- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Facebook was a Pentagon project
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:58 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:58 pm to Toomer Deplorable
You and burger need to re-read the very specific post I was replying to with my Ron Watkins comment
Posted on 9/21/21 at 10:22 pm to burger bearcat
Most of us have known this for 5 years. It is a good redpill item though.
Posted on 9/21/21 at 11:32 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
econd, I call bullshite on a trademarked logo for a government program.
Yea, I agree. NASA
Posted on 9/21/21 at 11:41 pm to burger bearcat
I don't know about any of that stuff, but I have zero doubt that the three letter agencies are balls deep in any big social type companies. They use them to gather information.
Posted on 9/22/21 at 5:00 am to boosiebadazz
You are a colossal dumbass
Posted on 9/22/21 at 7:20 am to pbro62
lifelog + mockingbird = facebook
Posted on 9/22/21 at 7:36 am to jonnyanony
Who gives a frick if the “timelines are correct.” That shite is meaningless. Do y’all understand what the original Facebook was? It was a digital replacement for a book that just had people’s pics and names in it. That’s it.
This post was edited on 9/22/21 at 7:37 am
Posted on 9/22/21 at 7:44 am to baybeefeetz
That you do not see the push to get ahead of the eventual narrative by producing a Hollywood biopic that lays out the purported origins of Facebook is staggeringly on brand.
There's more historically accurate information in The Empire Strikes Back than in in any frame of The Social Network.
There's more historically accurate information in The Empire Strikes Back than in in any frame of The Social Network.
Posted on 9/22/21 at 7:58 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Ron Watkins just repackaged it and regurgitated it to you a decade later
Of all the ridiculous thing that you guys believed, from
Russia collusion Jussie's lynching, the pee tape, to Bubba's noose, the Ron Watkins is Q might be the most absurd of all.
People like you are how Robin Roberts' gets the title of investigative reporter.
Posted on 9/22/21 at 8:43 am to mhasen1
quote:
the Ron Watkins is Q might be the most absurd of all.
He watched 3H of HBO and stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last night. Cower in the shadow of his intellectual superiority.
Posted on 9/22/21 at 8:47 am to burger bearcat
Whether is was or wasn't from the beginning is kind of a pointless debate since they sure as shite work hand in hand with our intel agencies now.
Posted on 9/22/21 at 11:55 am to burger bearcat
quote:
Facebook was a Pentagon project
Ayy, people finally putting the pieces of the puzzle together. Nice.
Remember when the CIA used Twitter to foment the "Arab Spring".
And, it's been scrubbed from Wikipedia now, but the information that DARPA money is what funded Twitter's expansion and its founders being CIA used to be on there and adequately sourced.
Posted on 9/22/21 at 8:37 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
You and burger need to re-read the very specific SH*+POST I was replying to with my Ron Watkins comment
FIFY!
Posted on 9/22/21 at 9:28 pm to burger bearcat
Q told us 3 years ago
Posted on 9/22/21 at 9:35 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
That you do not see the push to get ahead of the eventual narrative by producing a Hollywood biopic that lays out the purported origins of Facebook is staggeringly on brand.
There's more historically accurate information in The Empire Strikes Back than in in any frame of The Social Network.
Battle of Tinian is a great place to start. Desert
Storm, watch the clouds/smoke. Trump wasn’t kidding when he said invisible enemy
Posted on 9/23/21 at 8:20 pm to burger bearcat
Related: Pay to not pay? This commonly is called a bribe.
Lawsuit Claim: Facebook Overpaid FTC Fine By Billions To Protect Zuckerberg.
Shareholders say the overpayment was an "express quid pro quo”
In a newly unsealed lawsuit, Facebook shareholders allege that the company intentionally overpaid a $5 billion Federal Trade Commission fine to protect CEO Mark Zuckerberg from further government scrutiny.
"Zuckerberg, Sandberg, and other Facebook directors agreed to authorize a multi-billion settlement with the FTC as an express quid pro quo to protect Zuckerberg from being named in the FTC's complaint, made subject to personal liability, or even required to sit for a deposition," the lawsuit says (emphasis in the original). An early draft of the order obtained by The Washington Post through the Freedom of Information Act shows that the commission was considering holding Zuckerberg responsible.
The FTC levied the fine in July 2019 in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, which saw political operatives harvesting the personal data of 50 million Facebook users without their consent. (The lawsuit says only 0.31 percent of the affected users consented.) The fine (which was a record for privacy-related penalties) was 50 times larger than the maximum prescribed by a previous FTC consent decree, the lawsuit alleges. It was also well in excess of the previous record fine of $168 million.
"Facebook's maximum monetary exposure was $104,751,390—about $4.9 billion less than it agreed to pay," shareholders said in the lawsuit. The overpayment, they said, is a breach of fiduciary duty.
Insider trading
The lawsuit also alleges that, by withholding information about the Cambridge Analytica leak, executives and board members, including Zuckerberg and COO Sheryl Sandberg, engaged in insider trading. "After Zuckerberg learned of Cambridge Analytica's massive extraction of Facebook user data, he and the entities controlled by him significantly accelerated his sales of Facebook shares," the lawsuit says….
Lawsuit Claim: Facebook Overpaid FTC Fine By Billions To Protect Zuckerberg.
Shareholders say the overpayment was an "express quid pro quo”
In a newly unsealed lawsuit, Facebook shareholders allege that the company intentionally overpaid a $5 billion Federal Trade Commission fine to protect CEO Mark Zuckerberg from further government scrutiny.
"Zuckerberg, Sandberg, and other Facebook directors agreed to authorize a multi-billion settlement with the FTC as an express quid pro quo to protect Zuckerberg from being named in the FTC's complaint, made subject to personal liability, or even required to sit for a deposition," the lawsuit says (emphasis in the original). An early draft of the order obtained by The Washington Post through the Freedom of Information Act shows that the commission was considering holding Zuckerberg responsible.
The FTC levied the fine in July 2019 in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, which saw political operatives harvesting the personal data of 50 million Facebook users without their consent. (The lawsuit says only 0.31 percent of the affected users consented.) The fine (which was a record for privacy-related penalties) was 50 times larger than the maximum prescribed by a previous FTC consent decree, the lawsuit alleges. It was also well in excess of the previous record fine of $168 million.
"Facebook's maximum monetary exposure was $104,751,390—about $4.9 billion less than it agreed to pay," shareholders said in the lawsuit. The overpayment, they said, is a breach of fiduciary duty.
Insider trading
The lawsuit also alleges that, by withholding information about the Cambridge Analytica leak, executives and board members, including Zuckerberg and COO Sheryl Sandberg, engaged in insider trading. "After Zuckerberg learned of Cambridge Analytica's massive extraction of Facebook user data, he and the entities controlled by him significantly accelerated his sales of Facebook shares," the lawsuit says….
Popular
Back to top


1








