Started By
Message

re: FBI whistleblower testified under oath that the FBI would not allow11,000 hours of J6 vide

Posted on 5/30/26 at 4:44 pm to
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49576 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

merely being there that fateful bloody day.

that doesn't make sense = If you happen to be in a group who is petitioning the government for redress of grievances and a few paid agitators (who have opposite interests) start a bunch of 'incidents' you bear no responsibility for the progression of that activity, which you did not participate in, didn't approve of, and was causing the very thing you were there to support being cancelled because of the 'emergency'.

Especially when the 'emergency' was declared by the very same entity who had (most likely) been the motivator for all the malcontents who created that 'bloody day'

And the only 'blood' shed was the work of one of the 'guards' - who betrayed every concept concerning use of deadly force - and then got a medal for the murder he committed.

That entire incident was a masterfully designed psy-op.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
97275 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

(3) Brian Sicknick was walking around fine that afternoon. I wondered why the guys who sprayed/attacked him weren't charged with murder. That explains why.


Can you link that video? I’d like to send it to someone who thinks J6 was a nuclear holocaust
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
97275 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

A lot of things if you were one of the ones who did damage which is documented on video. How does FBI agents "being there" excuse that?


First it was “them showing up” in a general sense. Then you changed it to “if you were one of the ones who did damage”

Which is it? Are you against freedom of speech?
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
91158 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 5:15 pm to
Correct I was ridiculing that comment by the clown.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167967 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 5:58 am to
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115656 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 6:50 am to
Seems at odds with Mr. Wray's testimony before Congress.
Posted by G2160
houston
Member since May 2013
2387 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 7:18 am to
quote:

How does FBI having agents there impact the idiots who are on video doing damage and stealing stuff and fighting with police officers? Make it make sense.


It doesn’t impact people doing stupid things, but you don’t want to have an honest conversation about J6.

“Agents” (or undercovers embedded in the crowd) were stoking tensions.

13 entered restricted areas and were not arrested. 4 entered the Capitol and were not arrested. None were authorized to enter restricted areas.

This is only what the FBI has admitted to, which was after the FBI director said under oath that he was not aware of any under covers at j6.

Why would the FBI director lie about this, and why would we believe what they told us they know?
This post was edited on 5/31/26 at 7:20 am
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167967 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 8:02 am to
And yet like Rosenstein and McCabe... he enjoys a probable posh law firm with Sally Yates and the rest...

If Wray gets hauled in so does Barr. It wont happen because the Rs and Ds are one team...
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram