of the tabloids.
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:37 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
You know damn well it won’t stop there
Probably not, but I’ll put it this way on how much of a freedom absolutist I am: if some guy wishes to be killed and cannibalized by another person who will oblige him, so long as they have a signed contract before a judge saying both parties are consenting this, then I think they should be allowed to do it. Consent is all I really care about. Again the kid thing brings up a third party on the incest, so I’m on the fence on that.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News