Started By
Message

re: For those that still think Obama's net neutrality is good

Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:05 am to
Posted by Jack Bauers HnK
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
6042 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:05 am to
Has that ever been a reality or is that just a boogie man to get worked up over?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:08 am to
quote:

how do you think your local ISP got their network built?


1. Propose fiber routes.
2. Hire survey company.
3. Conduct survey and engineering.
4. Acquire ROW, easements and permits.
5. Bid out project.
6. Execute project.
7. Start up.
8. Hook up new costumers.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
27499 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:09 am to
quote:

Here is a great site to follow that exposes the cronyism of net neutrality: FreeOurInternet.org


Run by the very stooges who want to force you to pay extra to leave their packaged "internet." Right wing people are so easily led to do things which are bad for themselves and the rest of us. Just say that the good and right choice is "liberal" or
"Obama's" and then the right wing outrage will advocate for cutting their own arms off.

I see it in this thread. "Obama's net neutrality." Net neutrality isn't Obama's, you idiot. It is your freedom.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465858 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:09 am to
quote:

Why?

there is an argument that those sorts of plans could lead to lower prices and customizeable internet packages

more poor people could afford basic internet access

also you can get deals like tmobile streaming music service
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:09 am to
quote:

Has that ever been a reality


We have always had net neutrality, so thankfully it has never been a reality re: internet services.

But it will be a reality shortly if what this fool advocates for happens.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Why?


You are assuming that the number of ISPs will remain the same. That won't happen.

Competition will kill that in one second.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465858 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:10 am to
quote:

How are ISP's government created monopolies?

that cable wasn't laid by the companies asking each property owner's permission
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465858 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Net neutrality isn't Obama's, you idiot. It is your freedom.

calls people right wingers and accuses them of mislabeling things

then calls increased government regulation freedom
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
27499 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:12 am to
quote:

customizeable internet packages


There is the issue right there. Internet access is access to the internet. To whatever you can find, whatever you want to do. I don't want Cox to tell me what internet channels they offer. The mere existence of channels means the isp has absolute control over what you see and read. frick that.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85378 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:13 am to
the main argument against NN is that it does protect the current ISPs and it will slow innovation

and I get those arguments, but how far away are we from having real wire free ISPs? that technology seems like it is decades away and I'm not sure I want to suffer through Comcast killing my internet in the meantime
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465858 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:13 am to
quote:

We have always had net neutrality,


LINK

quote:

The Federal Communications Commission on Tuesday approved "high-level rules of the road" designed to ensure that internet providers grant everyone equal access to the Web.


quote:

December 22, 2010
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85378 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:14 am to
quote:

You are assuming that the number of ISPs will remain the same. That won't happen.

Competition will kill that in one second.


why are there not more ISPs right now?
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:16 am to
quote:

You are assuming that the number of ISPs will remain the same. That won't happen.

Competition will kill that in one second.


There's a term you need to learn, before you're ready to really understand this.

That term is "geographic monopoly"

Let us know when you've learned it and are ready to discuss from a more informed position.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:17 am to
quote:

there is an argument that those sorts of plans could lead to lower prices and customizeable internet packages


The first point is a lie, the second is not a positive.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465858 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:17 am to
yeah we're only faced with the best of bad options

NN will essentially establish the current ISPs and there will likely never be a challenger or competition for them. we're setting our internet access industry in stone for at least a decade (possibly more)

no NN could lead to some very fricked up "package" scenarios
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465858 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:18 am to
quote:

The first point is a lie,

i didn't know you could see into the future

quote:

the second is not a positive.

if more budget options are available to poor people and more poor people get internet access, that's a bad thing?

man you've pulled a 180 on your robin hood mentality
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:19 am to
quote:

that cable wasn't laid by the companies asking each property owner's permission




So the condemnation process...for the greater good.

IMO internet is a different issue than other utilities. Internet infrastructure is MUCH easier to install than gas, water,sewer, and/or electric utilities. Even with those utilities you pay for what you use. Given the fact that fiber is much easier to install competition is thus greater. New players will always be ready to step in when old players get fat, expensive and lazy (especially in high destiny areas).
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85378 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:20 am to
quote:

New players will always be ready to step in when old players get fat, expensive and lazy (especially in high destiny areas).


why haven't they?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:22 am to
quote:

why are there not more ISPs right now?


Prices are too low and service is good enough.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:23 am to
quote:

SlowFlowPro


It was discussed as early as the 90s, but was enforced on an informal level until more strict regulations were required.

Not a hard concept.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram