re: DOJ Again Refuses to Give Judge Boasberg Sensitive Information on National Security

quote:

---

The statute specifically grants the authority to determine that to the president. The district court doesn't get to grade his work.

---

So what is the remedy if the executive acts beyond this limited statutory authority? Impeachment exclusively?

so fricking what?

Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 was ratified by the continental congress at our founding. You are trying to ackshywully the board with this crap.

quote:

---

a. Is there an "invasion or predatory incursion"?

b. If that can be determined, what "foreign nation or government" directing this specific "invasion or predatory incursion"? Specifically, here, what official acts of Venezuela are directly associated with the "invasion or predatory incursion" (the acts used to define a) by TDA?

---

I don't believe this is subject to judicial oversight. This is strictly under the authority of the president.

The executive doesn't have prove whether something is a matter of national security to a court. That is subjective and there is no way it could be proven, especially if it was based on classified information.

I can't even imagine a court proceeding where something like that would even take place. It's comical, just on its face.

quote:

---

So what is the remedy if the executive acts beyond this limited statutory authority? Impeachment exclusively?

---

same as pardons.

Good. You think we want unelected activist judges unilaterally steering our government??

quote:

---

We have courts that are high enough to be a remedy.

---

See? This is why y'all need to all get on the same page with this one.

quote:

---

The absurdity is pretending "national security" has anything to do with deporting some Venezuelan thugs.

---

Your opinion as well as that of the nobody judge is noted and it carries exactly as much weight as mine when it comes to overruling the executive. That's the thing you fricking absurd people need to get through your head. We're not playing this stupid shite anymore where Lower Court judges apparently think they're co-equal to the president. They aren't. It's nothing but a bastardized interpretation

quote:

---

You think we want unelected activist judges unilaterally steering our government??

---

I want them to be able to stop violations of law by the Executive when needed.

quote:

---

You keep getting your fee fees mixed up with reality.

---

Even using your histrionic terms.

There is no actual national security issue involved.

quote:

---

See? This is why y'all need to all get on the same page with this one.

---

I'm not worried about being on the same page. I speak my opinions and if they happen to agree with somebody great if they don't I don't give a frick. It's completely absurd to interpret the Constitution to mean that every single lower court judge is co equal with the Congress and the president. No rational human being can think through that for a second and not see how stupid it is. It effectively makes Lower Court judges more powerful on an individual basis than Appellate Court judges. The only reason anybody is acting like this makes sense is because they like the result. Now I'm not really a fan of Marbury versus Madison. I think it over steps too but at least it was issued by a court that really is one of the three co-equal branches