- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Colorado vaccination site shuts down after 11 'adverse reactions' to Johnson & Johnson jab
Posted on 4/8/21 at 8:44 am to WPBTiger
Posted on 4/8/21 at 8:44 am to WPBTiger
quote:
“ Most of the 27 member countries of the EU have already resumed the use of AstraZeneca's vaccine.”
You might want to read the article.
Go for it. It's your body.
0
Posted on 4/8/21 at 8:46 am to TheMuffinMan
I had the J&J shot from the Commerce City location on Tuesday. No negative reaction at all.
Posted on 4/8/21 at 8:46 am to WPBTiger
quote:
one shot one kill approach.
That sounds about right.
Posted on 4/8/21 at 8:47 am to WPBTiger
They should move the MLB Allstar game
Posted on 4/8/21 at 8:51 am to WPBTiger
I'll never understand the rush of people and gov'ts to inject themselves with a hurried vaccine to a virus with a survival rate that high.
Posted on 4/8/21 at 9:04 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
I'll never understand the rush of people and gov'ts to inject themselves with a hurried vaccine to a virus with a survival rate that high.
Only reason I did was I am 55 with an underlying condition.
Posted on 4/8/21 at 9:04 am to WPBTiger
"This native advertisement 'story' was brought to you by Pfizer, who reminds you that all other vaccine brands will give you AIDS."
Posted on 4/8/21 at 9:20 am to RebelExpress38
quote:
Moderna and Pfizer have like 95% efficacy rates and Johnson & Johnson only has like 75%. Why anyone would get that shot over the others is dumb.
IIRC Johnson and Johnson are not mRNA derived. As such it is the only one that I would even consider taking (even though I plan on passing on taking the vaccine).
Posted on 4/8/21 at 9:21 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
IIRC Johnson and Johnson are not mRNA derived. As such it is the only one that I would even consider taking
Why?
Posted on 4/8/21 at 9:24 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
some people are drama queens, too, and over-exaggerate symptoms to gather sympathy.
The idea that you have to shut down a vaccination site because people are falling so ill that that they have to be treated with water and juice is completely retarded
Posted on 4/8/21 at 9:30 am to LNCHBOX
quote:What would be the political motivation? Even the Brits have decided to stop giving it to people under 30, and it's their vaccine.
ban to be political in nature and
quote:Do you think it's ethical to continue full distribution of the vaccine if they think there could be a link, just because they haven't proven it yet? Prudence is an odd thing to be snarky about.
unsurprisingly lacking of any science to follow.
Posted on 4/8/21 at 9:32 am to WildManGoose
quote:
Do you think it's ethical to continue full distribution of the vaccine if they think there could be a link, just because they haven't proven it yet? Prudence is an odd thing to be snarky about.
Look at the actual numbers and then tell me why they would even suspect a link
Spoiler alert, they shouldn't.
Posted on 4/8/21 at 9:50 am to RebelExpress38
quote:
Moderna and Pfizer have like 95% efficacy rates and Johnson & Johnson only has like 75%. Why anyone would get that shot over the others is dumb.
Not sure but maybe the fact that J&J's uses a trial tested version that's been around since 80's and mRNA vaccines don't have ANY TRIALS OR TESTS ON HUMANS....that trial is right now.
Posted on 4/8/21 at 9:53 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
The lightest bit of research shows that ban to be political in nature and unsurprisingly lacking of any science to follow.
So the blood clots were a lie then? Good to know.
Posted on 4/8/21 at 9:55 am to xGeauxLSUx
quote:
and mRNA vaccines don't have ANY TRIALS OR TESTS ON HUMANS
Why post something so easily disproven?
Posted on 4/8/21 at 9:55 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
IIRC Johnson and Johnson are not mRNA derived. As such it is the only one that I would even consider taking
quote:Because mRNA type vaccines have been tried for roughly 30 years. Prior to covid, they have NEVER been approved for public use because they have, among other things, an unacceptably high onset rate of auto-immune issues. This issue showed up in animal and long term testing. Covid vaccine was allowed to bypass animal and long term testing. These mRNA vaccines are not safe. Most will not have adverse effects, but there will be a fair amount of people after a few years who will have auto immune diseases which is way worse than covid.
Why?
That is why.
Posted on 4/8/21 at 9:57 am to upgrayedd
Posted on 4/8/21 at 10:01 am to PurpleandGeauld
quote:
. These mRNA vaccines are not safe. Most will not have adverse effects, but there will be a fair amount of people after a few years who will have auto immune diseases which is way worse than covid.
That is why.
Can I get some Powerball numbers while you're at it?
Posted on 4/8/21 at 10:04 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Why?
quote:
are not mRNA derived.
As stated though, I have no plans on taking any of these vaccines. Simply put, I’m not comfortable doing so. As for others that wish to, that is your choice and I respect that decision.
Posted on 4/8/21 at 10:04 am to jimmy the leg
That's not answering why, it's repeating the question.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News