- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cohen to Testify That Trump Engaged in Criminal Conduct While in Office
Posted on 2/26/19 at 9:01 pm to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
Posted on 2/26/19 at 9:01 pm to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
quote:
Psst! Weisselberg testified.
And? We have it from Trumps mouth. I mean. How gullible are you? What happened 9/20/18? You are a punch line.
0
Posted on 2/26/19 at 9:02 pm to PhDoogan
I don't know about successful prosecutions, but they've got a successful plea and in AMI's non-prosecution agreement. AMI acknowledges meeting with Pecker and "another member of the campaign" (later id'd as Trump in reporting) and places the plan to catch and kill stories in the context of Trump's candidacy. So you've got AMI, Cohen, probably Weisselberg and the fact that the payments were made within a couple weeks of an election. Seems like a violation to me, though I'm naught but a dilettante. 
This post was edited on 2/26/19 at 9:15 pm
Posted on 2/26/19 at 9:04 pm to TigerDoc
More Stormy.
A winning issue I hope they press. Again.
A winning issue I hope they press. Again.
Posted on 2/26/19 at 9:05 pm to SSpaniel
The testimony of a CFO testifying with immunity vs a memo on the check marked “legal fees”.
Posted on 2/26/19 at 9:06 pm to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
quote:
The testimony of a CFO testifying with immunity vs a memo on the check marked “legal fees”.
Let's see what comes of it.
Posted on 2/26/19 at 9:06 pm to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
And an exculpatory audio recording. What’s your prediction?
This post was edited on 2/26/19 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 2/26/19 at 9:11 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
That's funny. Your mom would probably have gotten along well with my grandfather who was chairman of his state GOP during the Nixon presidency and never would speak to me about Watergate til the day he died 30+ years later.
Nixon had a lot going for him. Those were great days for the California Republicans who seemed to really be a great incubator of Republican talent. Weird to see the state caucus down to 7 reps.
I take you don't agree with the proposition that the American Republican party is doing now what California Republicans did in the Pete Wilson days with prop 187 and such, and demographically boxing themselves out of the future?
Nixon had a lot going for him. Those were great days for the California Republicans who seemed to really be a great incubator of Republican talent. Weird to see the state caucus down to 7 reps.
I take you don't agree with the proposition that the American Republican party is doing now what California Republicans did in the Pete Wilson days with prop 187 and such, and demographically boxing themselves out of the future?
This post was edited on 2/26/19 at 9:13 pm
Posted on 2/26/19 at 9:12 pm to TigerDoc
A plea agreement provides no precedent. SDNY could have had kiddie porn on those frickers but, because this is a politically motivated hackjob, got them to make a deal whereby they would cop to a non-crime.
Posted on 2/26/19 at 9:15 pm to PhDoogan
Hope we learn more tomorrow, though it looks like Gaetz & company are gonna shoot some squid-ink with Cohen girlfriends.
Posted on 2/26/19 at 9:17 pm to TigerDoc
Do we believe Cohen or not? How do we know when he is being truthful? If Cohen says trump directed him to violate the law...but we have trump on tape stating the opposite, which will you believe? And how do you come to that conclusion?
Posted on 2/26/19 at 9:23 pm to BBONDS25
Yeah, it'll take more than Cohen's word. Not sure what kind of documentary evidence there is. Of course, there are also more unnamed executives named in the statement of the offense (probably DJTJ). Too early to predict but not out of the realm of possibility they'll implicate Trump spawn.
Posted on 2/26/19 at 9:24 pm to TigerDoc
Not sure what more we could learn about CF violations- seems to me that the facts on that have been conceded and all the el'mints of the crime are conceded. I just want those spineless figs to pull the trigger on trying to impeach a sitting president for violations of a vague (predominately) regulatory law that has more loopholes than a Texas panty tornado.
Posted on 2/27/19 at 11:53 am to LSUnation78
quote:
the left putting all their chips on Cohen. Have fun with that.
Is it too early to bump these to say I told you so?
Oh well too bad if it is. I (along with many others) tried to tell you this wouldnt go the way it was being built up.
Posted on 2/27/19 at 9:39 pm to LSUnation78
bump part deux, because I must have missed the proof of criminal conduct, let alone while IN OFFICE
Posted on 2/27/19 at 9:42 pm to Decatur
Too bad Cohen's credibility is shot.
Posted on 2/27/19 at 9:49 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
there are also more unnamed executives named in the statement of the offense (probably DJTJ). Too early to predict but not out of the realm of possibility they'll implicate Trump spawn.
quote:
TigerDoc
Page 8 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News