Started By
Message
locked post

Did we have enough hospital beds for the 274,304 that were hospitalized from H1N1?

Posted on 3/28/20 at 12:39 am
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 12:39 am
Fatality rate is no longer a valid argument LINK

China virus Being a Novel Virus doesn’t hold weight when you consider that H1N1 was also a novel virus and didn’t receive the same reaction.

Vaccine argument doesn’t hold weight because we have a vaccine for seasonal flu and 80,000 Americans still died from it 2 flu seasons ago.

Cure argument doesn’t hold weight because the flu doesn’t have a cure and no one freaks out.

Lack of ventilators doesn’t hold weight because no US hospital has reached a point to where they were treating so many patients on a ventilator that they ran out.

So they only argument left is hospital beds. So I’m asking now....how did we have enough hospital beds for the 274,304 people who were hospitalized by the swine flu? Also what about the 710,000 that were hospitalized from the flu 2 flu seasons ago?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68301 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 12:42 am to
What was the time period for H1N1? Over how many months were the hospitalizations spread?
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
32482 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 12:43 am to
So we wait till all that happens before taking preventative measures is what you want?
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27250 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 12:45 am to
Did H1N1 hit and explode exponentially in 10 days?

Was it so contagious that places saw positive infections doubling every two days?
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 12:47 am to
Well why is granny out in public, I thought we were all saving granny.
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 12:50 am to
quote:

So we wait till all that happens before taking preventative measures is what you want?


My point is this is the first time the media has made a pandemic a big deal and everyone freaked out and shut shite down.
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 12:53 am to
quote:

Was it so contagious that places saw positive infections doubling every two days?


Were they as obsessed with testing then as they are now?
This post was edited on 3/28/20 at 12:58 am
Posted by MAGA
Member since Sep 2016
581 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 12:54 am to
You cannot compare 1800 (covid) deaths to 15,000 (h1n1) or seasonal flu (23,000 to date this year).

It is not the same.

Same with hospitals being full. My dad was in the hospital in February and the hospital only had a couple of available rooms. Pneumonia and hit him hard (72 y/o).

Those 15,000 deaths from h1n1 are different....it’s a percentage thing.

And this is more contagious....it’ll make it to 60 million like h1n1 probably (maybe)...once it doubles again next week (or whenever).

Kinda like Cuomo saying he has to have the vents now - but they are going to warehouse them until he needs them (maybe).

Yeah, that’s the ticket.
Posted by LSU2a
SWLA to Dallas
Member since Aug 2012
2849 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 12:58 am to
quote:

Lack of ventilators doesn’t hold weight because no US hospital has reached a point to where they were treating so many patients on a ventilator that they ran out.


Oh cool, the number of hospitalized peaked already? You must have a good source for that.

quote:

So they only argument left is hospital beds.


You must have missed the whole part about rate of infection or rate of hospitalization having the potential to overwhelm hospitals. The stay at home orders were to slow the spread of COVID-19 since there was no widespread immunity to it and it is over three times as infectious as the Flu. Congratulations on creating a straw man argument and conveniently forgetting the main argument for Trump and every other leader's response.

Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162231 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 12:59 am to
quote:



Fauci is backtracking so is his previous statement correct or his most recent one?

He isn't back tracking. He said it's like a very bad flu

The seasonal influenze (i.e. not a very bad flu) is what has a .1% mortality rate

He is claiming that it is ten times that. The data we have so far seems to be much closer to 1% than it is to .1%

In fact right now it's at ~1.5%
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111546 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 12:59 am to
You didn’t even read what you highlighted.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162231 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 1:00 am to
quote:

You didn’t even read what you highlighted.

Or comprehend
Posted by MF Doom
I'm only Joshin'
Member since Oct 2008
11712 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 1:01 am to
Heckin deep state is so powerful they forced other countries to shut down and destroy their own economy. All because they’re trying to ruin trump. Argh!
Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
9426 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 1:01 am to
I think novel means "new". Is this sis in law again?
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 1:03 am to
quote:

Oh cool, the number of hospitalized peaked already? You must have a good source for that.


Oh you mean to the peak numbers they just admitted they were dead wrong about? All of this BS is nothing but what if scenarios. How can you say we don’t have enough if we haven’t ran out?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111546 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 1:04 am to
quote:

What was the time period for H1N1? Over how many months were the hospitalizations spread?


The hospitalizations were over one year. So, 274k/12 would be 22,900 hospitalizations/mo.

That would be 500,000 CV patients in a month with a 4.4% hospitalization rate. Assuming worst case that the hospitalized were hospitalized for a month.
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 1:06 am to
quote:

You didn’t even read what you highlighted.


Read the sentence right before the highlighted parts. Says considerably below 1%. Fauci authored that and it’s more recent than the 10x comment.
This post was edited on 3/28/20 at 1:08 am
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162231 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 1:06 am to
quote:

How can you say we don’t have enough if we haven’t ran out?



I'm sure the Army Corps of Engineers is rushing to turn this NY convention center into a make shift hospital for absolutely no reason.

LINK
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111546 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 1:08 am to
quote:

Says considerably below 1%.


It also says “may.” You are a stupid frick.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162231 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 1:12 am to
quote:

It also says “may.”

And it's making the assumption that there are considerably more unconfirmed asymptomatic cases

From known cases we're looking at around 1.5% mortality in the United States from the data coming in so far. That's higher by a factor of 15. Even if you cut that in half it would be 7 times the mortality rate with what is a more easily transmittable strain than common influenza strains
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram