Started By
Message

re: End the mortgage interest deduction and lower rates

Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:17 pm to
Posted by AuburnTigers
Member since Aug 2013
6946 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:17 pm to
Says the guy that doesnt own a home or itemize haha
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
98930 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

The thing your sources arent telling you is that this wouldnt apply to housing below $500k.


Why do you hate the OT Ballers?


Hell, I'm expecting my next house to be valued over 500k.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20891 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

In the northeast it is not uncommon for a 4 bed, 2 bath, 2500 sq ft house to be well over $500k. I just looked on zillow around white plains new york and the average is 800-900k range.


Thats true, but it's also limited to basically Bergen county NJ and Westchester, NY, where 4 bedroom raised ranches go for $750k, and property taxes are $15k+/year... It's also literally the most expensive place to live across the country. I would hardly call this "middle class".

I know this because I live close by.

Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

Thats true, but it's also limited to basically Bergen county NJ and Westchester, NY, where 4 bedroom raised ranches go for $750k, and property taxes are $15k+/year... It's also literally the most expensive place to live

and full of shitlibs
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
18191 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:24 pm to
It would be smarter for the government to get out of direct subsidies for mortgages like Fannie and Freddie. I hear what you're saying however.

quote:

At the same it would lower fed taxes for almost everyone. In essence this is a tax on the upper clasd, you should be in favor of this.


The people that are uber wealthy would just put their home in some sort of LLC and claim the write off as part of a business.
This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 4:28 pm
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:41 pm to
quote:


it would probably destroy the housing market. Suburbs would be hardest hit.


OMG

How stupid is that thinking??

Who ever said "I am going out to buy a house because the interest on the money I borrow for it is tax deductible"?
This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 5:00 pm
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

I'm not saying the interest deduction is sacrosanct but your premise assumes facts not in evidence


What facts not in evidence??

Interest rates are low and have been a long, long time.
This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 4:53 pm
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

ANYTHING that reduces taxes is OK with me.


Then you should be happy I am calling for lower overall rates.

Only the naive and mathematically challenged would rather a deduction that requires you to borrow money to a lower overall tax rate.
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32673 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:45 pm to
I just bought my first house and I agree completely about the mortgage interest deduction. Just lower rates, get rid of the deductions and simplify the tax code. Why is this so damn hard.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:49 pm to
Just get rid of the deduction altogether. It is stupid to prefer a deduction for some sort of behavior to an overall tax cut.

A person with a $250K mortgage at 3.5% pays only $8750 in interest the first year of his mortgage. If that person is in a 35% marginal tax bracket it saves him only $3062 in taxes. If the taxes were lowered to 30% it would only take $61240 in income to make up the difference.

Who has less than $61240 in income with a $250 house mortgage???
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

Says the guy that doesnt own a home or itemize haha


no--says the guy with simple math skills.

I believe some of you would prefer taxes with a home mortgage deduction to no taxes at all.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67858 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:51 pm to
Go to the FairTax and I am good with canning this deduction.
Posted by LSUwag
Florida man
Member since Jan 2007
17319 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:51 pm to
Hell no!

There is no justification in raising taxes on middle class people.

Raise the taxes on the top 1%. They have a massive accumulation of wealth.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Hell no!

There is no justification in raising taxes on middle class people


Can you explain how lowering the tax rate and getting rid of the mortgage tax deduction raises taxes???
Posted by LSUwag
Florida man
Member since Jan 2007
17319 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:59 pm to
Because they will eliminate the mortgage and then not reduce the tax rate. Even if they initially do, they will soon raise it back to the original level.

Politicians lie.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Because they will eliminate the mortgage and then not reduce the tax rate. Even if they initially do, they will soon raise it back to the original level.

Politicians lie.


So they will just raise the rates and keep the deduction and you favor that.

How simple minded is that?

What part of this example do you not understand?

quote:

A person with a $250K mortgage at 3.5% pays only $8750 in interest the first year of his mortgage. If that person is in a 35% marginal tax bracket it saves him only $3062 in taxes. If the taxes were lowered to 30% it would only take $61240 in income to make up the difference.

Who has less than $61240 in income with a $250 house mortgage???
This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 5:02 pm
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21873 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

Congress forgets the interests have been below 5% for 10 years or more. That deduction doesn't mean near as much as it did in the eighties when rates were 12%.



This is the biggest reason why it won't even be considered for removal. It doesn't do much.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:09 pm to
Maybe since it is not much now they will elect to take this one simplification step.

You see how people are so quick to scream and not think in this thread--just think about that nation wide.

They act like they will never be without a house mortgage.
This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 5:11 pm
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

No one likes them, but that's how we pay for the shite our government spends. If you want to really address the problem go after gov spending.



Yeah or drive down to their odfices, on paved roads, wave to some police, military, cross bridges..etc.
Posted by dartman
baton rouge
Member since Nov 2015
172 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 5:19 pm to
I agree... with the Fair Tax, everyone pays something, even those who deal in cash. The big spenders pay more, the little guys pay less and there's a built in protection for the poorest... Everyone is refunded up to the poverty level... You can then nail the doors to the IRS shut!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram