Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Entitlement Legislation Proposal

Posted on 4/10/17 at 9:30 am
Posted by cajuntiger26
Member since Jan 2013
338 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 9:30 am
This would be my attempt at entitlement reform. No, I do not think this will ever happen, but interested to see thoughts and arguments on the topic.

Legislation: In order to claim entitlement benefits such as Welfare and Food Stamps you would be required to do one of the following:

"Volunteer" for 20 hours a week at a
- Government agency (the bar is already low on their level of skill)
- Non-Profit (must be pre-approved)
- or Enroll in some type of education or trade school

Now obviously the devil is in the details on things like this, and there is going to be fraud in everything.
But overall would anyone have a reasonable objection to something like this?
Posted by Jay Quest
Once removed from Massachusetts
Member since Nov 2009
9804 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 9:33 am to
I have no problem with earning your welfare.

However:

Calls of racism and forced slavery are sure to follow.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 9:34 am to
You should absolutely have to work for your welfare.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67106 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 9:35 am to
They should be made to at least pick up trash along the highway.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 9:36 am to
quote:

- or Enroll in some type of education or trade school

with a minimum GPA?
Posted by cajuntiger26
Member since Jan 2013
338 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Calls of racism and forced slavery are sure to follow.



I agree 100%. But I would find it intriguing to hear the justification against this. And how they determine something like this to be racist.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67488 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 9:51 am to
quote:

"Volunteer" for 20 hours a week at a

OK I'm good with it
quote:

- Government agency (the bar is already low on their level of skill)

Huh? Yeah let's have even more people slowing down what little progress there is
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35406 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 9:51 am to
That is pretty much the case for welfare right now.

Food stamps: no. Most people on food stamps are working already and there are better ways to save money there.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 9:53 am to
quote:

That is pretty much the case for welfare right now.

Food


Are you serious?
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67106 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 9:54 am to
We had work requirements put in place by the Clinton Administration and the Congress, but Obama's stimulus package contained a provision allowing states to suspend the work requirement, which Louisiana did.
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
6455 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 9:55 am to
Playing devil's advocate here...

The overwhelming majority of welfare recipients are single working mothers.

Do you want them to take time off of work to do this volunteer work, or do you the government to establish some type of childcare program so it can happen?

This is the kind of stuff that sounds really good and seems to make sense, but when you objectively look at it you see it ends up putting more burden on the taxpayer, and it makes the program recipients more dependent on government.
Posted by cajuntiger26
Member since Jan 2013
338 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 10:02 am to
quote:

The overwhelming majority of welfare recipients are single working mothers.


If they are already working they would be exempt from this.

If they are not currently working then that would certainly be more challenging, but between all govt agencies and non-profits I think the opportunity to do both would be there.
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
6455 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 10:08 am to
quote:

If they are already working they would be exempt from this.

If they are not currently working then that would certainly be more challenging, but between all govt agencies and non-profits I think the opportunity to do both would be there.


So you exempting almost all adult Snap recipients and about half of the adult tanif recipients.

What do you want the minors to do? I assume they get an exemption to go to school.

So at the end of the day we have increased the governments role here for little or no benefit to society.

I agree with you in principle. We should only help those willing to help themselves, but in reality thats all we do anyway.

The Gingrich/Clinton welfare reforms accomplished a lot. The 70s-80s welfare queen stereotype just isn't a reality anymore.

Posted by Texas Weazel
Louisiana is a shithole
Member since Oct 2016
8539 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 10:48 am to
quote:

Calls of racism and forced slavery are sure to follow.

How so? People of every race use entitlements.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37106 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 11:27 am to
Work hours that result in trackable wages (i.e. A W-2, or a Sch C filed for odd jobs) should count towards the 20 hours a week requirement.

The problem, like others have said, are the ones that are not working are:

1) Home raising young kids during the day

2) Elderly/disabled and not physically able to work.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram