- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Details on Trump's Thursday Night Address to the Nation
Posted on 7/14/26 at 12:34 pm to RichardPound
Posted on 7/14/26 at 12:34 pm to RichardPound
What's so funny?
Do you deny that arrests are beginning to happen? The DoJ would disagree with you.
Are you always this dumb?
quote:
arrests begin to happen
Do you deny that arrests are beginning to happen? The DoJ would disagree with you.
Are you always this dumb?
Posted on 7/14/26 at 12:34 pm to BoarEd
quote:
refused to do so yourself,
caught in your 2nd lie in this thread alone
Posted on 7/14/26 at 12:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
Wrong again. You tried to bait people into making predictions after implying this will only be about the indictment of the Iranians. I asked you to go on record saying you believed it will only be about the Iranian indictments since that was what you were implying, you failed to do so and then when called out you went back and edited your post with a non-commital response about the briefing being "for putting pressure on Iran and the SAVE Act "
You want others to be specific while avoiding specificity yourself.
And then you lied when you said that the Iranian thing is all the leaks are talking about. You were called on your bullshite there as well.
So, in true to Democrat form, you have executed perfect psychological projection. You lied twice and then when called out you said I lied twice. Which makes your third lie.
You want others to be specific while avoiding specificity yourself.
And then you lied when you said that the Iranian thing is all the leaks are talking about. You were called on your bullshite there as well.
So, in true to Democrat form, you have executed perfect psychological projection. You lied twice and then when called out you said I lied twice. Which makes your third lie.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 12:45 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Wrong again. You tried to bait people into making predictions after implying this will only be about the indictment of the Iranians. I asked you to go on record saying you believed it will only be about the Iranian indictments since that was what you were implying,
Note: My prediction was made in this very thread, and your responded to the post
quote:
What if it's to justify more war with Iran? Put pressure for the SAVE Act?
That's what I believe the purpose will be.
Note: my edit was at 11:37 and your response was 11:39 so it existed when you responded.
Don't forget this
quote:
What I imagine is going to happen is a lot of true believers are going to try to dishonestly claim this information about Iran somehow supports Q nonsense or muh steal claims, when it doesn't seem to have any overlap with either. So I'm asking for the evidence ahead of time.
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 7/14/26 at 1:40 pm to BoarEd
Posted on 7/14/26 at 1:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
You're boring, man. You still gave a non-commital answer after being asked to go on record like you asked others to do. You know it and everyone reading this thread knows it. And your stuff about Q is irrelevant and off topic.
Go frick off some place else or something.
Go frick off some place else or something.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 1:49 pm to BoarEd
quote:
You still gave a non-commital answer
I did not
quote:
after being asked to go on record like you asked others to do.
I did. I'll repeat again:
quote:
What if it's to justify more war with Iran? Put pressure for the SAVE Act?
That's what I believe the purpose will be.
It's not complicated. Iran isn't specifically necessary for that to unfold.
But the most important part is that the muh Steal nonsense doesn't appear to have anything to do with what Trump's likely to speak about Thursday (considering it's declassified and about foreign interference).
quote:
And your stuff about Q is irrelevant and off topic.
Is it?
Also my comments cover Q and muh Steal
Going back to OP, you said
quote:
Get ready for the meltdowns.
Who is going to meltdown? Why?
Posted on 7/14/26 at 1:49 pm to BoarEd
quote:
"plans to claim"
Or is it to... present evidence?
Posted on 7/14/26 at 2:06 pm to BoarEd
Oh please.
Refresh my memory. Who's administration was in place during the 2020 election???
Refresh my memory. Who's administration was in place during the 2020 election???
Posted on 7/14/26 at 3:17 pm to BoarEd
Posted on 7/14/26 at 3:53 pm to Kjnstkmn
quote:
But we don’t need ALL of them to accept it, we just need to reach “critical mass”. We just need a certain percentage of the population to accept reality,
Clandestine can be first
Posted on 7/14/26 at 4:10 pm to HeadLightBanDit
Refresh my memory, who is in charge of administering elections? The POTUS?
Posted on 7/14/26 at 4:35 pm to BoarEd
"Who is responsible for national security and trying to thwart foreign interference in elections?" is the proper question.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 4:42 pm to BoarEd
Posted on 7/14/26 at 4:43 pm to JCdawg
Yes, A little misdirection!!!
Posted on 7/14/26 at 4:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
"Who is responsible for national security and trying to thwart foreign interference in elections?" is the proper question
1.You don't get to punish people for committing a crime if you stop them from committing the crime before it happens.
2. There are EOs that were signed, and still in effect, that will deal with this at the appropriate time. EOs specifically addressing foreign interference in our elections.
3. You've just watched a years' long sting operation unfold right before your eyes and your dumb arse is still blind to what's going on with it, which is hilarious.
4. When I say you're boring, you are really boring. Now, again, frick off to somplace else. Nobody gives a shite about your stupid opinions.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 4:52 pm to BoarEd
quote:
1.You don't get to punish people for committing a crime if you stop them from committing the crime before it happens.
2. There are EOs that were signed, and still in effect, that will deal with this at the appropriate time. EOs specifically addressing foreign interference in our elections.
3. You've just watched a years' long sting operation unfold right before your eyes and your dumb arse is still blind to what's going on with it, which is hilarious.
frick yeah
Posted on 7/14/26 at 4:53 pm to BoarEd
Posted on 7/14/26 at 4:54 pm to boosiebadazz
And you can join your fake lawyer friend wherever he is fricking off to. Nobody gives a damn about the opinions of fake lawyers.
Popular
Back to top


0







