- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DO NOT ever threaten someone for risk of losing gun rights.
Posted on 6/21/24 at 2:46 pm to momentoftruth87
Posted on 6/21/24 at 2:46 pm to momentoftruth87
I'm aware. Been through all that. You still have to go through family court.
Posted on 6/21/24 at 2:48 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
What happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Do you believe in arrest and pre-trial detention? Those actions take away a far more fundamental right long before a person can have the opportunity to exonerate themselves.
Posted on 6/21/24 at 3:22 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
It's not a fricking Bill of Needs. We either have those rights, or we don't.
Then it’s a travesty that inmates in Angola State Penitentiary maximum security block to not be able to freely carry high capacity tactical shotguns. Loaded with .00 buckshot, because why not.
Posted on 6/21/24 at 3:59 pm to davyjones
quote:
Then it’s a travesty that inmates in Angola State Penitentiary maximum security block to not be able to freely carry high capacity tactical shotguns. Loaded with .00 buckshot, because why not.
Look at you, still playing BamaAtl's Greatest Hits.
Up next, Muh You Can't Keep and Bear Tactical Nukes!!!!
Posted on 6/21/24 at 4:07 pm to fwtex
Those convicted of domestic violence aren’t allowed to legally buy a gun anyways. Even misdemeanor. If someone wants to file a VPO there is a pretty low threshold. Basically have to be in a relationship with the other party and show the court your ex, or whoever is threatening you. You can’t file a VPO against someone who mean mugs you at the bar or your ex’s new boyfriend. Vast majority are temporary orders.
Posted on 6/21/24 at 4:13 pm to FCarole
I am and you are correct. Too damn ambiguous for me.
Posted on 6/21/24 at 4:14 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
It’s now becoming clear that you’re the one who needs to be targeted by these limited curtailments. In which region are you located? Directional is fine. I assume midwest but would feel much better if I knew for certain.
Posted on 6/21/24 at 4:15 pm to davyjones
I'm in Arizona currently. Good luck, sport. 
Posted on 6/21/24 at 4:19 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
You been setting up information kiosks near the border advising illegals that in America they have every right to pack heat? To strap up? To exercise the right to arm themselves to the hilt?
Posted on 6/21/24 at 4:19 pm to DocYatesVA
quote:
If someone has demonstrated threatening behavior, and in cases of domestic violence where emotional instability may be at play, they really do not need access to a firearm.
I guess they can use a knife, shovel, hammer, rope, automobile, truck, wood chipper, etc. instead.
Now we understand what the goooooooooooooberment fears!
Posted on 6/21/24 at 4:32 pm to davyjones
I've been fighting for the preservation of our Second Amendment rights, and a reversal of previous erosion of the same. 
Posted on 6/21/24 at 4:37 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
I got no problem with that. I love and admire the Second Amendment but do believe there are very narrow, limited circumstances in which the right is not ubiquitous. I don’t think illegally crossing foreigners should be extended the unfettered right, for instance. Do you, just out of curiosity?
Posted on 6/21/24 at 4:51 pm to davyjones
quote:
I love and admire the Second Amendment but
Yep, there it is.
Every. Time.
quote:
I don’t think illegally crossing foreigners should be extended the unfettered right, for instance. Do you, just out of curiosity?
My position is simple. The Second Amendment says that any government infringement on our natural right to keep and bear arms for self-defense is unconstitutional. If someone is here illegally, that's an entirely separate issue.
Posted on 6/21/24 at 4:53 pm to Timeoday
quote:Are you familiar with the facts of this case? He brazenly pointed and then fired a weapon at strangers multiple times.
The SCOTUS says your gun rights can be infringed. Wow!! For instance, a person feels "threatened" because someone legally carrying a gun makes eye contact with them. What happens next is now an unknown!! The door just opened very wide for lawyers to make bank. Lawyers looking after lawyers.
This guy should never touch another firearm in his life.
Posted on 6/21/24 at 5:00 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Really? Well then where does it say in the Second Amendment or anywhere else in the Constitution that it doesn’t apply to illegal aliens? Looks like you’re carving out an exception of your own fruition. Common sense is what justifies that “exception” for me. Plain ole common sense. What’s your excuse? 
This post was edited on 6/21/24 at 5:05 pm
Posted on 6/21/24 at 5:08 pm to davyjones
quote:
Well then where does it say in the Second Amendment or anywhere else in the Constitution that it doesn’t apply to illegal aliens?
Your question indicates confusion.
What's confusing to you?
Posted on 6/21/24 at 5:11 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
I’m a pretty forgiving person. I don’t blame you for avoiding the question. I’m not out to make you look foolish.
Posted on 6/21/24 at 5:14 pm to davyjones
I'm thinking the question is unnecessary. If you'll indulge me, we'll get to the bottom of it.
Again, where's your confusion?
Again, where's your confusion?
Posted on 6/21/24 at 5:27 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
I’m trying to translate for you here. Confusion definitely doesn’t fit. You’re extremely confused and all mixed up with your words.
Posted on 6/21/24 at 5:31 pm to davyjones
Let me put this another way...
You wouldn't be asking that question if you understood the point.
Let's not waste time on irrelevant questions. Let's make sure you understand the point instead...
You wouldn't be asking that question if you understood the point.
Let's not waste time on irrelevant questions. Let's make sure you understand the point instead...
Popular
Back to top


0






