- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Executive Privilege
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:23 pm
Many leftist are saying once you waive Executive Privilege, you can't invoke it after the fact. What's the truth here?
11
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:24 pm to Walkthedawg
They are nuts.
I remember that IRS bitch answering some questions and then taking the 5th later
Mueller was working WITHIN the DOJ. So, part of the Executive. To "waive privilege" within a "department" says nothing about external.
Finally, they have been incorrect about nearly EVERYTHING they have said so far. I am not expecting the blind squirrels to have found a nut this time.
This post was edited on 5/8/19 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:25 pm to Walkthedawg
What's the precedence? None... then it's being set.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:25 pm to Walkthedawg
They mentioned it as an olive branch to the dems until they showed their arse. Now he is revoking that branch and saying frick all yall muthafrickas. You get nothing.
Nothing illegal about it
Nothing illegal about it
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:25 pm to Walkthedawg
The left made yuuuuge tactical mistake here.
DJT again is 10 steps ahead.
DJT again is 10 steps ahead.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:27 pm to Walkthedawg
quote:same assholes said it was OK for Kim Foxx in Chicago to “unrecuse” herself in the Smollett debacle.
Many leftist are saying once you waive Executive Privilege, you can't invoke it after the fact. What's the truth here?
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:27 pm to Walkthedawg
quote:
Update [June 28, 2012]: The House of Representatives voted to hold Holder in contempt, the first time in history for an attorney general. Most House Democrats, including minority leader Nancy Pelosi, walked out in protest amid the vote. It’s now up to the Justice Department to decide how to proceed.
So it was okay with democrats in 2012 but it's not now
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:28 pm to Walkthedawg
quote:Same truth.
What's the truth here?
Libtards are grasping for straws.
Just another "hey, look, a squirrel" dumbass move.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:28 pm to ShoeBang
quote:
They mentioned it as an olive branch to the dems until they showed their arse. Now he is revoking that branch and saying frick all yall muthafrickas. You get nothing.
I'm good with that, I just didn't know if there was any precedence for not invoking it and then invoking it.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:34 pm to Walkthedawg
They are LEFTIST, they have trouble telling the truth, and have a very hard time believing the truth, even when it hits them square in the face!!
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:42 pm to Walkthedawg
quote:
I just didn't know if there was any precedence for not invoking it and then invoking it.
Well I think if there is any argument, it was stated that Trump did not flex the privilege over the redactions themselves specifically. I don't remember anything ever being said about the unredacted version of the report at all and Trump waiving privilege . They tried to force Barr to give it up, pres said frick that.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 3:05 pm to Walkthedawg
Did he actually waive it or just not assert it before?
THere would be a difference
THere would be a difference
Posted on 5/8/19 at 3:16 pm to Walkthedawg
Trump only invoked executive privilege as to the "unredacted" report.
The dumbasses have the redacted report. Nobody is asking for the redacted report back.
In other words - the shite that was blacked out is still privileged, and it hasn't been waived.
The Zillion pages of evidence and testimony that this investigation was designed to elicit were provided to the executive branch and within it to comply with the E Branch's investigation of itself, not to be Oppo Research for Nadless (love this nickname for him and hat tip to brethren who dubbed him so recently).
Those documents weren't produced, and privilege wasn't waived there either.
Leftists are idiots. Barr knows the rule on privilege waivers. They have been completely outmaneuvered by an actual, bad arse lawyer.
Wednesday's sexy unsexy old boyfriend for life, Bill Barr.
The dumbasses have the redacted report. Nobody is asking for the redacted report back.
In other words - the shite that was blacked out is still privileged, and it hasn't been waived.
The Zillion pages of evidence and testimony that this investigation was designed to elicit were provided to the executive branch and within it to comply with the E Branch's investigation of itself, not to be Oppo Research for Nadless (love this nickname for him and hat tip to brethren who dubbed him so recently).
Those documents weren't produced, and privilege wasn't waived there either.
Leftists are idiots. Barr knows the rule on privilege waivers. They have been completely outmaneuvered by an actual, bad arse lawyer.
Wednesday's sexy unsexy old boyfriend for life, Bill Barr.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 3:17 pm to Walkthedawg
quote:
Many leftist are saying once you waive Executive Privilege, you can't invoke it after the fact. What's the truth here?
I haven't seen what these leftists are actually saying, but, generally, if any information has already been disclosed then one cannot try to assert privilege and "undisclose" it. I don't think that idea applies here.
The way I understand it, Trump is asserting executive privilege over the un-redacted Mueller report and all of the underlying documentary evidence, pending a review of what might actually be privileged and not subect to the subpoena.
Obviously, a redacted version of the Mueller report is already public, and Trump cannot now assert executive privilege over that....or even over the less redacted version that has supposedly been available to House Committees for a while now. But he can certainly still assert privilege over the redacted portions and any other information sought by the subpoena.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News