- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/3/23 at 3:25 pm to Larry_Hotdogs
quote:
Who?
There have been dozens (hundreds?) of papers investigating the efficacy of ivermectin as a treatment or prophylaxis for Covid-19.
None have shown any benefit.
I know it's hard for some of you to understand how science in medicine works, but in this (and many things) you are objectively wrong.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 3:34 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
There have been dozens (hundreds?) of papers investigating the efficacy of ivermectin as a treatment or prophylaxis for Covid-19.
None have shown any benefit.
Wrong.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 3:55 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
As he should. It warrants a lulz.
But instead it got a nobel prize.
This post was edited on 9/3/23 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 9/3/23 at 3:57 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
I know it's hard for some of you to understand how science in medicine works, but in this (and many things) you are objectively wrong.
Remember when you claimed that you worked at the CDC?
Posted on 9/3/23 at 3:58 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Remember when you claimed that you worked at the CDC?
No way! Did she really??
Posted on 9/3/23 at 3:58 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
Not sure why some of y'all don't believe they were tested. Each of my trials went on abt a year before even one segment of the population was eligible to receive.
So, 3 trials concurrently? What time period(s)?
For what vaccine?
Posted on 9/3/23 at 3:59 pm to 2020_reVISION
quote:
So, 3 trials concurrently?
Yeah. That seems strange.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 4:17 pm to 2020_reVISION
quote:
So, 3 trials concurrently? What time period(s)?
For what vaccine?
AstraZeneca, but it was pulled half way through. Then Pfizer. Then Bovarian Nordic A/S.
And absolutely not concurrently.
This post was edited on 9/3/23 at 4:19 pm
Posted on 9/3/23 at 4:22 pm to SlimTigerSlap
You see a lot of threads on this board asking why the country is going down the drain and there are always big institution type answers but the truth is it’s because of people like you and BamaAtl. Without millions of morons like you none of these people would get away with it.
This post was edited on 9/3/23 at 4:24 pm
Posted on 9/3/23 at 4:28 pm to SlimTigerSlap
The AstraZeneca is in my work email archives and I'm not near my laptop to VPN in.
I started the Pfizer long before the date on the image. This was revised paperwork I had to resign.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 4:29 pm to Madking
quote:
You see a lot of threads on this board asking why the country is going down the drain and there are always big institution type answers but the truth is it’s because of people like you and BamaAtl. Without millions of morons like you none of these people would get away with it.
Sorry I'm not a commie. I reserve the right to put whatever I want in my body. I champion your right to reject it.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 4:38 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
I was in 3 early trials for 3 different COVID vaccines. Had boosters for each.
I never heard about mental retardation being a side effect of the vaccines?
Posted on 9/3/23 at 4:38 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
I know it's hard for some of you to understand how science in medicine works, but in this (and many things) you are objectively wrong.
Scientists in other countries disagree. Every country outside of the US and its vassal states were giving Ivermectin as a treatment for Covid.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 4:45 pm to Perfect Circle
quote:
Scientists in other countries disagree. Every country outside of the US and its vassal states were giving Ivermectin as a treatment for Covid.
I think you actually believe what you posted.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 4:46 pm to Perfect Circle
If nothing else, it’s a harmless medication that could potentially eliminate a secondary illness and reduce comorbidity risk. The idea that it was appropriate for the FDA to shame people over a safe drug that many countries were using during a time of uncertainty and medical experimentation around treatment is strange to me. Why would anyone condone that behavior by a public health agency? And it completely blew up in their faces.
They had resources to try and crush Ivermectin, but they did NOTHING to promote weight loss and proper diet, which could have saved thousands of lives.
They had resources to try and crush Ivermectin, but they did NOTHING to promote weight loss and proper diet, which could have saved thousands of lives.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 4:47 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
And it completely blew up in their faces.
It didn't.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 4:50 pm to SlimTigerSlap
Agree to disagree. They got sued and lost.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 4:55 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Agree to disagree. They got sued and lost.
But that's just not true. 5th Circuit reversed a lower court's ruling by stating that a lawsuit against the FDA's messaging can continue. It has been sent back to the lower courts. No one has won/lose anything.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 4:58 pm to SlimTigerSlap
Oh ok. I’ve changed my mind, then. It’s perfectly appropriate and part of the serious responsibility of public health administration in a time of crisis for the FDA to make fun of a frightened American public by comparing them to livestock.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News