- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you believe there is any truth to 9/11 conspiracy theories?
Posted on 3/1/17 at 9:27 am to DavidTheGnome
Posted on 3/1/17 at 9:27 am to DavidTheGnome
This is a movement led by Architects and engineers that are highly skilled and among the tops in their field. Combine that with the movement by pilots for a 911 truth, that question the plane that hit the Pentagon, you have to at least consider their evidence.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 10:07 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:I can only speak for myself. Lumping me in with everything everyone else says is ridiculous. Yet it remains this board's best rebuttal.
Neither would have any reason to ever fake news or information.
Yeah, because that's the only implication made by truthers.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 10:10 am to Placebeaux
quote:And don't forget the victim's families for 9/11 truth....
This is a movement led by Architects and engineers that are highly skilled and among the tops in their field. Combine that with the movement by pilots for a 911 truth, that question the plane that hit the Pentagon, you have to at least consider their evidence.
.... and the fate of its spokesperson upon presenting her grievances to Obama. Just a coincidence, I'm sure.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 10:10 am to TX Tiger
quote:
I can only speak for myself.
Likewise, and I didn't lump you in with anyone.
*edit*
quote:
Yet it remains this board's best rebuttal.
Also, I disagree with this. Rebuttal to what, exactly?
This post was edited on 3/1/17 at 10:11 am
Posted on 3/1/17 at 10:15 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Sorry if I misread your intent.
I can only speak for myself.
Likewise, and I didn't lump you in with anyone. *edit*
quote:Rebuttal to anything that varies from the "official" story.
Yet it remains this board's best rebuttal.
Also, I disagree with this. Rebuttal to what, exactly?
Posted on 3/1/17 at 10:19 am to TX Tiger
quote:
Sorry if I misread your intent.
No worries.
quote:
Rebuttal to anything that varies from the "official" story.
Like what? I've seen the passport and steel beams points countered without going after anyone. In fact, it was quite the opposite.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 10:23 am to goldennugget
quote:
Foreign intelligence agencies were. Maybe a handful of CIA.
I don't know; I'm thinking the CIA could have managed to get a key card and train a couple of guys to use the shredder.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 11:13 am to kingbob
quote:
I am a structural engineer who used to build steel framed buildings for a living. The "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" people are simply retarded. As said many many times, steel weakens enough to fail long before it melts, and will do so at temperatures it can be exposed to during fires of routine office materials. That's why steel members are equipped with fireproofing.
In the case of the Twin Towers, said fireproofing would have been partially stripped by the planes crashing into them. This would expose enough steel to the fire to weaken the steel significantly to trigger a collapse.
Come at me bro
AND
significantly softened steel would allow a building to achieve free fall acceleration?
(it's a question - no I wasn't there)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)