re: Colorado cop uses flock cameras to falsely accuse citizen

quote:

---

Well yeah, the Constitution constrains law enforcement. But that doesn’t mean a law enforcement tool that can be abused is unconstitutional. It means government use of the tool remains subject to constitutional and statutory limits.

---

In this particular instance, supreme court has ruled that constant surveillance without warrant is unconstitutional.
The act of looking up somebody's movement and locational history by LE or gov agency without a warrant is therefore, unconstitutional because said person has been under constant surveillance without a warrant being issued for them to be surveilled.
A). They need no warrant to look up this information.
B) there was no warrant issued to record the information to make it available.
C). Flock, and similar companies do not have legal cause for the surveillance, as they cannot prove that they themselves are at potential harm, or seeking proof of harm against themselves.

Don't talk to cops. Agree and go along with whatever they are saying. Record it if possible. Your lawyer will get you released almost 100 percent of the time.