Started By
Message

re: Did republicans hold closed door meetings impeaching Clinton?

Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:28 pm to
Posted by ConwayGamecock
South Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
9121 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Dude, nobody is reading all that shite every time you decide to post.


Here - I put all those words into a convenient graphical representation that you will better understand:

Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:29 pm to
So, again Trump has to prove that he is not guilty?
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36731 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

And what actual PROOF do you have, that he wasn't??

Now I see. You're joking around. Ok, you got me/us....it's humorous I guess.
This post was edited on 10/26/19 at 2:32 pm
Posted by DeathAndTaxes
Member since Oct 2019
238 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:33 pm to
Hey look guys, I’m a Trumptard now!

There doesn’t need to be proof that he wasn’t, a presumption of innocence is paramount in our legal system.

I’m not saying that an investigation was unwarranted, I just don’t think there is any way you prove wrongdoing.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36731 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:34 pm to
Trumptard for a day
Posted by Bwmdx
Member since Dec 2018
3434 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:36 pm to
Some people are saying after everything comes there won’t even be an election.
Posted by DeathAndTaxes
Member since Oct 2019
238 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Some people are saying after everything comes there won’t even be an election


Wut?
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 2:41 pm to
I think he stroked out.
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14977 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Independent Counsel


By IC I meant Intelligence Community. As in Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act.

But let me read through the rest of your post because you seem to have some knowledge.

Just so you know, my angle is NOT that oppose an inquiry (though I think it is purely politically motivated). Inquire all you want, nances. I believe the quorum clause REQUIRES the full house vote to pass a resolution to authorize any business of the House to be conducted.

In other words, the constitution doesn't give Nances the authority to declare peach mint inquiries without representatives going on record on what their position is- very un-democratic!
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
24825 posts
Posted on 10/28/19 at 6:28 am to
quote:

Look man, someone asked a sincere question, I gave a sincere answer.

You can take your bullshite somewhere else.


Look man, I gave a sincere answer. This move by Schiff is unprecedented in most ways. You posted about "outside inquiries" which is either being willfully ignorant or trying to muddy the water on the appropriateness of what is going on.

You take your bullshite and eat it.

first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram