Started By
Message

re: Curious how we feel about corporations getting the tariff refund upwards of $166b?

Posted on 8/5/26 at 12:27 pm to
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38533 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Where is the consumers refund? Is this the biggest fleece for Americans in history?

How could this have been prevented?
quote:

Short answer: The federal government collects tariffs from registered businesses bringing goods into the country, not from retail shoppers.
You asked the question and then answered it in your next reply. The federal government collected the tariffs from businesses bringing goods into the country, not from retail shoppers. Thus the federal government is refunding the tariffs to businesses bringing goods into the country, not to retail shoppers.

Posted by DUKE87
Covington, LA
Member since May 2021
1805 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 12:54 pm to
I answered how the tariffs worked.

The businesses then passed on this cost to the consumers.

They didn’t eat the cost. They didn’t lower prices. They didn’t absorb it. They did raise the cost of goods. It’s evident.
Posted by TejasHorn
High Plains Driftin'
Member since Mar 2007
11789 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 1:03 pm to
Yeah I’m not sure how simple econ is lost on people. Consumers pay tariffs in the end, corporations, importers and exporters aren’t just going to eat that tax out of the goodness of their heart.

To compound matters there is an externality where domestic producers can also charge more now that the bar is higher.
This post was edited on 8/5/26 at 1:10 pm
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38533 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 1:05 pm to
Read this slowly. Move your lips if you have to.

The government collected the tariff from the importer. That is why the government refunds the importer if the tariff is later overturned or ruled unlawful.

What happened after that is a private commercial transaction. The importer, wholesaler or retailer adjusted its prices, and consumers chose whether to buy at those prices. Once the cost was passed down the supply chain, the government was no longer a party to the transaction. It did not collect the higher retail price from the consumer, so it has no consumer payment to refund.

You can argue that businesses should pass the refund back through lower prices, or that Congress should create a consumer-compensation system. But “businesses raised prices” does not somehow turn consumers into the parties who paid the tariff to the federal government. Your own explanation established why the legal refund goes to the businesses that actually paid it.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38533 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 1:20 pm to
You are also making claims you have not established: that businesses suffered or absorbed no losses merely because they passed some or all of the tariff cost into higher prices.

The entire purpose of a tariff is to make imported goods more expensive and discourage purchases. A business can preserve its margin per unit while still losing money through reduced sales volume, lost market share, slower inventory turnover and disrupted contracts. Raising prices does not guarantee that total revenue or profit remained unchanged.

Being owed a tariff refund proves only that the business paid the tariff to the government. It does not prove the tariff caused the business no additional losses. You would need actual evidence about sales, margins and volume to establish that.
This post was edited on 8/5/26 at 1:21 pm
Posted by Captain Rumbeard
Member since Jan 2014
7402 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 2:47 pm to
I work for a foreign company that was paying the tarrifs. We then passed it down on future sales with price increases, but we were paying it apparently because corporate was hoping to recoup it soon with checks from the US government or something.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
11989 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 2:49 pm to
The issue is a federal judge having control of $166B, but you will not discuss that.
Posted by DUKE87
Covington, LA
Member since May 2021
1805 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:12 pm to
Did or did we not pay more for goods?
Posted by DUKE87
Covington, LA
Member since May 2021
1805 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:13 pm to
Can you say it louder so the crowd can hear you?
Posted by DUKE87
Covington, LA
Member since May 2021
1805 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:13 pm to
Discuss? This is so because of illegal tariffs to begin with.
Posted by Red Eagle
Member since Aug 2026
28 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

s this the biggest fleece for Americans in history?
Ukraine War takes the cake
Posted by Hoobadeedoobadee
Member since Jul 2026
18 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:24 pm to
Just one of many fleeces over the years.

To see people arguing for corporations getting millions back is mind blowing, but expected on the internet. I will give the working people living in the “guilded age” credit. At least they were smart enough eventually to know they were getting railed by their government officials and their corporate overlords.
Posted by tigrewoulds21
Member since May 2026
66 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:27 pm to

$166B is $500 per American citizen. For a family of 4 ask yourself would you really have supported paying $2k to have tariffs?
Posted by tigrewoulds21
Member since May 2026
66 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

I trust corporations to be more responsible with their money.



You realize they went on an anti-white, anti-conservative rampage for the past 10 years right?

quote:

I don’t trust the government with that money at all.


You literally trust them with the money when it comes to them printing it and giving it to corporations that hate you.
Posted by Captain Rumbeard
Member since Jan 2014
7402 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:50 pm to
Yeah this was a big deal at the beginning of the year when the CEO was broadcasting to an international internal audience that we'd lost about what the tarrif cost. But they were hopeful after that court case that the year was actually profitable.

That doesn't mean they didn't immediately enact a price increase to cover it if it didn't. They'd be stupid not to. So that's one iron hard rule of tarrifs we need to remember.

And I seriously doubt that price will ever come back down.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14717 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 11:16 pm to
quote:


You honestly think corporations adjusted their price or absorbed the cost? Or do you think they passed the cost onto the consumer?


There's no need to speculate or act as though one individual's anecdotal experience is representative of the whole. Whether any individual party chooses to absorb the tariffs are dependent on roughly the same factors that combine to determine whether a consumer buys a product: number of available substitute goods, elasticity, demand, etc.

So sure, I believe the poster above who says he absorbs them, but so what? Every market is different.

But again, no need to guess. Several studied have been done at this point. Over 90% of the tariffs have ultimately been absorbed by the US importer or the consumer. Of that 90%, about 70% have been consumers and about 30% the American importers.

As to the original question, "Curious how we feel about corporations getting the tariff refund upwards of $166b," that's easy.

The corporations were the entities who were legally required to pay the tariffs so they are the entities due a refund. If the government had collected illegal tariffs from consumers, then they would get the refund.

But the corporations "collected the tariffs" from consumers, and the transaction was completely voluntary on their part.

So consumers (not wholesalers or retailers who contracted with importers with a contract that itemized the tariff, actual consumers) are due nothing.

It's amazing to me that people really think they should or even could be.

Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14717 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

The government collected the tariff from the importer. That is why the government refunds the importer if the tariff is later overturned or ruled unlawful.

What happened after that is a private commercial transaction. The importer, wholesaler or retailer adjusted its prices, and consumers chose whether to buy at those prices. Once the cost was passed down the supply chain, the government was no longer a party to the transaction. It did not collect the higher retail price from the consumer, so it has no consumer payment to refund.

You can argue that businesses should pass the refund back through lower prices, or that Congress should create a consumer-compensation system. But “businesses raised prices” does not somehow turn consumers into the parties who paid the tariff to the federal government. Your own explanation established why the legal refund goes to the businesses that actually paid it.


This is the correct answer.

Again, it's amazing to me that anybody thinks otherwise.

A tariff is nothing but a tax.

Let's say that the IRS screwed up and overcharged a company one year for income taxes. The company raised prices the next year in response to the profits lost to the tax.

The company then made a successful appeal showing the error and the IRS refunded the overage.

This mentality is like claiming that the company owes all of its customers for that year the amount they were overtaxed because they passed the loss along to the consumer in the form of higher prices.

It's frankly asinine.
This post was edited on 8/5/26 at 11:22 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram