- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did republicans hold closed door meetings impeaching Clinton?
Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:28 pm to Janky
Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:28 pm to Janky
quote:
Dude, nobody is reading all that shite every time you decide to post.
Here - I put all those words into a convenient graphical representation that you will better understand:

Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:29 pm to ConwayGamecock
So, again Trump has to prove that he is not guilty?
Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:30 pm to ConwayGamecock
quote:
And what actual PROOF do you have, that he wasn't??
Now I see. You're joking around. Ok, you got me/us....it's humorous I guess.
This post was edited on 10/26/19 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:33 pm to ConwayGamecock
Hey look guys, I’m a Trumptard now!
There doesn’t need to be proof that he wasn’t, a presumption of innocence is paramount in our legal system.
I’m not saying that an investigation was unwarranted, I just don’t think there is any way you prove wrongdoing.
There doesn’t need to be proof that he wasn’t, a presumption of innocence is paramount in our legal system.
I’m not saying that an investigation was unwarranted, I just don’t think there is any way you prove wrongdoing.
Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:36 pm to Janky
Some people are saying after everything comes there won’t even be an election.
Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:39 pm to Bwmdx
quote:
Some people are saying after everything comes there won’t even be an election
Wut?
Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:41 pm to DeathAndTaxes
I think he stroked out.
Posted on 10/26/19 at 3:27 pm to ConwayGamecock
quote:
Independent Counsel
By IC I meant Intelligence Community. As in Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act.
But let me read through the rest of your post because you seem to have some knowledge.
Just so you know, my angle is NOT that oppose an inquiry (though I think it is purely politically motivated). Inquire all you want, nances. I believe the quorum clause REQUIRES the full house vote to pass a resolution to authorize any business of the House to be conducted.
In other words, the constitution doesn't give Nances the authority to declare peach mint inquiries without representatives going on record on what their position is- very un-democratic!
Posted on 10/28/19 at 6:28 am to DeathAndTaxes
quote:
Look man, someone asked a sincere question, I gave a sincere answer.
You can take your bullshite somewhere else.
Look man, I gave a sincere answer. This move by Schiff is unprecedented in most ways. You posted about "outside inquiries" which is either being willfully ignorant or trying to muddy the water on the appropriateness of what is going on.
You take your bullshite and eat it.
Popular
Back to top

0





