- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FDA rejects boosters
Posted on 9/17/21 at 4:52 pm to AubieinNC2009
Posted on 9/17/21 at 4:52 pm to AubieinNC2009
CNN's headline on this: FDA vaccine advisers vote to recommend booster doses of Covid-19 vaccine in people 65 and older and those at high risk
https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/17/health/fda-vrbpac-booster-meeting/index.html
https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/17/health/fda-vrbpac-booster-meeting/index.html
0
Posted on 9/17/21 at 4:54 pm to ZOMGlsutigers
If you want acetonitrile in your body which metabolizes into hydrogen cyanide
Posted on 9/17/21 at 5:04 pm to AubieinNC2009
Wheels starting to come off, boys. Folks are waking from a very long slumber.
Posted on 9/17/21 at 5:08 pm to AubieinNC2009
quote:Fauci was hawking for third jabs approved all the way down to 16y/o's. He is a fricking idiot!
FDA went against Biden
Posted on 9/17/21 at 5:09 pm to AubieinNC2009
Why no boosters? I thought the jab was totes safe?
Posted on 9/17/21 at 6:33 pm to AubieinNC2009
quote:
A U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel on Friday endorsed emergency approval for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine booster shot at least six months following the second dose among people ages 65 and older and those at high risk of occupational exposure and severe COVID-19.
Did they change the article?
Posted on 9/17/21 at 6:48 pm to xGeauxLSUx
Yes. They changed the wording to make it look more favorable to the admin.
Rejected broad application of the booster.
Only for the elderly and most at-risk.
Rejected broad application of the booster.
Only for the elderly and most at-risk.
Posted on 9/17/21 at 7:28 pm to AubieinNC2009
16 of the voters did not find enough cash in their mailbox, so up the incentives or the booster gets canned.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News