- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fani wins
Posted on 3/16/24 at 11:04 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 3/16/24 at 11:04 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Dumb mischaracterization
There has been legitimate rage and a ton of melting down over this decision. That's emotional-irrational behavior.
I believe that poster has even used the term "angry" to describe that population. He himself admits that status.
1
Posted on 3/16/24 at 11:10 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Dumb mischaracterization
He thinks everyone who disagrees with him is being “emotional”. That’s his equivalent of accusing people who disagree with you of being “racist”.
Posted on 3/16/24 at 11:13 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
He thinks everyone who disagrees with him is being “emotional”.
No.
I call people who are being emotional, emotional.
Primarily because it's a line MAGA-Patriots love to throw out, ironically sometimes while melting the frick down
It's why I always like to point out the big government/Leftist economics of MAGA when I can, b/c they love to lie about that, too.
quote:
That’s his equivalent of accusing people who disagree with you of being “racist”.
Wrong. Plenty of people disagree with me and I don't call them emotional.
Just look at the post I responded to:
quote:
You see why people are pissed. So maybe just STFU and let them be pissed.
Admitting emotional thinking of others
quote:
No one wants to hear your gaslighting bullshite.
Displaying emotional thinking, individually
Posted on 3/16/24 at 11:20 am to SlowFlowPro
If you are really a lawyer I see why this country is going down the shitter.
Posted on 3/16/24 at 11:21 am to LSUBALLER
quote:
If you are really a lawyer I see why this country is going down the shitter.
Why?
Posted on 3/16/24 at 11:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Other than Wade was getting bigtime state payola for the case c/o his Fani f**kbuddy.
McAfee had no real legal basis to dismiss the prosecution
Posted on 3/16/24 at 11:32 am to davyjones
quote:... and there it is.
DA there just willy nilly decided to file a BOI to that effect because he felt like it.
Posted on 3/16/24 at 11:35 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No
Yes, it’s your go to accusation when your arguments fail to persuade someone or when another poster rebuts your arguments.
Posted on 3/16/24 at 11:39 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Other than Wade was getting bigtime state payola for the case c/o his Fani f**kbuddy.
Go read the opinion. I'm pretty sure GA law won't permit dismissal if there is a less restrictive solution (which they clearly was, even if the whole DA's office had to recuse).
Posted on 3/16/24 at 11:40 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Yes, it’s your go to accusation when your arguments fail to persuade someone or when another poster rebuts your arguments.
I literally quoted him referencing emotional people and then his own emotive display.
Why did you ignore that?
Posted on 3/16/24 at 11:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
Clearly "indictment, trial, judgment, and punishment" of a sitting President is possible, per the Constitution, and this is a separate process from the Congressional impeachment-removal process.
thats not how that reads to me.
seems like the party convicted by the senate following impeachment is liable for indictment trial judgement and punishment. This does not all suggest you can charge a sitting president imo, no clue where you imagine this into the wording.
Posted on 3/16/24 at 11:49 am to AMS
quote:
seems like the party convicted by the senate following impeachment is liable for indictment trial judgement and punishment.
It's clarifying that the Senate "conviction" would not preclude criminal prosecution.
From the DOJ memo referenced earlier:
quote:
The OLC memorandum explained, however, that the use of the term ‘ ‘neverthe less” cast doubt on the argument that the Impeachment Judgment Clause con stitutes a bar to the prosecution of a person subject to impeachment prior to the termination of impeachment proceedings. Id. at 3. “Nevertheless” indicates that the Framers intended the Clause to signify only that prior conviction in the Senate would not constitute a bar to subsequent prosecution, not that prosecution of a person subject to impeachment could occur only after conviction in the Senate. Id. “The purpose of this clause thus is to permit criminal prosecution in spite of the prior adjudication by the Senate, i.e., to forestall a double jeopardy argu ment.”
Posted on 3/16/24 at 12:04 pm to Blutarsky
quote:
Group picture of typical elected Democrats:
Posted on 3/16/24 at 1:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
What Junior College did you attend!
Posted on 3/16/24 at 1:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:This opinion?
Go read the opinion
Posted on 3/16/24 at 2:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You misconstrue channelled emotion as irrationality. In life, that conflation can prove a very major mistake.
That's emotional-irrational behavior.
E.g.,
Posted on 3/16/24 at 4:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I literally quoted him referencing emotional people and then his own emotive display. Why did you ignore that?
You quoted ONE person to try and paint with a broader brush. That’s your shtick. “Oh, you disagree with me? Look how emotional you are”. People rebut your arguments here all the time and when that happens your go to response is to accuse the board of being “emotional”. You’re no different than the leftists who constantly fling the racism accusation when their arguments fail.
Posted on 3/17/24 at 5:02 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:You also call people who are not being emotional, emotional. You then extrapolate the mischaracterization to one of irrationality. Of course anything irrational is assumed dismissable.
I call people who are being emotional, emotional.
Even if your irrationality predicate was valid, it's badly undercut by projection ...
e.g.,
"it's a line MAGA-Patriots love to throw out, ironically sometimes while melting the frick down
" ... not exactly the stuff of emotionless intellectuality, SFP. Frankly though, I suspect it doesn't bother most folks when you post emotionally as you do, tossing in 5 or 6 extraneous "literally"s and several "LOL" emojis in the process. It's just not that big a deal.
Posted on 3/17/24 at 6:47 am to NC_Tigah
That was one non comfirming guilt of law breaking summation by the judge.
Posted on 3/17/24 at 6:55 am to LSUBALLER
quote:
What Junior College did you attend!
I slummed it at LSU but was in the Honors College and graduated summa cum laude without really trying hard
Page 16 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News