- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Federal judges can be impeached/removed for "abuse of power"
Posted on 2/5/17 at 12:52 pm to cwill
Posted on 2/5/17 at 12:52 pm to cwill
quote:
Strannix why don't you give us your review of why the decision is definitively "wrong".
I did in another thread. The reasoning the judge used would apply to any restriction of immigration. As such, it doesn't make sense as it would limit the President's ability to restrict immigration no matter what restriction they made.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 12:54 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
The judge isn't the Ninth. The judge's decision is reviewed by the Ninth which is then reviewed by the SCOTUS
If his decision is reviewed by the ninth, his court is in the ninth circuit.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 1:20 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
guess it's whatever the House wants to accuse them of. Looks like some of the OG judges were too damn drunk to perform their duties. Some of them probably hit on the first lady. I guess those could still apply today. Maybe this Robart guy is a warlock. I'm sure Donald's people are on it.
So no real answer as to what would qualify as misconduct in YOUR mind?
I wonder why that is
Posted on 2/5/17 at 1:28 pm to Navytiger74
quote:If you have difficulty making sense of what I post it likely has more to do with your alcohol addiction than my age.
It's a variable that allows me to make sense of you.
quote:I'm not sensitive at all which explains why I ignored you mentioning my age many times before I asked you about it. As a two-time, 10 year colon cancer survivor I'm extremely thankful to be getting older every day....
Don't be sensitive.
quote:Nah, I have official marriage and birth certificates to prove my birth and parents.
I know what they told me. Just as you do.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 1:31 pm to Dignan
quote:The difference is I didn't start a thread on the Help Board asking Chicken to give me a new screen name because I'm embarrassed by it like VCULSUTigerRamsetcetc did.
Your screen name still sucks....
Says the Russian.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 1:33 pm to novabill
The danger here is rule by black robe. Don't like the wall? Shop a judge and get him to stop it. Open our borders wide by filing suits in Federal Court.
Cut off money to sanctuary cities? No you don't Donald! We don't have a pen and phone but we DO have a judge and the 9th Circuit!
OK Congress..pass that tax cut for the rich? Noooooo you don't! Suit time! Those cuts are morally wrong!
Nuclear option to nominate Gorsuch?? OH NO YOU DIDN'T! And you won't once the judge steps in.
If you can't see this coming you are blind. Rule by a black robed dictatorship with NO checks and NO balances. The Left rules the country.
Cut off money to sanctuary cities? No you don't Donald! We don't have a pen and phone but we DO have a judge and the 9th Circuit!
OK Congress..pass that tax cut for the rich? Noooooo you don't! Suit time! Those cuts are morally wrong!
Nuclear option to nominate Gorsuch?? OH NO YOU DIDN'T! And you won't once the judge steps in.
If you can't see this coming you are blind. Rule by a black robed dictatorship with NO checks and NO balances. The Left rules the country.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 1:35 pm to LSURussian
quote:Heh.
If you have difficulty making sense of what I post it likely has more to do with your alcohol addiction than my age.
quote:Well good for you, sincerely. Beating Cancer's arse is a great thing. In spite of your claims of some time ago, I never really wished death on you or anyone else.
I'm not sensitive at all which explains why I ignored you mentioning my age many times before I asked you about it. As a two-time, 10 year colon cancer survivor I'm extremely thankful to be getting older every day....
quote:Doesn't everyone? Pretty sure that was standard even in backward Louisiana by the time I was born in 1983.
Nah, I have official marriage and birth certificates to prove my birth and parents.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 1:43 pm to antibarner
Maybe that is why all i hear is crickets in response to my question
Posted on 2/5/17 at 1:44 pm to Navytiger74
quote:So you didn't say "Good. I hope he's dead." when someone mentioned I had not posted for a couple of months on this board?
I never really wished death on you
Posted on 2/5/17 at 1:46 pm to LSURussian
quote:Of course. Pretty sure I noted it as a joke then and now. I've written similar things about friends.
So you didn't say "Good. I hope he's dead." when someone mentioned I had not posted for a couple of months on this board?
Posted on 2/5/17 at 1:47 pm to Navytiger74
quote:Nah.
Pretty sure I noted it as a joke
Posted on 2/5/17 at 1:49 pm to LSURussian
quote:Well let's see it. I can't find it, but it sounds like something I might have said in jest.
Nah.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 1:55 pm to Dignan
quote:
Well, you have a better chance of winning the lottery than a being killed in a terrorist attack: roughly 1 in 3.6 billion.
Well, there's a fake statistic.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 1:59 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Well let's see it.
You wrote "Good. I hope he's dead."
Then about 20 minutes later you edited the post to add, "ETA: Whoever downvoted this is easily offended.
Or they don't know Russian."
After another poster called you out for posting the first part, you replied to her with "I was just kidding...mostly."
You're all class.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 2:01 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
I haven't read either brief, I will say that a "likelihood of success on the merits" is not the same as "likely to succeed on the merits." The test is closer to "plaintiffs have asserted a claim which would survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim."
Exactly. This wasn't a ruling on whether or not the EO was within the president's power. But people are arguing as if it was.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 2:02 pm to the808bass
Posted on 2/5/17 at 2:03 pm to LSURussian
quote:It was a joke, Russian. That's obvious. Sorry you took it literally. Another poster thought I wanted him to commit suicide because I posted a picture of a girl with a gun in her mouth. Got a nice ban for that.
Then about 20 minutes later you edited the post to add, "ETA: Whoever downvoted this is easily offended.
Or they don't know Russian."
After another poster called you out for posting the first part, you replied to her with "I was just kidding...mostly."
You're all class.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 2:04 pm to Dignan
You're bad at talking and reading. That didn't say "terrorist attack." It said "terrorist attack on an American on American soil by a refugee." Add a few more disclaimers and you'll increase the odds to 10B.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 2:06 pm to Dignan
quote:You just proved the other poster correct when he called you out for your incorrect stat.
Well, there's a fake statistic.
I know, I know...Stats and Figures can't tell you nuthin'
Even worse, you still don't realize it.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 2:07 pm to novabill
You keep harping on this. In my mind, I would say something like the examples I gave. Definitely not a simple TRO. How about you?
Popular
Back to top



1






