- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: For The Pro-War Crowd? How Much Is Enough?
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:09 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:09 pm to Toomer Deplorable
This post was edited on 3/21/26 at 8:10 pm
1
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:22 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Feigned indifference doesn’t change the historical reality that U.S. orchestrated regime change efforts in the Middle East are often followed by disastrous and unforeseen consequences.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:25 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Not indifferent. Bored with your nonsense.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:35 pm to AndrewAnglin
quote:
The West has too much DEBT so impossible to fight stagflation.
And printing ever more money to finance yet another Middle Eastern war is the solution?
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:39 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Not indifferent. Bored with your nonsense.
After you have responded multiple times in this very thread?
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:50 pm to Toomer Deplorable
The better question was how many U.S. soldiers were going to have to die before someone finally did something about it? Its over 1k so far. How many unarmed civilians? That number is over 200k.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 9:22 pm to davyjones
quote:
Now let’s try it a different way. Can you explain your methodology for arriving at that conclusion regarding such a large number of people, and the claim that you are intimately familiar with the details of the nature of any specific mandate(s) that they personally had in each of their minds when they made the decision to vote for Trump?
Or shall I presume that you’re talking out of your arse, and strangely doing so by boiling a rather complex situation/process down to notably simplistic terms that are proposed to be representative of “a sizable portion of over 75 million Americans”…..
Since you blew off the easier route with the first thing…..
You first. Do you still contend that your rambling word salad(s) on Trump’s promise/doublespeak on avoiding new wars doesn’t count as defending him?
Posted on 3/21/26 at 9:24 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Nobody is for a war
Posted on 3/21/26 at 9:39 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
The better question was how many U.S. soldiers were going to have to die before someone finally did something about it?
Israel, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and the other Gulf Kingdoms are opposed to a nuclear-armed Iran.
Most of these nations have vastly larger economies than Iran and certainly have the financial resources to militarily address this challenge themselves.
So once again, this sidesteps an even larger question: why is it expected the United States should expend blood and treasure to solve this problem?
This post was edited on 3/21/26 at 10:25 pm
Posted on 3/21/26 at 9:39 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
And printing ever more money to finance yet another Middle Eastern war is the solution?
That’s my point. It’s not an available solution. Unless you want Weimar.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 9:41 pm to FLTech
quote:
Nobody is for a war.
Uhhhhh,…..no. The groups undoubtedly promoting this war are:
Israel
US Politicians bought and sold by Israel and the military industrial complex (Lindsey Graham, come on down!)
Military contractors that are salivating at the thought of $200 billion more of our tax dollars that Hegseth and Trump are shilling for….
Get real.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 9:41 pm to FLTech
Posted on 3/21/26 at 9:44 pm to AndrewAnglin
quote:
It’s not an available solution.
Our debt-financed monetary system is the funding mechanism for the Welfare/Warfare State.
This post was edited on 3/21/26 at 9:45 pm
Posted on 3/21/26 at 9:47 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Does it really matter what I contend? You’re gonna think what you want anyway. Plus, don’t you think I would probably be better suited to state what my own intent in doing or saying something is, whether it’s this or whether it’s that, etc etc? It’s pretty pathetic that I would even seriously be forced to have to explain that to another adult. And yet even despite all of that, you will still attempt to argue that that’s not how it works after all, and that your answer is more correct than mine as to my own intent.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 10:00 pm to Toomer Deplorable
What part of even when the U.S. was not attacking Iran they were attacking and killing U.S. soldiers did you miss? Hell Biden gave them billions of dollars, dropped sanctions on them and they were still hitting U.S. soldiers.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 10:02 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Not enough common sense to realize that this is not the warmongering initiatives taken before. Was verified today that Iran has long range (as in all Europe) missile striking capability. Again, it would seem that common sense has escaped you or has been eliminates or severely diluted to your flaming TDS.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 10:09 pm to Toomer Deplorable
As far as that goes when Obama was in office and giving Iran pallets of cash and entering into that stupid nuke deal with them they were killing U.S. soldiers. Meanwhile that dumbass was arming isis and alqaeda with U.S. weapons that eventually got used against our own soldiers and I don't think enough has been said about that.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 10:23 pm to davyjones
quote:
Does it really matter what I contend? You’re gonna think what you want anyway. Plus, don’t you think I would probably be better suited to state what my own intent in doing or saying something is, whether it’s this or whether it’s that, etc etc? It’s pretty pathetic that I would even seriously be forced to have to explain that to another adult. And yet even despite all of that, you will still attempt to argue that that’s not how it works after all, and that your answer is more correct than mine as to my own intent.
You try to frame the discussion as “explaining intent” while ignoring the facts staring us in the face. Trump repeatedly promised during the 2024 campaign to avoid new wars and regime-change operations.
Dismissing those who rightly call out this duplicity as deceitful people who “will say anything to oppose Trump” is a surreal exercise in unintended irony. It’s pretty pathetic that I would even seriously be forced to have to explain that to another adult.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 10:42 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
As far as that goes when Obama was in office and giving Iran pallets of cash and entering into that stupid nuke deal with them they were killing U.S. soldiers. Meanwhile that dumbass was arming isis and alqaeda with U.S. weapons that eventually got used against our own soldiers and I don't think enough has been said about that.
F#ck Obama. He was a progressive Deep State tool. The real question is whether we let team colors decide our principles — or if we hold consistent standards regardless of what party is in power.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 10:44 pm to Toomer Deplorable
We found the tds powerbottom bitch
Page 7 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News