- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dems lose election case as appeal court refuses to reconsider.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 12:59 am to LSUAngelHere1
Posted on 5/1/24 at 12:59 am to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
You really are terribly informed if you can’t think of the things this cabal ignores. I was hoping it was just an act.
Is there some reason why you didn't give examples?
2
Posted on 5/1/24 at 1:10 am to texridder
quote:
Is there some reason why you didn't give examples?
Bc the most obvious was student loan forgiveness but since you aren’t very well informed…. This admin ignored the judiciary & is still using the EPA to bypass the legislative branch.
Yet you tried to act like you needed examples to prove they ignore the judicial branch.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 4:45 am to Champagne
quote:
What if they ignore the court orders and count all of the mail in ballots anyway?
Marxist/dems don't follow laws.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 5:46 am to texridder
quote:
Do you have n example of that off the top of your head?
This whole thing is illegal under the constitution:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/03/07/executive-order-on-promoting-access-to-voting/
Posted on 5/1/24 at 6:02 am to texridder
quote:
What horseshite. IF the ballot arives on time what difference does it make if th evelope is hand dated or not. Nothing. A hyper-technical reading of the Civil Rights Act to keep votes from being counted.
You know what stops all this date and envelope stuff ? Brining your arse to the polls presenting an ID going into a booth and pressing a button . Mail in ballots were not designed to be the way to vote it’s an exception for those who can’t get to the polls . Your party is trying to make it the way to vote so they can cheat just as they did in 2020.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 6:09 am to texridder
quote:
What horseshite
Anything that pisses you off is a good thing.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 6:10 am to texridder
quote:
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, says a person’s right to vote cannot be denied for “an error or omission” that is “not material” in determining voting eligibility.”
You fricks cheated and broke election laws all for what? More wars.
Are you happy now?
Posted on 5/1/24 at 6:56 am to texridder
quote:
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, says a person’s right to vote cannot be denied for “an error or omission” that is “not material” in determining voting eligibility.”
Maybe this Act needs to be looked at a little closer by the SCOTUS, especially from a historical perspective. After all, we need closure.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:14 am to Red Stick Rambler
Why wouldn’t Trump campaign people not talk to the very people whom will vote him in. It’s up to we the people to be vote counters and watch dogs over communist Dems. It’s awful that it has come down to this.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:16 am to texridder
I agree everyone’s vote should be counted, but not three and four times. If you can’t put name and date on envelope then you can’t vote. So simple.
Posted on 5/4/24 at 10:02 am to Jspaspa3303
quote:
Mail in ballots were not designed to be the way to vote it’s an exception for those who can’t get to the polls . Your party is trying to make it the way to vote so they can cheat just as they did in 2020.
Seven states and D.C. hold elections by mail in voting. No problem.
There is not one confirmed and documented case of voter fraud in the 2020 election - just unsubstantisted twitter garbage.
Why don't you post a provable example of voter fraud in the 2020 election and document the proof?
Posted on 5/4/24 at 8:17 pm to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
Yet you tried to act like you needed examples to prove they ignore the judicial branch.
And you could only give the student loan example, which had already been posted.
So, you don't have an example of your own but you want to razz me about it.
Par or the course with you hayseeds on here.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News