- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/19/25 at 9:28 am to GumboPot
quote:
Come up with a different name for a class of medications that only provides protection.
We could call it “the Phenylephrine of Vaccines.”
quote:
The Food and Drug Administration announced Wednesday that it would seek to pull a widely used ingredient in cough and cold medicines from the market, after the agency's scientists concluded that the oral version of the drug is ineffective as a nasal decongestant.
The FDA's proposal comes more than a year after the agency's outside advisers voted against continued use of the ingredient, called oral phenylephrine, citing concerns with the initial data used to support its approval and new data questioning its effectiveness.
This post was edited on 2/19/25 at 9:29 am
Posted on 2/19/25 at 9:31 am to Statestreet
quote:
There's now Science in town
FIFY
Posted on 2/19/25 at 9:41 am to Placekicker
Nah, ban it for children and let the libtard masked COVIDians inject themselves with that clot poison.
Posted on 2/19/25 at 9:46 am to L1C4
quote:
Didn't RFK say he wouldn't ban any vaccines?
Well. It's not a vaccine, it's gene therapy.
Posted on 2/19/25 at 9:46 am to L1C4
quote:
Didn't RFK say he wouldn't ban any vaccines?
Well. It's not a vaccine, it's gene therapy.
Posted on 2/19/25 at 5:42 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
To be nice, your posts show you have no knowledge or understanding of immunity and the history of vaccines. To be blunt, you are cementing yourself as a dumbass with your continued posts about this subject.
To provide direct prevention of respiratory virus infection, you need mucosal immunity from vaccines that target the mucosal tissues of the gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and genitourinary tracts, aiming to induce localized immune responses at these sites, primarily by generating secretory IgA antibodies, to prevent infections that enter the body through these mucosal surfaces. Currently, most vaccines are primarily stimulate blood-based antibodies that neutralize pathogens that already entered.
This post was edited on 2/19/25 at 5:45 pm
Posted on 2/20/25 at 6:47 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
Well. It's not a vaccine, it's gene therapy.
Calling a vaccine a gene therapy is like calling having a foie gras (liver of a goose or duck) as having a liver transplant. Gene therapy insert a piece of DNA into your gene, enable your cell to produce RNA (from the DNA). The RNA produce proteins. mRNA can not produce DNA (by your cell) or insert into your gene. It produce proteins for induce the immunity memory of B- or T-cells.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 6:50 am to Placekicker
Better late than never..... Those responsible for pushing the vaccine on the public and lying to the President and the public should be charged with wreckless endangerment.
This post was edited on 2/20/25 at 6:51 am
Posted on 2/20/25 at 6:51 am to Big4SALTbro
You want your leaders to be able to make adjustments after receiving new data and information.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 1:16 pm to CheLiu
quote:
To provide direct prevention of respiratory virus infection, you need mucosal immunity from vaccines that target the mucosal tissues of the gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and genitourinary tracts, aiming to induce localized immune responses at these sites, primarily by generating secretory IgA antibodies, to prevent infections that enter the body through these mucosal surfaces. Currently, most vaccines are primarily stimulate blood-based antibodies that neutralize pathogens that already entered.
Thank you for cementing that you are indeed a dumbass. You could not explain your copy and paste if your life depended on it.
And, the copy and paste you provided goes against the very posts you made earlier in the thread.
Unfortunately you won't be able to figure out why as immunology is way over your head.
Might want to venture back to High School biology and start over.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 1:49 pm to GumboPot
quote:
The medical community should not dilute the definition of vaccine.
This is one of things that makes me the most disappointed and upset about our response. There is a large pandemic sweeping across the globe that is a genuine threat to those over 65 and folks with particular lung conditions. People and governments around the world are looking to the U.S. for leadership, and what does the U.S. government do? Change the definition of 'vaccine'. Right in the middle of a fricking pandemic! The last thing you want to do is sow doubt and confusion, and that's exactly what they did at a time when the world needed stability and decisiveness the most. They needed an action like that the absolute least.
quote:
Come up with a different name for a class of medications that only provides protection.
There is. It's innoculation. But that isn't as sellable as vaccination - which everybody grew up knowing meant, and logically associated with, the prevention of infection. They needed to justify the pure evil of mandates.
I have one ask for Trump. PLEASE release the all of the records on the amount of money the U.S. government paid to pharmaceutical companies for that 'vaccine'. It's our taxpayer funds. It's not a matter of national security. It has no business being confidential under any pretext. We have the right to know.
This post was edited on 2/21/25 at 3:18 am
Popular
Back to top

0







