Started By
Message
locked post

End the mortgage interest deduction and lower rates

Posted on 8/4/17 at 2:59 pm
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 2:59 pm
Some say this deduction is untouchable---hogwash!!

Lower the tax rate 4 or 5 points and I will gladly give up the mortgage interest deduction.

Congress forgets the interests have been below 5% for 10 years or more. That deduction doesn't mean near as much as it did in the eighties when rates were 12%.

This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 4:57 pm
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

Some say this deduction is untouchable---hogwash!!

Lower the rate 4 or 5 points and I will gladly give up the mortgage interest deduction.

Congress forgets the interests have been below 5% for 10 years or more. That deduction doesn't mean near as much as it did in the eighties when rates were 12%.


it would probably destroy the housing market. Suburbs would be hardest hit.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:07 pm to
quote:


Lower the rate 4 or 5 points and I will gladly give up the mortgage interest deduction
did you say this like the government can just buy Fiat lower interest rates on homes. It could just as easily happen that they remove the deduction and rates go up

I'm not saying the interest deduction is sacrosanct but your premise assumes facts not in evidence
Posted by schexyoung
Deaf Valley
Member since May 2008
6534 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:09 pm to
Just eliminate income tax all together.

Tax property (land and improvements) at the federal level. It doesn't move. It can't be hidden. The enforcement expenditure would be minimal. It could be done on a postcard. No more 10,000 page corporate and personal income tax code.

Current income tax payers would enjoy lower effective rates overall thanks to the easy collection from previous non payers.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26637 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:09 pm to
Why do you like taxes so much?

ANYTHING that reduces taxes is OK with me.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14477 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:09 pm to
Agree
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14477 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Why do you like taxes so much?

ANYTHING that reduces taxes is OK with me.


You saw the part where he lowers rates, right?

Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20868 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

would probably destroy the housing market. Suburbs would be hardest hit.




Come on man.

The thing your sources arent telling you is that this wouldnt apply to housing below $500k.

At the same it would lower fed taxes for almost everyone. In essence this is a tax on the upper clasd, you should be in favor of this.

How many "middle class" suburbs do you know of where median house price is above $500k?
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29134 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Why do you like taxes so much?



No one likes them, but that's how we pay for the shite our government spends. If you want to really address the problem go after gov spending.
Posted by Ingloriousbastard
Member since May 2015
917 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:12 pm to
I think they just need to determine what's taxable and tax everything the same when purchased. Eliminate income taxes.
This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 3:13 pm
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26637 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:13 pm to
LOL.

I'm not a small government guy.

I'm a microscopic government guy.

Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

would probably destroy the housing market. Suburbs would be hardest hit.

could just play with lowering that $1mil cap to something like $500K
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73196 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

it would probably destroy the housing market. Suburbs would be hardest hit.


How would it be destroyed
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19669 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Just eliminate income tax all together. 

Tax property (land and improvements) at the federal level. It doesn't move. It can't be hidden. The enforcement expenditure would be minimal. It could be done on a postcard. No more 10,000 page corporate and personal income tax code. 
as long as only property owners get to vote. Better is replace income tax with an appropriately scaled revenue neutral national sales tax. Gets rid of the irs, generates tax revenue even from illegals, criminals who don't report income but still have to buy stuff. Then you take the trained irs auditors and sick some of them on Medicare and Medicaid fraud, which is several hundred billion dollars yearly. You take the rest and have them audit the financial interests of every single congressman, senator, and major beuracrat in the federal government.
This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 3:52 pm
Posted by schexyoung
Deaf Valley
Member since May 2008
6534 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

as long as only property owners get to vote.


Property tax would be indirectly paid by using services on property. Renters indirectly pay through their landlord. Restaurants, retail, industrial, etc. all charged property tax and all capable of passing it down via their products or services.

Nearly every stat already has appraisal data on most properties.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Come on man.


no seriously. It would make home ownership less attractive. This would be especially true in areas where people "reach" for a bigger home, i.e. the suburbs and people just getting into the housing market.

quote:

The thing your sources arent telling you is that this wouldnt apply to housing below $500k.


That would definitely make a difference. Although in denver, middle class homes are getting close to 500k. Certainly the case in any many cities.

quote:

At the same it would lower fed taxes for almost everyone. In essence this is a tax on the upper clasd, you should be in favor of this.


My home is worth far more than 500k. I might be helped by this, or I might be hurt.

But this would be a painful transition. And very unpopular.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27338 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:58 pm to
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!! You are bad man, you want to expose the fact that most people who say they are against welfare by taking away the middle class' and upper middle class' biggest source of said welfare.

Watch the doctors, lawyers and engineers howl!!!!!!!!
Posted by Mike Honcho
North Dallas
Member since Oct 2007
2918 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

How many "middle class" suburbs do you know of where median house price is above $500k?


In the northeast it is not uncommon for a 4 bed, 2 bath, 2500 sq ft house to be well over $500k. I just looked on zillow around white plains new york and the average is 800-900k range.
Posted by Kraut Dawg
Member since Sep 2012
4503 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:10 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 9:47 am
Posted by westerntigerfan
Member since Oct 2012
886 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Better is replace income tax with an appropriately scaled revenue neutral national sales tax. Gets rid of the irs, generates tax revenue even from illegals, criminals who don't report income but still have to buy stuff. Then you take the trained irs auditors and sick some of them on Medicare and Medicaid fraud, which is several hundred billion dollars yearly. You take the rest and have them audit the financial interests of every single congressman, senator, and major beuracrat in the federal government.


Sign me up for this, every word of it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram