re: Conservatives: what's your beef with libertarianism?

quote:

---

I think the two of you would likely define hierarchical differently

---

That did occur to me

quote:

---

You fundamentally misinterpret the power of hierarchy and private property ethic. Rothbard clearly rejects any hierarchy whose creation and enforcement is done by the State. Conservatism, considered right on the paradigm, uses state enforced hierarchy to regulate social norms. This principle is fundamentally rejected by Libertarianism.

---

Virtually everyone subscribing to the Rothbardian libertarian school accepts hierarchy as the inevitable consequence of voluntary human interaction. The NAP rejects those hierarchical relationships resulting from the initiation of force, but recognizes that the private property ethic is necessarily prone to extensive and complex hierarchies.

quote:

---

Rothbard describes Libertarianisn as a “far left” ideology opposing Conservatism. Granted, he was using the global definition of those terms (not the bastardized American version) and went so far as to call Socialism a “lost and scattered ideology who methods are conservative nature seeking to find a liberal ends - of which is unattainable.”

---

This is somewhat unrelated to my point, but I think it's important to point out that Libertarianism was a leftist idea prior to Rothbards attempt to rescue it. His grounding of libertarianism in the private property ethic (PPE) in his canonical works essentially transformed the idea into a right wing one.

I fully accept the notion that libertarianism was left wing for its history predating the work of Rothbard. I also understand that Rothbard became decidedly more right wing towards the end of his life which obviously impacted how he spoke about these ideas.

quote:

---

Libertarians actually care about principles.

---

So do conservatives. Conservatives just happen to be pragmatic about it.

quote:

---

quote:

---

quote:

---

Libertarianism DOES NOT EXIST on the simplistic Left/Right spectrum.

---

Wrong. It is explicitly right wing.

---

Not on the popularly accepted left-right paradigm.

---

I find that you can usually get a fairly-accurate estimate of a person’s intellect if you can determine whether they evaluate political ideology on one axis, two or three.

quote:

---

I use like forty axes, I am on another level

---

You and Trump, right? 40-D ches and all. (joking)

At LEAST forty variables, but hard to think in more than about four axes. I am limited that way.

quote:

---

Libertarianism embraces hierarchical enforcement of social norms through the private property ethic described by Rothbard and refined to a micron edged point by Hans Hermann Hoppe of helicopter ride and "physical removal" fame.

---

Rothbard and Hoppe provide interesting thought exercises, but VERY few libertarians are as dogmatic as they.

quote:

---

Rothbard and Hoppe provide interesting thought exercises, but VERY few libertarians are as dogmatic as they

---

I'm only talking about actual libertarians that adhere to the canonical texts of modern libertarianisms founder and greatest student.

quote:

---

And by implication, then, and again without much further ado: Someone, anyone, is not a libertarian or merely a fake libertarian who affirms and advocates one or more of the following: the necessity of a State, any State, of ‘public’ (State) property and of taxes in order to live in peace; or the existence and justifiability of any so-called “human rights” or “civil rights” other than private property rights, such as “women rights,” “gay rights,” “minority rights,” the “right” not to be discriminated against, the “right” to free and unrestricted immigration, the “right” to a guaranteed minimum income or to free health care, or the “right” to be free of unpleasant speech and thought. The proponents of any of this may call themselves whatever they want, and as libertarians we may well cooperate with them, insofar as such a cooperation offers the promise of bringing us closer to our ultimate goal, but they are not libertarians or only fake libertarians.
Now, “a funny thing happened on the way to the forum.” While Rothbard and I, following in his footsteps, never went astray from these theoretically derived core beliefs, not just non-libertarians but in particular also fake libertarians, i.e., people claiming (falsely) to belibertarians, and even many possibly honest yet dim-witted libertarians have selected and vilified us as their favorite betes noires and incarnates of evil. Rothbard, the spiritus rector of modern libertarianism, has been branded by this so-called “anti-fascist” crowd as a reactionary, a racist, a sexist, an authoritarian, an elitist, a xenophobe, a fascist and, to top it all off, a self-hating Jewish Nazi. And I have inherited all of these honorary titles, plus a few more (except for the Jewish stuff). So what funny thing has happened here?

---

From the greatest speech on this topic ever delivered:

Mises inst. HHH libertarianism and the alt right

quote:

---

quote:

---

but it galls you so much to admit your only path to success is through the republicans, you take every opportunity to shite on them. I guess it makes you little libertarians feel bigger.

---

Um, no? We’ve been open about pushing the Republican Party more libertarian for over a decade

---

Far longer than that. I trace it back to at least Goldwater.

quote:

---

Libertarians are the worst

---

Little Mulder with his usual bitingly-insightful analysis.