- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DOJ Again Refuses to Give Judge Boasberg Sensitive Information on National Security
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:05 pm to Vacherie Saint
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:05 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
He literally is.
I don’t disagree. It’s folks like SFP that seem to think that Trump just used this statute as a quicker and easier way to deport run of the mill criminal illegals.
2
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:06 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
"But drUmpf cant use the alien enemies act because TDA isnt aligned with a foreign government!!!"
-said the retards
only trump has said that the government of Venezuela was behind this...no evidence supports that, and the DOJ is failing to provide any to the judge.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:07 pm to LSUFAITHFUL2
SFP is just going to be a contrarian 100% of the time. His argument has been whittled down to his personal opinion that TDA shouldn't be designated as a terrorist group. I'd advise you ignore him unless your responses are for mockery or pwnage purposes.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:07 pm to GamecockUltimate
They don't have to. The judge has no standing in this matter.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:08 pm to narddogg81
quote:
tren de aragua is a designated terrorist group, and the stuff they do to people is certainly terror. seriously go frick yourself
I have never seen this level of unified emotional reaction on this board...or at least since the same tactics were used to support the invasion of Iraq.
This is some crazy psychological experiment going on in real time and it's fascinating.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:08 pm to GamecockUltimate
did you read the post I was responding to? They are globally known to be aligned with Maduro's cartel. This is only disputed by the Maduro regime and American democrats... Birds of a feather
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:08 pm to LSUFAITHFUL2
quote:
It’s folks like SFP that seem to think that Trump just used this statute as a quicker and easier way to deport run of the mill criminal illegals.
That's literally what is going on.
You can ree all you want, but they could have expedited ordinary deportation proceedings to Venezuela like they have with other criminals.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:09 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
did you read the post I was responding to? They are globally known to be aligned with Maduro's cartel. This is only disputed by the Maduro regime and American democrats... Birds of a feather
If only the administration had to prove this in court
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:10 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
They don't have to. The judge has no standing in this matter.
His court would have jurisdiction to rule on a case where a person within the district-- i.e. someone being deported under the statute-- challenged the statue's application.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
Are you insinuating that Repubs and Dems weren't unified in going into Iraq in 2003?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:11 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
No but he is obligated to explain why it’s a state secret. he can’t just say “sorry state secret” otherwise the Government would never disclose anything.
Huh??? That's exactly what Smith did in the Mar A Lago frick show!!!
Once again, Trump is not obligated to explain matters of national security. It's his determination what can or can't be revealed/discussed.
Not a federal judge.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's literally what is going on.
Sure, just keep ignoring all things I cited…like The NY Times, the Chilean Govt, the Miami Herald, and LMaduro’s opposition (the rightly elected VZ govt) that agree with Trump—-that Maduro is running TdA.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's literally what is going on.
Sure, just keep ignoring all things I cited…like The NY Times, the Chilean Govt, the Miami Herald, and Maduro’s opposition (the rightly elected VZ govt) that agree with Trump—-that Maduro is running TdA.
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:12 pm to therick711
quote:
Unless said action is non justiciable as this one is.
whether his actions fall under this law is justiciable.
like Ludecke was able to challenge whether a declared war was going on if hostilities had stopped.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:13 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
They don't have to. The judge has no standing in this matter.
They do. you cant just pull out this uno card and get to bypass the constitution with zero evidence to support your reasoning. You in some way have to prove that the judge has no standing in this matter. Otherwise someone should be held in contempt of court for defying a judges order hours before a court date
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:13 pm to YumYum Sauce
keep reading the sentence for the important part.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If only the administration had to prove this in court
If only there was a co-equal branch that could check such executive power and provide protections to the use of a law it passed that it wanted implemented by the executive.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If only the administration had to prove this in court
Supreme Court says he doesn’t have to. Not justiciable.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:14 pm to GamecockUltimate
They don't in this matter.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:15 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
did you read the post I was responding to? They are globally known to be aligned with Maduro's cartel. This is only disputed by the Maduro regime and American democrats... Birds of a feather
A cartel is not a nation or government. It doesnt fall under the aliens enemies act unless the Venezuelan government specifically told them to invade. Again this act has not be used in any times that were not declared war times. Lets be honest 200 people is not really an invasion or an incursion .
Page 12 of 22
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News