- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fake News WaPo: Trump team has plans to slander Flynn
Posted on 12/27/17 at 7:57 pm to victoire sécurisé
Posted on 12/27/17 at 7:57 pm to victoire sécurisé
Fox is far and away the most fair and balanced when it comes to Trump. It really isn’t even close
Posted on 12/27/17 at 7:59 pm to Bunyan
quote:
Oh, and this
Try reading about that snipthat you copied.
It's not biased to report negatively on the president. In the same way that it's not biased if you report that "bag o' glass" is dangerous.
LINK
When someone reports a negative fact about your guy, it's not bias. It's just something you don't want to hear.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:03 pm to victoire sécurisé
quote:
When someone reports a negative fact about your guy, it's not bias. It's just something you don't want to hear.

Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:03 pm to bamarep
quote:
Or quote an actual named person as a source.
You should read about journalistic methods. You can't reveal a source if you expect them to remain a source. Plus, there are other ways to verify an anonymous source.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:05 pm to bamarep
The guy got fired for lying and has already pleaded guilty to crimes.
How can you slander someone by stating simple facts about them?
How can you slander someone by stating simple facts about them?
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:06 pm to Bunyan
Are we going to use anecdotal evidence to try to make a point? That won't get us anywhere.
There are a million fox screenshots I could dig up that provejust as much as yours does.
There are a million fox screenshots I could dig up that provejust as much as yours does.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:08 pm to IAmReality
quote:
The guy got fired for lying and has already pleaded guilty to crimes.
Can we then at least agree that it was foolish to keep him as National Security Advisor for 18 days after he had been outed as a liar and felon?
I also might add that Flynn was only fired after "anonymous sources" turned out to be correct when they reported that Flynn had lied to the FBI.
This post was edited on 12/27/17 at 8:10 pm
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:09 pm to victoire sécurisé
So a good source is "familiar with Trump's mindset?"
Please tell me you don't think that is quality reporting.
Such good reporting going on at WaPo
FAKE NEWS
Please tell me you don't think that is quality reporting.
Such good reporting going on at WaPo
FAKE NEWS
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:13 pm to Bunyan
If you want to use a false claim about crowd size as justification for firing, I'm okay with that.
But if that was the measuring stick, Trump would have lasted less than 24 hrs in office.
But if that was the measuring stick, Trump would have lasted less than 24 hrs in office.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:17 pm to victoire sécurisé
Didn't say it was a measuring stick. I gave you data and examples of major news outlet gossip without sources or evidence.
Major retractions in the past few weeks are all I need to know
Major retractions in the past few weeks are all I need to know
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:24 pm to Bunyan
You provided data of the "tone". Nothing about gossip without sources. You need to understand the difference to hold a meaningful discourse.
You provided one example of an obscure journalist's tweet, which was retracted and issued a public apology for the mistake.
That's hardly evidence of a huge media conspiracy as your Dear Leader would have you believe.
In reality, Trump is manipulating you to immediately deny the validity of ALL journalism, both credible and fake. Questioning media sources is healthy, but he has got you immediately denying every report out of WaPo. He has you right where he wants you.
You provided one example of an obscure journalist's tweet, which was retracted and issued a public apology for the mistake.
That's hardly evidence of a huge media conspiracy as your Dear Leader would have you believe.
In reality, Trump is manipulating you to immediately deny the validity of ALL journalism, both credible and fake. Questioning media sources is healthy, but he has got you immediately denying every report out of WaPo. He has you right where he wants you.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:25 pm to victoire sécurisé
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/25/20 at 11:10 am
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:27 pm to bamarep
quote:
to cast former national security adviser Michael Flynn as a liar
uh, he pled to lying?
And he was fired for lying?
So why on Earth would that be a slander on him?
Weak sauce
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:28 pm to graychef
They were spot-on when they reported that Trump's National Security Advisor was a blackmail threat because he had lied to the FBI while Russia was listening.
Just one example.
Just one example.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:30 pm to bamarep
I’d say there’s a much better chance for a Pardon than slander.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:33 pm to victoire sécurisé
quote:Sounds like you're the one being manipulated.
In reality, Trump is manipulating you to immediately deny the validity of ALL journalism, both credible and fake. Questioning media sources is healthy, but he has got you immediately denying every report out of WaPo. He has you right where he wants you.
The media has you right where they want you. Ignorant and ill-informed.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:33 pm to victoire sécurisé
quote:
hey were spot-on when they reported that Trump's National Security Advisor was a blackmail threat because he had lied to the FBI while Russia was listening
Pure speculation is spot on news.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:36 pm to bamarep
Pointing out if Flynn lies is not "slander".
At this point does anybody believe that Flynn could make up something about Trump that Mueller KNOWS is a lie and Mueller would run with it anyway?
At this point does anybody believe that Flynn could make up something about Trump that Mueller KNOWS is a lie and Mueller would run with it anyway?
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:36 pm to bhtigerfan
If I read both Foxnews and WaPo amongst others, and you only read FoxNews, which of us is ignorant and I'll-informed?
Here, I'll give you the answer;
LINK
Here, I'll give you the answer;
LINK
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:39 pm to victoire sécurisé
quote:
If I read both Foxnews and WaPo amongst others, and you only read FoxNews, which of us is ignorant and I'll-informed?
Here, I'll give you the answer;
LINK
leftists make up scientific sounding bullshite to smear their political opponents?
Gee that's new
Popular
Back to top


0





