- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/8/17 at 4:12 am to bonhoeffer45
quote:
Tyrusrex
quote:
bonhoeffer45
There is no evidence that CO2 levels effect climate; either long term, as seen in the graph below; intermediate term, as in throughout the Holocene; or short term, like over the last 150 years. The so called greenhouse effect (which by the way is a poor choice of name since a greenhouse is a closed system and the atmosphere is not) is dominated by water vapor. There is theory and evidence that any possible effects of added CO2 is negated by negative H2O feedbacks for example: clouds in the lower atmosphere. If CO2 has any effect at all then it acts as a radiative thermal insulator. As such, added CO2 will cause increases in temperature in the lower troposphere but decreases in temperature in the upper troposphere where SWIR is radiated out to space. If temperatures drop so does H2O content which negates the effect of added CO2. This alone constitutes a substantial theoretical and evidential basis against the idea of AGW. As you both claim, solar forces alone does not account for the warming that we have been observing over the past 100 years but if one would just turn up the solar activity climate warming gain by assuming a relationship between solar activity and albedo then CO2 based warming is not required to account for what we have been observing.
Posted on 9/8/17 at 4:22 am to bonhoeffer45
quote:
But contextualize those scientific phenomena into the broader issue of climate change and you trigger the frick out of a part of the population.
There is a simple reason why...
The main proposed political solutions are carbon credits and global cap and trade.
That does nothing for reducing carbon emissions. It is nothing more than a scheme to do global redistribution of wealth.
Posted on 9/8/17 at 4:44 am to CajunZ81
quote:but.........now there is also......
For all the Climate Change propagandists
I keep hearing that these storms are "unprecedented" and we have never seen anything like it before.
............. an earthquake in Mexico.
The Earth is cooking so much, it is literally cracking
Posted on 9/8/17 at 5:32 am to CajunZ81
Honestly, you don't go from over 10 years without a direct major landfall in the Gulf region to this and call it warming. It's a peek in the normal peeks/valleys game. That's it.
Warming would look more like seriously rising water elevations around the world. Levels never before seen and be shown to be more gradual. But, that's my laymans perspective.
Warming would look more like seriously rising water elevations around the world. Levels never before seen and be shown to be more gradual. But, that's my laymans perspective.
Posted on 9/8/17 at 6:10 am to el Gaucho
quote:
how do liberals still believe in this climate bs? they really want us to believe that theres a bubble that holds all the air in around the earth?
They're bubbleheads
MAGA
Posted on 9/8/17 at 6:45 am to Tyrusrex
quote:
Did we complain about power plants restrictions when we were cutting down sulfer restrictions to reduce acid rain?
Lulz
This never really happened in any significant way because of loopholes in the CAA,though.
Posted on 9/8/17 at 7:05 am to Tyrusrex
quote:
This shouldn't be a question about freedom, conservative or liberal. It should be a question of is if climate change is real, and if it's real what are we willing to do about it. Did we complain about power plants restrictions when we were cutting down sulfer restrictions to reduce acid rain? Did we complain about when Reagan reduced aeresols in 1986 to protect the ozone? Science shouldn't be a left right issue.
Is this a response to my post or just random platitudes?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News