- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/21/20 at 9:08 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
him...possibly from a govt database of all communications
Like a "hammer"?
Posted on 5/21/20 at 9:22 pm to GeronimoBernstein
quote:
Otherwise, the Court is either a witness or a party, and then where does one turn for an impartial tribunal?
Contempt... that is the only issue that Powell's brief is light on. It is within the court's inherent authority, subject to abuse.
In Powell's brief, it is mentioned passively in the context of bias, where I think it should be, but... wondering if this is strategic baiting or a soft underbelly. Tend to think the former rather than the latter.
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:13 pm to PhDoogan
Mentioned earlier regarding an "appeal" I do not believe a judge has the authority to appeal anything done by a superior court. The appeal would have to be taken by the litigants. Since neither will appeal an order of dismissal...case goes away. Judge does not have standing to appeal.
Posted on 5/22/20 at 6:20 am to SSpaniel
quote:
Has Hank weighed in yet to tell us how this is wrong, overreach, possibly unconstitutional and bad jurisprudence?
Nah, he's still in hiding after being outed as a rapist supporting, creepy little perv last week.
He's probably been scouring his post History, heavily editing some of the creepy things he admitted to doing while in college.
Don't worry tho', like most Sociopaths, he'll be back and pretend nothing happened, blaming it on the boards' ignorance.
Posted on 5/22/20 at 8:54 am to PhDoogan
who thinks that Sullivan will delay until the last day possible?
Posted on 5/22/20 at 8:55 am to cajunangelle
Most certainly. And it wouldn't surprise me if his response was actually drafted by Gleeson and his firm.
Posted on 5/22/20 at 1:08 pm to PhDoogan
Why hasn’t anyone filed ethics complaints against Sullivan yet? The dude has literally violated every judicial ethical rule starting with accusing Flynn of treason out of nowhere in open court to refusing to dismiss this case in violation of controlling DC Circuit and SCOTUS precedent and soliciting amicus briefs to oppose the motion. If a Republican or conservative judge anywhere in America (like Roy Moore with the stuff he pulled in Bama) pulled this crap, they would get investigated, thrown off the bench, and ostracized for the rest of time. Total double standard.
Posted on 5/22/20 at 1:12 pm to ThePTExperience1969
Why hasn’t anyone filed ethics complaints against Sullivan yet?
Why hasn’t anyone filed ethics complaints against Van Grack yet?
Why hasn’t anyone filed ethics complaints against the watergate lawyers yet?
Why hasn’t anyone filed ethics complaints against Weissmann yet?
Why hasn’t anyone filed ethics complaints against all of honest Bob's SC lawyers yet?
Why hasn’t anyone filed ethics complaints against Jackson the hack Judge on Stone's case yet?
Why hasn’t anyone filed ethics complaints against DWS's brother regarding the Seth Rich Case yet?
Why hasn’t anyone filed ethics complaints against Van Grack yet?
Why hasn’t anyone filed ethics complaints against the watergate lawyers yet?
Why hasn’t anyone filed ethics complaints against Weissmann yet?
Why hasn’t anyone filed ethics complaints against all of honest Bob's SC lawyers yet?
Why hasn’t anyone filed ethics complaints against Jackson the hack Judge on Stone's case yet?
Why hasn’t anyone filed ethics complaints against DWS's brother regarding the Seth Rich Case yet?
Posted on 5/22/20 at 5:48 pm to ThePTExperience1969
Posted on 5/22/20 at 6:14 pm to rumproast
The conviction would not be final until after the appellate delays have run should no appeal be pursued following sentencing. Because the motion to dismiss was filed prior to sentencing and prior to the expiration of those delays, I think it obviates the plea.
As an analogy, even if someone were convicted by a 12 person jury, that conviction is overturned by application of law should that defendant die before he/she can finish the appellate process.
As an analogy, even if someone were convicted by a 12 person jury, that conviction is overturned by application of law should that defendant die before he/she can finish the appellate process.
Posted on 5/22/20 at 6:17 pm to Eternally Undefeated
Sounds familiar.
Wasn’t Aaron Hernandez’ murder conviction overturned for the same reason?
He had been serving time for it when he committed suicide but it was working its way through the appellate courts at that moment.
Wasn’t Aaron Hernandez’ murder conviction overturned for the same reason?
He had been serving time for it when he committed suicide but it was working its way through the appellate courts at that moment.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News